• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Rising Sinkie Xenophobia Against More Talented Pinoys

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
By Tessa Wong BBC News, Singapore http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-28953147

The Philippines' ambassador to Singapore Antonio A Morales says that Filipinos are moving into more sectors of employment

One of Singapore's most popular comic characters happens to be a Filipino maid called Leticia Bongnino.

A fictional character from a television sketch show, she embodies a stereotype familiar to Singaporeans who have long relied on Filipinos to tend to their homes.

But it is also a stereotype that has become outdated, as more Filipinos move into new professions here.

These days a Singaporean professional is likely to have Filipino colleagues. With many more taking up service sector jobs, he is also likely to be served by a Filipino at a restaurant, supermarket, or doctor's clinic.

The estimated number of Filipinos working in Singapore tripled in the past decade to about 167,000 as of 2013, according to Philippines census data. The Singapore government declined to provide the BBC with official figures.

But their rising visibility in Singapore's society has drawn attention. Amid increasing general resentment towards foreigners, a backlash towards Filipinos has taken place.

Earlier this year, a plan to hold a Philippines Independence Day celebration on Singapore's main shopping street Orchard Road was cancelled following online complaints by some Singaporeans who said the space was special to locals.

One blogger called the move "insensitive", saying: "Celebrating your Independence Day openly in the public (especially [at a] iconic/tourist location like Orchard Road) is provocative."

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said he was "appalled" by those who had harassed organisers, calling them a "disgrace to Singapore". Many Singaporeans also lambasted those who complained about the event.

But anti-Filipino sentiment has continued to swirl online, culminating in a blog titled Blood Stained Singapore suggesting ways to abuse Filipinos, calling them "an infestation".

The suggestions, which included pushing Filipinos out of trains and threats to spray insecticide on them, alarmed the public. The blog was eventually taken down by Google for infringing content rules.
Picture of Lucky Plaza, a Filipino hub in Singapore The shopping mall Lucky Plaza on Orchard Road is a popular Filipino hub in Singapore
Picture of Ngee Ann City shopping mall at Orchard Road in Singapore The Philippines independence day event was scheduled to be held at a prominent plaza on Orchard Road

Change in profile

The Philippines ambassador to Singapore, Antonio A Morales, told the BBC in a recent interview that "by and large" Filipinos were accepted in Singapore, and his embassy had not received any complaints of physical abuse.

But he expressed concern about "the few Singaporeans" who have lashed out, and condemned the blog that suggested abusing Filipinos.

"I think it was unfair and racist and discriminatory," he said, adding that the blogger had still not been identified. Singapore police have launched an investigation and say the case is still being probed.

Part of the problem is that Filipinos are willing to take on jobs for lower salaries, with working conditions unacceptable to Singaporeans.

The trend has made Filipinos "easier to exploit", disadvantaging both them and Singaporeans, said migrant rights activist Jolovan Wham.

Sociologist Tan Ern Ser said that when Filipinos were mostly domestic workers, "they posed less of a threat, since they were in jobs which were less attractive to locals."

But now, "they may be perceived as competitors for jobs in sales, services, or professions that Singaporeans would take up but preferably at higher wage levels, consistent with their aspirations".

The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment here is a recent phenomenon, with increasing immigration triggering underlying anxieties, say observers.

"Over the decades, the ruling government has emphasised that we are a small island with a lack of natural resources," noted sociologist Terence Chong.

But this "survivalist rhetoric", meant to spur on citizens, has now had the inadvertent effect of creating resentment against foreigners who are seen as competition for limited resources.

'Keep our heads down'

Filipinos here said that Singaporeans have been accepting, although they are concerned about escalating anti-foreigner sentiment.

Media executive Jina L said Filipino professionals like her "keep our heads down" in Singapore. "We can be vocal, but we know when we should keep a low profile," says the 49-year-old permanent resident.

Restaurant supervisor Michelle Villegas, 31, felt "sad and worried" about online attacks. At work she has encountered customers who have made fun of her for being Filipino.

She came to Singapore five years ago after her sister, who found a job working at the airport, urged her to follow suit. "She told me that the work is good and the salary is much better than back home because you earn in Singapore dollars. It is also very safe, so I like it here," she said.

