• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

LTA got cheated $500 million by Austrian company, why no uproar in Parliament?

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Fucking MPs scream and wail over a few million $ from WP run ward, but a $500 million fuckup by LTA, and its all quiet on the western front? How can they award such a large contract to build MRT stations without investigating the company's financial background? This company has been in financial loss for a few years leading up to its bankruptcy. It did not happen overnight. Why did LTA not ask for a performance bond? Why did LTA not have adequate insurance coverage for these sort of damages? Why did LTA not seek guaranties from the spanish parent company that any losses incurred will be paid by them? Why did LTA not monitor the Austrian companies financial situation as its main office in Austria was facing impending bankruptcy and take steps to line up back up companies? Is Transport Minister Lewd Fuck You sleeping on the job? Wake the fuck up PAP.

LTA seeks $500m from failed contractor It files claims against Austrian builder for not completing two MRT projects


THE Land Transport Authority (LTA) has filed some $500 million in claims against bankrupt contractor Alpine Bau for not completing two MRT projects, in what is believed to be the biggest claim of its kind in Singapore. But it is unlikely to recoup anywhere near the full amount. The Austrian builder was working on the King Albert Park, Sixth Avenue and Tan Kah Kee stations of Downtown Line 2 when it filed for insolvency in June 2013. Despite having appointed two other builders - Australia's McConnell Dowell and Korea's SK E&C - to take over Alpine's contracts, and having them work round the clock, the LTA indicated that completion of the line will be delayed by at least three months.

It said: "Alpine Bau GmbH (Singapore branch) is in the process of being wound up and we have filed our proof of debt with the liquidator - Stone Forest Corporate Advisory Pte Ltd. "We have also filed a proof of debt with the administrator of Alpine Bau GmbH in its home jurisdiction of Austria." It would not say how much it was trying to recoup, but The Straits Times understands that claims filed with Stone Forest stand at just over $200 million. Another claim, filed with Austrian lawyer Ulla Reisch, a special administrator for the liquidation of the parent company, comes up to around $298 million. Mr Abuthahir Abdul Gafoor, executive director of Stone Forest, said it has received claims totalling about $300 million in Singapore. Mr Gafoor said his company has recovered about $6 million, mainly from the sale of assets such as vehicles, and from deposits previously paid by Alpine. He added: "The liquidators have also paid out preferential claims amounting to about $2.3 million to Alpine's employees." Mrs Reisch said she has received two claims amounting to €200.4 million (S$298 million) from the LTA. "Both claims are denied in full", but her office is in talks with the LTA's lawyers on the possibility of revising its claims downwards.

Mr Gafoor said that in terms of payouts, preferential creditors such as company employees, the Central Provident Fund and the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore will have priority. The LTA is not a preferential creditor. Observers said the LTA is likely to be saddled with a bigger bill for the two Alpine contracts. It awarded them to the Austrian group in 2009 for $670.7 million. Soon after the builder filed for insolvency, the LTA re-awarded the uncompleted projects to the two new contractors for $476 million. Although Alpine is not the first insolvency Stone Forest has had to deal with, it is the largest. Mr Gafoor said: "We have been involved in the restructuring or the winding up of a number of companies, but not involving debts of more than $50 million. "We are also seeing a trend of construction-related companies facing severe cashflow problems even though they may have good projects in hand." Meanwhile, construction work at the affected stretch is going flat out. Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew said the line will open in the first quarter of next year. The transport authority would not comment further on its claims against Alpine Bau. [email protected]
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
LTA is only familiar with, " char siew pau", "tua pau", " lin yong pau"...what they know about European's Alphine PAU?...this is a honest mistake, let's move on...but if this project is run by WP...they will demand that those in charge commit harakiri, they come clean & they will appoint 10 auditor's to check the books...

This one, kar go lang ...LTA!
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
AG pointed out lots of financial lapses that amounted to tens of millions dollars. The PAP didn't bother. Instead, they went after the WP for problems that were created by the PAP. Despite their incessant attacks, the PAP was unable to find any dirt to be able to charge the WP MPs.

Now, the PAP decides to use the court to usurp power from the elected MPs. Why have MPs when the PAP government can appoint its cronies to takeover at any time?
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
AG pointed out lots of financial lapses that amounted to tens of millions dollars. The PAP didn't bother. Instead, they went after the WP for problems that were created by the PAP. Despite their incessant attacks, the PAP was unable to find any dirt to be able to charge the WP MPs.

Now, the PAP decides to use the court to usurp power from the elected MPs. Why have MPs when the PAP government can appoint its cronies to takeover at any time?

