• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

CASE say petrol companies price gouging motorists

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE: The consumer watchdog here has accused some petrol companies of profiteering, after petrol prices across the island were raised on Tuesday (Feb 25) by up to S$0.25 for a litre of 98-octane grade petrol and as much as S$0.18 for 95-octane grade petrol - a day after it was announced in the Budget statement that petrol duty rates would be increased with immediate effect.

Noting that some of the petrol prices were raised beyond the levels of the duty hike, Mr Seah Seng Choon, executive director of the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE), said it was understandable for the petrol companies to increase prices following the levy hike. But he pointed out: “They should not increase more than what the tax requires them to and if they do that, they are profiteering from the situation.”

As of Tuesday night, a litre of 98-octane-grade petrol at Shell cost S$2.28 - S$0.25 more than on Monday. Other brands also adjusted their prices, with Caltex, Esso and Singapore Petroleum Company (SPC) charging S$2.25, S$2.23 and S$2.20, respectively. The increment ranged between S$0.17 and S$0.21 for the three brands.

For 95-octane-grade petrol, which is most popular with drivers, Shell raised the price by S$0.18 to S$2.04 per litre. The other three brands raised their prices to S$2.01 or S$2.02 — with the increases ranging between S$0.12 and S$0.16.

At noon on Wednesday, Shell decreased the prices of various grades of petrol by S$0.02. The prices for 98-octane-grade petrol, 95-octane-grade petrol and V-Power were S$2.26, S$2.02 and S$2.63 respectively.

“(The) pump price adjustments reflect the increase in petrol duties as announced in the 2015 Budget,” said a spokesperson from Chevron, which owns the Caltex brand. The other brands could not be reached for comment by press time.

Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced on Monday that petrol duty rates would increase by S$0.20 to S$0.64 per litre for the premium grade and by S$0.15 to S$0.56 per litre for the intermediate grade. To cushion the impact of the hike, motorists would be given a one-off road tax rebate for a year. Mr Tharman noted that with falling oil prices, pump prices after the duty hikes would remain lower than the levels in the past two-and-a-half years.

Salesman Andrew Koh, 58, welcomed the road tax rebate, but felt it was not enough to mitigate the higher petrol prices. “I was happy when crude oil prices started falling... But now, all the drivers are going to suffer from the increase in levy and petrol prices,” he said.

On Tuesday, Mr Tharman said the taxes related to vehicle ownership and usage would have to be adjusted from time to time, to create a greener environment. Adding that the previous adjustment to petrol levies was done a dozen years ago, he said it was better to raise duties when oil prices are falling, compared with the opposite situation. It was also unlikely the duty hikes would filter down to overall consumer prices as commercial vehicles use diesel, he said. As for middle-income families who own cars, Mr Tharman said other measures in the Budget could alleviate the cost of living.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
But he pointed out: “They should not increase more than what the tax requires them to and if they do that, they are profiteering from the situation.”

So what are you going to do about it, oh mighty CASE? You couldn't even deal with Jover Chew and Volks Auto, let's see you take on the oil oligarchy. :rolleyes:
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
So what are you going to do about it, oh mighty CASE? You couldn't even deal with Jover Chew and Volks Auto, let's see you take on the oil oligarchy. :rolleyes:


It is their job to bark and make noise, so that the 60% believe that Government is with them and for them. But nothing further away from the truth, big business and Government are in bed together. Sometimes, making some noise and name calling is the name of the game.

Just like Husband and Wife. Just seems the wife is going to break the cycle, but still goes back to hubby.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
who does CASE belong to !!! take cock only

You need an answer for this? The head of CASE is related to......?? CASE is just a "blowjob"...organisation...blow, where the wind blows...& BLOW where they should blow....
 

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
SINGAPORE: The consumer watchdog here has accused some petrol companies of profiteering, after petrol prices across the island were raised on Tuesday (Feb 25) by up to S$0.25 for a litre of 98-octane grade petrol and as much as S$0.18 for 95-octane grade petrol - a day after it was announced in the Budget statement that petrol duty rates would be increased with immediate effect.



JBJ was right decades ago when he said that under the Singapore government, big companies will move towards price collusion rather than market competition.

This is of course aided and abetted by hapless, incompetent watchdogs who have their hands tied by the very same govt who has vested interests in seeing their own GLCs make as much profit as possible.

That is why the Singapore system has completely broken down.
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
JBJ was right decades ago when he said that under the Singapore government, big companies will move towards price collusion rather than market competition.

This is of course aided and abetted by hapless, incompetent watchdogs who have their hands tied by the very same govt who has vested interests in seeing their own GLCs make as much profit as possible.

That is why the Singapore system has completely broken down.

It is a necessary evil then. What if the oil majors threaten to move out of singapore? That would be terrible now, wouldn't it?
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
In other words, the Petrol company does not care a fuck about it.



SINGAPORE: The Competition Commission of Singapore (CCS) has asked petrol companies to explain their fuel price adjustments, which came a day after a hike in petrol duty prices was announced in Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam's Budget speech on Monday.

In a response to media queries, the Ministry of Trade and Industry and CCS on Wednesday (Feb 25) said in a joint statement that they “will not hesitate to take firm action against parties who are found to be engaging in anti-competitive behaviour at the expense of consumers”.