She is now also worried that the government will not renew her employment pass, as labour rules have been tightened following public unhappiness over the influx of foreigners.
Commuters walk inside the Raffles Place MRT station during rush hour at the central business district area on 13 February 2013 in Singapore Concerns about overcrowding have mounted in Singapore, which saw a 33% increase in population in a decade
People sit at bars along the Boat Quay in Singapore on 21 June 2013. Restaurants and bars have multiplied, fuelling the demand for service staff which is met partly by Filipinos
Grey line

_77256099_171039894%281%29.jpg


Singapore immigration

Worried about a fast-ageing society, Singapore has allowed in more foreigners over the past decade, increasing the population by 33% to 5.47 million.
The proportion of foreigners has nearly doubled to 29% in that same period.
Some Singaporeans have complained about crowded public transport, high housing prices, and a lack of good jobs. The citizen unemployment rate remains low at 3%.
Widespread unhappiness led to the ruling People's Action Party scoring its lowest-ever share of votes in the 2011 general election.
Since then the government has made it more difficult to hire cheap foreign labour, and incentivised productivity and innovation - but progress has been slow.
It also ramped up transport infrastructure and housing, and attempted to cool the property market.

Grey line

Tightening manpower rules

One way Singapore has tried to solve the labour crunch while placating the public's desire for fewer foreigners is outsourcing jobs to other countries.

In the Philippines, the Singapore government-linked company Keppel set up shipyards in Batangas and Subic Bay. Last year a government agency tasked to find opportunities for Singapore companies overseas set up an office in Manila.

"Instead of our workers coming here, Singaporeans can bring their jobs to other countries, to our labour centres," said Mr Morales.

But not all jobs can be sent offshore - and Singapore still needs to fill many job vacancies perceived as unattractive.

Meanwhile, Singaporeans still can't get enough of Leticia Bongnino - but her writers are acknowledging the changing times. In a recent sketch, she reeled off the names of fictional relatives working at a call centre, department store and café in Singapore.

Beaming, she said: "Now there are a lot of Filipinos in Singapore… Leticia is very happy as almost all my relatives are here."
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Sinkies fast becoming like the xenophobic White Lotus Sect in 19th century China. Too anti-foreigners.

1445263qc7cocc0kyfkxmp.jpg
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
So nice of Ah Loong.

Implant more brown skin Pinoys as his fav white skin FT pets need 'dick service'.

So now white dicks do not need to travel to Pinoy land or even Thailand for their 'dick service'. LoL
 

McDonaldsKid

Alfrescian
Loyal
I expected the article to cite some talented pinoys working in the fields of R&D, or top corporate bankers, or CEOs, etc. Instead, I only saw 'These days a Singaporean professional is likely to have Filipino colleagues. With many more taking up service sector jobs, he is also likely to be served by a Filipino at a restaurant, supermarket, or doctor's clinic.'. KNN like that also called talented.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Very good right, Sinkies? You give Pinoys jobs and typhoon aid... and to repay your kindness they mock and suan you for xenophobia. :rolleyes:
 

sochi2014

Alfrescian
Loyal
I like pinoys colleagues. They are beri chatty. And we talked whole day time passes easily. I suan back my Pinoy colleague all the time.
 

JohnTan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
pidcindposter23e.jpg


It's a very nice poster. I can't imagine why sinkies are so upset. If not for the pinoys, who will clean up your house, help you cheat on your wife, and provide good quality labour for a lower salary that sinkies cannot match both in salary and quality?
 

Ambulance

Alfrescian
Loyal
It's a very nice poster. I can't imagine why sinkies are so upset. If not for the pinoys, who will clean up your house, help you cheat on your wife, and provide good quality labour for a lower salary that sinkies cannot match both in salary and quality?

halo lim beh zho area cleaning ghang lui ah zua bi yi kilat leh
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=1]EX-ST JOURNALIST TESSA WONG NOW WORKS AT BBC BUT CRITICISES SINGAPOREANS[/h]
<!-- /.block --> <style>.node-article .field-name-link-line-above-tags{float: right;}.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;}</style> Post date:
29 Dec 2014 - 11:42pm





<ins id="aswift_0_expand" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-table; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><ins id="aswift_0_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><iframe name="aswift_0" width="336" height="280" id="aswift_0" frameBorder="0" marginWidth="0" marginHeight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowfullscreen="true" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></ins></ins>