Their god pass away, left behind a will, to demolish the house at 38 Oxley Road, but they can usurp the will of their god ( he may get up & slap them), they can do anything, as long as WE allow them...
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wow, we're outsourcing to Austrians now? I wonder how the procurement process went. :rolleyes:

Anyway, it's no biggie for the PAP govt. If they leech more than they splurge, it's still a net profit for them. 10% GST after the next GE would do very nicely. Of course, there will be plenty of justifications such as 'GST rebates for the needy', or 'we'll need to increase the tax revenue to provide for an ageing population'. You get the idea. :wink:
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Wow, we're outsourcing to Austrians now? I wonder how the procurement process went. :rolleyes:

Anyway, it's no biggie for the PAP govt. If they leech more than they splurge, it's still a net profit for them. 10% GST after the next GE would do very nicely. Of course, there will be plenty of justifications such as 'GST rebates for the needy', or 'we'll need to increase the tax revenue to provide for an ageing population'. You get the idea. :wink:

Maybe they spoke to Arnold??
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think the contract work like this.

If you have complete the job at stage one, we will pay you to this stage 1. I don't see LTA handling $500 million to the contractor without seeing them complete even the beginning of the job. How do you come to a conclusion that LTA has lost cool hot cash amounted of $500 Million ?

At least the government through MOM has drag some money back through worker's levy. Hahaha !
 
Last edited:

Leckmichamarsch

Alfrescian
Loyal
........ to forgive is divine
what fucking civil serpents do we have here..... pay so much money yet this sort of things happening!!
 

zookeeper

Alfrescian
Loyal
I don't see LTA handling $500 million to the contractor without seeing them complete even the beginning of the job.

Nobody knows the actual progressive payments schedule until they read the contract.
A kind owner could finance most of the project by making a disproportionately large early payment.
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
I think the contract work like this.

If you have complete the job at stage one, we will pay you to this stage 1. I don't see LTA handling $500 million to the contractor without seeing them complete even the beginning of the job. How do you come to a conclusion that LTA has lost cool hot cash amounted of $500 Million ?

At least the government through MOM has drag some money back through worker's levy. Hahaha !

I will explain to you like this.

On a contract this size, a down payment, initial payment is usually made. Than progressive draws are given on a predetermined interval, usually based on the amount of work that has already been done. eg. 20% completed on the project gets a draw of XXX$ for Alpine Bau. Its is possible that LTA made the initial payment, but Alpine did not do enough work as per the contract.

The clue is that Alpine Bau made the project so far behind because of its bankruptcy that LTA was forced to hire not one back up but 2 back contractors to finish the job. And they paid a premuim for these contractors to work overtime to get it done close to the deadline. When you are forced to hire contractors at such short notice and you ask them to expedite the work for you, they will quote you a high bid because you need them to pretty much try to meet the deadline no expenses spared. This is where the loss comes in, it is costing LTA hundreds of millions of $ in extra cost to hire these 2 companies to finish up at breakneck speed. LTA is trying to recover this cost from Alpine Bau. But this does not answer the following questions:

- Where was the completion bond on this project? LTA should have insisted on Alpine Bau giving them a performance bond, usually in an irrevocable LOC from a bank, so if Alpine cannot finish the project, LTA calls the bond and gets some money that way. Minimum should be a $100 million perfomance bond.
-WHy did LTA nor Alpine Brau take out insurance on the project to protect themselves from this eventuality?
- Why was there no clause in the contract that would allow LTA to terminate it in the even of insolvency of Alpine or if Alpine was sold or merged with another company. Instead of immediately terminating the contract, they dragged it on until the project is so far behind schedule. They need to cut their losses early and run.

After over 20 years of building MRT, they still don't have a singapore company that can do this? They are always giving the MRT projects to Japanese, Koreans, European companies etc. What happens in those countries to the parent companies, no one knows. If a local company was awarded such a MRT project and in the middle of it encountered financial difficulties, the word would have been out and LTA would know about it long before anything happens instead of being blind sided like this. Bottom line is LTA did not do proper due dilligence on Alpine and then never monitored Alpine's financial health after awarding them the contract. Lewd Fuck You is strangely silent on this.
 
Last edited:

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Well, this is the issue here with the huge PAP bureaucracy. In other countries, the tracks, rail lines and stations are owned, and build and operated by the train company. An example of this would be Amtrak in the US. But here for some stupid reason, there is an additional level of unnecessary bureaucracy, the stations, lines and rail infrastructure is owned by LTA, while the trains and service is owned by SMRT. By rights, SMRT as a "private" ltd company should build their own fucking stations and rail infrastructure. this way, if an Alpine Bau happened to them, the shareholders are the ones that suffer the losses and the red ink. If SMRT had to write off $500 million, some heads on the BOD will roll. Now, because LTA is behind all this, the loss goes to the taxpayer. Fucking PAP.
 
Top