• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

It is Mr and Mrs Yee who never bail their child out

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
and you people blame blame blame others.

Why?

What is your problem? The parents care more about themselves than their child. They shouldn't have given birth to him. Fortunately, Amos is like Jesus ...except that he is going to be the saviour of sinkapore.

Amos could have avoid being remand if District Judge Ronald Gwee (who is this idiot doing the PAP's dirty work of persecuting a boy?) did not change the bail term. Then he imposed all sort of ridiculous conditions.

If you want to persecute critics, have the guts to admit it instead of issuing all sorts of ridiculous excuses!!!!!
 

PStanley

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset


Amos Yee, who has three lawyers now, has been bailed out by a counsellor


Published on Apr 21, 2015 7:00 PM

jdamosyee21e.jpg


Amos Yee waving at photographer after he was bailed out on April 21, 2015. -- ST PHOTO: AZIZ HUSSIN

jdahamos21e.jpg


Amos Yee and his mother leaving the State Courts after he was bailed out by family and youth counsellor Mr Vincent Law. -- ST PHOTO: AZIZ HUSSIN

jdvincent21e.jpg


Amos Yee's bailor is family and youth counsellor Mr Vincent Law, 51. -- ST PHOTO: AZIZ HUSSIN  

By Amir Hussain

SINGAPORE - Amos Yee, the 16-year-old whose online rants against Christianity have landed him in trouble with the law, is out on bail after spending four nights in remand.

Yee was brought from the court lockup to the bail centre at 6pm in handcuffs and leg shackles, escorted by five auxiliary police officers and three police officers.

His bailor is Mr Vincent Law, 51, a family and youth counsellor.

Said Mr Law: "I'm a Christian and it seems that the charge said that he made disparaging remarks against Christianity. I'm a Christian and I'm stepping up to say that I'm not offended."

"I'm also a parent and I feel for his parents."

He added that he hopes Yee is willing to be counselled by him, and reckons the youth may "respond better to a third party", especially since he is a counsellor.

Yee also has three lawyers representing him pro bono now.

Lawyer Alfred Dodwell told District Judge Ronald Gwee that he would be representing Yee along with lawyers Chong Jia Hao and Ervin Tan.

Mr Dodwell also told the court that someone was on the way to post bail for the teenager, who had been in remand since last Friday after his parents did not post bail.

The lawyer got in touch with Yee's parents two days ago.

Speaking to reporters later, Mr Dodwell said the lawyers are representing Yee because of his age and because "we believe everybody needs legal representation".

He said they did not condone or approve of what Yee did, but wanted to provide him with "proper legal representation so that he can be advised of the three charges" that he is facing.

The lawyers also handed out a statement to reporters, explaining why they were acting for him. It said that "the fundamental tenets of access to justice is enhanced if any person - including a 16 year-old accused of criminal offences - is represented by lawyers, instead of being left to navigate the criminal justice system without legal representation".

The statement also said the lawyers would advise Yee on his bail conditions; on whether pleading guilty or innocent would be the most appropriate course of action; and on sentencing options available to the court including those that deal with young offenders.

District Judge Ronald Gwee set the teen's next pre-trial conference for April 30.


Yee was charged on March 31 with attacking Christianity, transmitting an obscene image and making an online video containing remarks about founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew that offended viewers. He agreed as a condition of his bail not to post anything online until his case is decided.

But last Tuesday, he asked for donations to fund legal fees, on his blog and Facebook page. The blog post included links to the offensive videos and posts that led to him being charged in the first place. Yee was remanded last Friday after the judge at a pre-trial conference converted the $20,000 police bail that he had been on to court bail, requiring bail to be reposted. But his parents decided against posting bail.

On Saturday, a spokesman for the Attorney-General's Chambers made it clear after queries from The Straits Times that the only reason the teenager remained in remand was that no one had come forward to provide the bail. The spokesman added that potential bailors did not have to deposit the $20,000 with the court, but simply pledge that they are good for the money. They also need to show they can ensure that Amos sticks to the bail conditions and shows up in court when required.


 

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
What is your problem? The parents care more about themselves than their child. They shouldn't have given birth to him. Fortunately, Amos is like Jesus ...except that he is going to be the saviour of sinkapore. Amos could have avoid being remand if District Judge Ronald Gwee (who is this idiot doing the PAP's dirty work of persecuting a boy?) did not change the bail term. Then he imposed all sort of ridiculous conditions. If you want to persecute critics, have the guts to admit it instead of issuing all sorts of ridiculous excuses!!!!!

Hahaha! U said Amos is like Jesus? Bless your simpleton mind. Lol
 

Tuayapeh

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Why his mother bother to pick him up when she doesn't even want to bail him out ?
 

winners

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is very wrong and naive for that Vincent Law to say that he is not offended as a Christian, even if he really means it. That's because by saying as such, it'll now give even more firing power to that defiant kid, as it'll lead him to believe that he had done no wrong all these while. If Vincent Law is trying to practise reverse psychology on that kid, I'm sure it's not going to work.

I'd love to see how this whole episode will eventually pan out to the final outcome.
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
It is very wrong and naive for that Vincent Law to say that he is not offended as a Christian, even if he really means it. That's because by saying as such, it'll now give even more firing power to that defiant kid, as it'll lead him to believe that he had done no wrong all these while. If Vincent Law is trying to practise reverse psychology on that kid, I'm sure it's not going to work.

