-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Walter Scott shot in the back
- Thread starter Leongsam
- Start date
This is the only Walter Scott I know.
I don't see what's ridiculous about it. Shooting someone in the back was what we were all taught to do in the SAF. This sign appeared at 50 metre intervals throughout the SAFTI perimeter fence.
Attachments
This had been in the pxp DNA & S.O.P., they had been 'shooting in the back' of the 60% voters since 1959..& that is why SAF incorporated it in the perimeter signs...what's new...."meoooowww"!!
Its genocide.
I beg to differ. Anyone who runs from the police obviously has some serious crime to hide. He deserves his fate.
If your keen skills of observation hasn't eluded you, the gas discharge in front of the barrel shows a single shot! 7 extra shots? What has he been smoking? A criminal waste of resources if you asked me!
......and the police car came within 1 min..........
and this nigger poodle has his gloves all ready...........
and both of them did not see they're been recorded............
Divide and conquer........
the FEMA camps need to be filled and fast. This is how you do it to break the country further apart, then the storm troopers
can come in to restore order.
and this nigger poodle has his gloves all ready...........
and both of them did not see they're been recorded............
Divide and conquer........
the FEMA camps need to be filled and fast. This is how you do it to break the country further apart, then the storm troopers
can come in to restore order.
Americans are fucking stupid. Instead of asking why the fuck that black man was running away from the cop, they wanted to blame the cop for doing his work.
Only crooks run away from cops and only crooks blame policeman for doing their job. Americans are full of crooks.
Only crooks run away from cops and only crooks blame policeman for doing their job. Americans are full of crooks.
Disagree. Walter may have something to hide, but he didn't deserve to be murdered.
The cop didn't murder anyone he was simply doing his job of removing crooks from the streets of America.
That's what cops are for. They deal with the baddies on our behalf. We should be grateful.
Removing crooks from the streets isn't the same as killing them. Removing crooks doesn't justify killing them. You fired 8 shots and you didn't mean to kill?
Killing on the job is only justified in self-defence, or if the suspect running away is armed and known to be dangerous to the public. Neither of which applies in this case.
So you guys happy that sinkie poodles aren't trigger happy? Maximum restraint has its benefits
Killing them is the best way of removing them. If you don't kill them they'll be out on bail in no time at all to continue their crime sprees.
If the state does succeed in locking them up they then become an overhead costing the taxpayer big bucks to feed, clothe and house.
The black guy had a choice to comply with a lawful order from a cop and he would have been handcuffed and processed. He chose to run instead. He paid the price of making a poor decision but it's hardly the cop's fault unless the cop told him to run so he could have some target practice.
If the sinkie cops and opened fire, they'd have gained far more respect. Hiding in an ambulance has made them a laughing stock forever.
So you don't believe in rehabilitation? That criminals ought to be given a 2nd chance? That they can change?
Crooks can never be rehabilitated. Some mellow as they grow older and are no longer the threat they were before but why take the chance? Just shoot them and be done with it. It's a far better long term solution.
I thought the police is suppose to say " STOP, in the name of love!..oops!, in the name of the law"?...before he fires, or fire a shot in the air, before, shooting the person? & was supposed to shoot between the legs, oops!..the legs!??
Similar threads