Singaporeans are an irrational bunch of people whose anger are targeted specifically at Filipinos, if a BBC article today is to be believed.
"Amid increasing general resentment towards foreigners, a backlash towards Filipinos (among Singaporeans) has taken place," Tessa Wong wrote on the BBC.
"But anti-Filipino sentiment has continued to swirl online, culminating in a blog titled Blood Stained Singapore suggesting ways to abuse Filipinos, calling them "an infestation"," she continued.
If Tessa is to be believed, Singaporeans are m&d-slinging buggers full of contempt and hatred towards Filipinos.
After reading the BBC article, a casual reader would be led to ask, "But why are Singaporeans so irrational?"
Indeed, the article does nothing but continue to harp on Singaporeans' "anti-foreigner sentiment".
If the name Tessa rings a bell, that is because it does.
Tessa was a journalist with state-controlled media The Straits Times before jumping ship to BBC.
"Why has it become so hard to address the intolerance of foreigners?" Tessa asked in a Straits Times article she wrote last year.
Perhaps because of articles she wrote which constantly push the blame on Singaporeans, has she ever thought so?
"There needs to be further penetration into the discourse of xenophobia, pointing out misconceptions and fallacies, and addressing them in a substantial way,"she had also written in The Straits Times.
But her BBC article does nothing but the contrary.
"The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment here is a recent phenomenon, with increasing immigration triggering underlying anxieties, say observers," she wrote.
She also quoted sociologist Terence Chong as saying: "Over the decades, the ruling government has emphasised that we are a small island with a lack of natural resources."
"But this "survivalist rhetoric", meant to spur on citizens, has now had the inadvertent effect of creating resentment against foreigners who are seen as competition for limited resources," she added.
But what about "addressing the misconceptions in a substantial way", as she had also pointed out?
For example, has the emphasis on Singapore being "a small island with a lack of natural resources" and the "survivalist rhetoric" been overdone?
Should Singapore look towards a different economic model which stops harping on the vulnerability of Singapore but actually starts moving Singapore into becoming a high-skilled economy not reliant on cheap labour but on the knowledge-expertise of its workers here?
But Tessa does not question that.
Instead, she reinforces the anti-foreigner sentiment".
"Filipinos here said that Singaporeans have been accepting, although they are concerned about escalating anti-foreigner sentiment," she said.
But Tessa also said in The Straits Times last year, "Should we then allow people a free pass to indulge in hate speech, just because they feel they have good reasons to do so? Of course not.
"The truth is there can be no justification for hating another person for being a foreigner, and this kind of discriminatory behaviour should never be allowed to take root in a Singapore that has always been open and tolerant of many faiths and races," she added.
Then why the misunderstanding towards Singaporeans, Tessa?



<ins id="aswift_1_expand" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-table; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><ins id="aswift_1_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><iframe name="aswift_1" width="336" height="280" id="aswift_1" frameBorder="0" marginWidth="0" marginHeight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowfullscreen="true" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></ins></ins>


What if the "anti-foreigner sentiment" is due to Singaporeans feeling bullied, that they have lost job opportunities because of a government which has refused to enact job protection policies to protect Singaporean workers and has thus left Singaporeans feeling so insecure that they have turned their fears outwards, into anger?
And what if the allowance of cheap labour substitution has forced Singaporeans to survive on depressed wages, leaving them to fight tooth and nail to survive that this has resulted in them feeling naturally defensive?
Tessa does venture to explain how the fears have manifested: "Part of the problem is that Filipinos are willing to take on jobs for lower salaries, with working conditions unacceptable to Singaporeans."
But she falls short.
If the government has enacted job protection policies for local workers and implement minimum wage to prevent Singaporeans from falling into poverty, in addition to higher government spending to protect Singaporeans for their healthcare, education and retirement, would Singaporeans live in fear, and the resultant anger?
But Tessa does not explore these issues further, even as she said that such misconceptions needed to be addressed.
Where Tessa feels that people should not be given a "free pass to indulge in hate speech", her similarly indulgent attitude in self-righteousness chastising of Singaporeans is similarly mistaken.
Yes, this might be a piece that retorts the rhetoric propounded by Tessa but one cannot help but feel unfairly treated when she continues her attack on Singaporeans even as she writes for a foreign media and one which allows to her to exercise her speech more freely but also more critically.
When then does she continue to toe the government line?
Moreover, where she writes for BBC and portrays Singaporeans as nihilistic individuals who would go at no end to hate Filipinos, she is only doing Singaporeans a great disservice.
Where she criticises Singaporeans as being nationalistic, hasn't she also swung the other way?
Balance is in short order and where Singapore needs to move forward in the conversation being Singaporeans and foreigners, it does not help where one continues to only harp on a one-sided conversation but blame the other for what one does similarly as well.
Moreover, when she was writing for The Straits Times, her constant journalistic attacks on the opposition parties such as the Worker's Party and on online media, such as TRS, also serves little to move the conversation forward.
One wishes that where a local journalist has the opportunity in a renowned international media that one could more critically appraise Singaporeans to allow Singaporeans to have a fair hearing on the international stage.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sinkies fast becoming like the xenophobic White Lotus Sect in 19th century China. Too anti-foreigners.