Petrol prices across the island were raised on Tuesday by up to S$0.25 for a litre of 98-octane grade petrol and as much as S$0.18 for 95-octane grade petrol. That is 5 cents and 3 cents higher than the increases in the respective petrol duty rates.

Consumer watchdog CASE has accused the petrol firms of "profiteering" and sent letters to them, asking them to justify the price increases.

CASE Executive Director Seah Seng Choon said: "While petrol prices have fallen by 2 cents as compared to yesterday, pump prices are still higher than the recommended 15 to 20 cents increase for intermediate and premium grade petrol respectively. We would still require the petrol companies to give a satisfactory explanation as to why their prices have increased beyond the tax increment."

Shell, which had dropped its petrol prices by two cents on Wednesday, said in a statement that aside from government excise duties, other factors also impact pump prices. These include crude oil prices, exchange rates, manufacturing and production costs from crude oil to fuel, the distribution costs of bringing the fuel to retail sites, operating costs of running service stations, and goods and services taxes.

A Shell spokesperson added that the company considers these factors carefully before deciding on any price changes.

Meanwhile Chevron, which owns the Caltex brand, said its pump price adjustments reflect the increase in petrol duties as announced in the 2015 Budget.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
LOL. Competition Commission? Get your own house sorted first (NTUC Fairprice) before pretending to be some vigilant watchdog group. :rolleyes:
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
LOL. Competition Commission? Get your own house sorted first (NTUC Fairprice) before pretending to be some vigilant watchdog group. :rolleyes:

Thanks to NTUC Fairprice, hypermarts and supermarket chains to not dare to collude and raise prices on their own! Very silly of you not to know.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Thanks to NTUC Fairprice, hypermarts and supermarket chains to not dare to collude and raise prices on their own! Very silly of you not to know.

NTUC Fairprice engages in anti competitive acts by having their 'House Brand' products that are cheaper than the competition.

Only in Singapore is such behaviour not being investigated. :rolleyes:


Housebrand1-inside.png
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
NTUC Fairprice engages in anti competitive acts by having their 'House Brand' products that are cheaper than the competition.

Only in Singapore is such behaviour not being investigated. :rolleyes:


Housebrand1-inside.png

A very warped sense of reality you have, laksaboy! It is common practice even in advanced western democracies like the US, where large retailers like Walmart offers house brands to their more price sensitive customers. It is a good thing for consumers you see, because prices are usually lower than the average competing brands. How is that a bad thing? How is it anti-competitive when it encourages price competition? Can you prove they are dumping products or selling them at a loss? Why would they do that? I think you don't know what you are talking about. Typical anti-establishment troll. :rolleyes:

That is why NTUC is the best. Tripartitite wansui! PAP wansui! Merdeka PAP!
 

Singapore

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
A very warped sense of reality you have, laksaboy! It is common practice even in advanced western democracies like the US, where large retailers like Walmart offers house brands to their more price sensitive customers. It is a good thing for consumers you see, because prices are usually lower than the average competing brands. How is that a bad thing? How is it anti-competitive when it encourages price competition? Can you prove they are dumping products or selling them at a loss? Why would they do that? I think you don't know what you are talking about. Typical anti-establishment troll. :rolleyes:

That is why NTUC is the best. Tripartitite wansui! PAP wansui! Merdeka PAP!

Save for the your final statement on NTUC is the Best, I agree with what you said above.

And if you dig further, some of these house brands uses the same 3P manufacturers as those branded ones. The reason they can sell cheaper is because house brands has no or little A&P costs unlike branded ones.
 

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
What do you think of NTUC Fairprice setting up a petrol company? Someone thinks they are doing a good job in keeping groceries affordable and could consider joining the petroleum industry to help keep petrol prices in check...

http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/forum-letters/story/more-competition-needed-level-price-20150227

U know what! That's a great idea. Although I thought SPC may moderate the prices somewhat but they r just as geedy and profit motivated as the Shells and Essos.
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
What do you think of NTUC Fairprice setting up a petrol company? Someone thinks they are doing a good job in keeping groceries affordable and could consider joining the petroleum industry to help keep petrol prices in check...

http://www.straitstimes.com/premium/forum-letters/story/more-competition-needed-level-price-20150227


NTUC forray into ESSO is to manage their day to day operation of petrol station. You will notice that Shell is being manage by 7-11. Running a petrol station is not profitable according to sources.

So what NTUC and 7/11 has done is that they will run the day to day operation, providing support to run the operation. They too can hawk their product in the station. It is a win win situation for both petrol company and NTUC and Retailers. SPC is being sold to China Petroleum long time ago.
 

dodgeball

Alfrescian
Loyal
NTUC forray into ESSO is to manage their day to day operation of petrol station. You will notice that Shell is being manage by 7-11. Running a petrol station is not profitable according to sources.

So what NTUC and 7/11 has done is that they will run the day to day operation, providing support to run the operation. They too can hawk their product in the station. It is a win win situation for both petrol company and NTUC and Retailers. SPC is being sold to China Petroleum long time ago.

NTUC Fairprice has outlets in ESSO but it is not managing the day-to-day operations of ESSO.
 
Top