I'd love to see how this whole episode will eventually pan out to the final outcome.

What so wrong about that? He has the right to say anything he wants...

You have a fucking problem with the freedom of what people are saying?

Then don't fucking read it!!!!

Fuck your mother's phua chee buy..
 

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The parents didn't bail him out and they didn't complain anything about it.

Others complain a lot but didn't want to do anything.
 

winners

Alfrescian
Loyal
There's already 1 autistic bastard here who claims to have donated to him okay. But I wonder how he can do that when he can't even spell "diary" from "dairy". Probably he'll get his account number screwed up as well. Oh, pardon me, I forgot that he's autistic.

This autistic bastard should have grown some balls last weekend and bail him out instead of being just a ball less keyboard warrior here. Shame on this useless bastard. His parents are just as disappointed as Amos' parents.
 
Last edited:

coogans

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
There's already 1 autistic bastard here who claims to have donated to him okay. But I wonder how he can do that when he can't even spell "diary" from "dairy". Probably he'll get his account number screwed up as well. Oh, pardon me, I forgot that he's autistic.

This autistic bastard should have grown some balls last weekend and bail him out instead of being just a ball less keyboard warrior here. Shame on this useless bastard. His parents are just as disappointed as Amos' parents.

There is only 1 retarded person who posts regularly so I know who you are talking about.
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
It is very wrong and naive for that Vincent Law to say that he is not offended as a Christian, even if he really means it. That's because by saying as such, it'll now give even more firing power to that defiant kid, as it'll lead him to believe that he had done no wrong all these while. If Vincent Law is trying to practise reverse psychology on that kid, I'm sure it's not going to work.

I'd love to see how this whole episode will eventually pan out to the final outcome.

Me too as a Christian was not offended. We Christians have seen much worse cases of Christian bashing. What Amos has said is really nothing. He could carrying on and we Christians are not bothered.

More fire power? Exactly! When this case comes up for hearing, the court has to accept the reality that most Christians are not concerned with his outburst. We are more concerned with his well being, his rights, his welfare.

He should not be punished any more than the anti-Christians who mouthed anti-Christian hate messages. And those anti-Christians are more hateful in their speeches and actions! Has any been prosecuted? NONE!

So young Amos should use his bailor Vincent Law as a good example. Thanks winners for pointing this out. You are always a 'winner'!
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
amos yee already spent a night in prison remand,how can he be jesus christ?he already had his precious 17 year old bumhole deflowered by

 

greenies

Alfrescian
Loyal
You are spot on.
Whoever thinks offended by anti-religious matter is similar to extremist.

In Chrit, he was offended in his time many times, but he ignored them and made the world peaceful.
He never countered to the offenders.

In Buddhist, the Buddha was cursed, accused and offended by many people in his time.
He conquered all of them through his passion and wisdom.
He did not use any of his power or his followers to beat them.

If we follow and practise what we are taught accordingly in our own religion, nobody would feel offended.
Since our religious founders' time, there were differences in own belief and our religious belief was ridiculed by others. But even our founder(s) forgave them and ignored them.
Why shouldn't we do the same as our teachers?



Me too as a Christian was not offended. We Christians have seen much worse cases of Christian bashing. What Amos has said is really nothing. He could carrying on and we Christians are not bothered.

More fire power? Exactly! When this case comes up for hearing, the court has to accept the reality that most Christians are not concerned with his outburst. We are more concerned with his well being, his rights, his welfare.

He should not be punished any more than the anti-Christians who mouthed anti-Christian hate messages. And those anti-Christians are more hateful in their speeches and actions! Has any been prosecuted? NONE!

So young Amos should use his bailor Vincent Law as a good example. Thanks winners for pointing this out. You are always a 'winner'!
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
You are spot on.
Whoever thinks offended by anti-religious matter is similar to extremist.

In Chrit, he was offended in his time many times, but he ignored them and made the world peaceful.
He never countered to the offenders.

In Buddhist, the Buddha was cursed, accused and offended by many people in his time.
He conquered all of them through his passion and wisdom.
He did not use any of his power or his followers to beat them.

If we follow and practise what we are taught accordingly in our own religion, nobody would feel offended.
Since our religious founders' time, there were differences in own belief and our religious belief was ridiculed by others. But even our founder(s) forgave them and ignored them.
Why shouldn't we do the same as our teachers?


It has nothing to do with Christianity or Jesus.

The LKY fantards are unhappy with Amos slighting their recently dead Hakka superstar god.

That little tongue-in-cheek reference to Jesus Christ provided very convenient ammo ('religious harmony') to fix Amos. Because it would seem a tad desperate, even by PAP's standards, to accuse a boy of defaming a dead person. 'Religious harmony'... ah, that concerns the stability of Singapore society. Surely there is a public consensus to do what is in Singapore's best interests? :wink:

That is why the LKY fantards and the PAP's shills want Amos to be harshly punished. What they hadn't expected was the growing support, or at least sympathy for Amos.

During the reign of Lee Hsien Loong over the past decade, there have been certain incidents which were akin to the PAP scoring an own goal. Population White Paper, Little India riot etc. We can say for certain that the Amos Yee incident of 2015 is the final nail in Lee Hsien Loong's political coffin. We knew this day would come after his infamous father's death, but it is surprising that it came so fast.
 
Top