Sinkees should step up their expression of unhappiness to foreigners to send the message that they are not welcome here. 167,000 jobs that could go to sinkees are now taken up by Pinoys. And the pinoys think that they have the right to be here.
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=1]EX-ST JOURNALIST TESSA WONG NOW WORKS AT BBC BUT CRITICISES SINGAPOREANS[/h]
<!-- /.block --> <style>.node-article .field-name-link-line-above-tags{float: right;}.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;}</style> Post date:
29 Dec 2014 - 11:42pm





<ins id="aswift_0_expand" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-table; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><ins id="aswift_0_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><iframe name="aswift_0" width="336" height="280" id="aswift_0" frameBorder="0" marginWidth="0" marginHeight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowfullscreen="true" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></ins></ins>


Singaporeans are an irrational bunch of people whose anger are targeted specifically at Filipinos, if a BBC article today is to be believed.
"Amid increasing general resentment towards foreigners, a backlash towards Filipinos (among Singaporeans) has taken place," Tessa Wong wrote on the BBC.
"But anti-Filipino sentiment has continued to swirl online, culminating in a blog titled Blood Stained Singapore suggesting ways to abuse Filipinos, calling them "an infestation"," she continued.
If Tessa is to be believed, Singaporeans are m&d-slinging buggers full of contempt and hatred towards Filipinos.
After reading the BBC article, a casual reader would be led to ask, "But why are Singaporeans so irrational?"
Indeed, the article does nothing but continue to harp on Singaporeans' "anti-foreigner sentiment".
If the name Tessa rings a bell, that is because it does.
Tessa was a journalist with state-controlled media The Straits Times before jumping ship to BBC.
"Why has it become so hard to address the intolerance of foreigners?" Tessa asked in a Straits Times article she wrote last year.
Perhaps because of articles she wrote which constantly push the blame on Singaporeans, has she ever thought so?
"There needs to be further penetration into the discourse of xenophobia, pointing out misconceptions and fallacies, and addressing them in a substantial way,"she had also written in The Straits Times.
But her BBC article does nothing but the contrary.
"The rise of anti-foreigner sentiment here is a recent phenomenon, with increasing immigration triggering underlying anxieties, say observers," she wrote.
She also quoted sociologist Terence Chong as saying: "Over the decades, the ruling government has emphasised that we are a small island with a lack of natural resources."
"But this "survivalist rhetoric", meant to spur on citizens, has now had the inadvertent effect of creating resentment against foreigners who are seen as competition for limited resources," she added.
But what about "addressing the misconceptions in a substantial way", as she had also pointed out?
For example, has the emphasis on Singapore being "a small island with a lack of natural resources" and the "survivalist rhetoric" been overdone?
Should Singapore look towards a different economic model which stops harping on the vulnerability of Singapore but actually starts moving Singapore into becoming a high-skilled economy not reliant on cheap labour but on the knowledge-expertise of its workers here?
But Tessa does not question that.
Instead, she reinforces the anti-foreigner sentiment".
"Filipinos here said that Singaporeans have been accepting, although they are concerned about escalating anti-foreigner sentiment," she said.
But Tessa also said in The Straits Times last year, "Should we then allow people a free pass to indulge in hate speech, just because they feel they have good reasons to do so? Of course not.
"The truth is there can be no justification for hating another person for being a foreigner, and this kind of discriminatory behaviour should never be allowed to take root in a Singapore that has always been open and tolerant of many faiths and races," she added.
Then why the misunderstanding towards Singaporeans, Tessa?



<ins id="aswift_1_expand" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-table; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><ins id="aswift_1_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><iframe name="aswift_1" width="336" height="280" id="aswift_1" frameBorder="0" marginWidth="0" marginHeight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowfullscreen="true" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></ins></ins>


What if the "anti-foreigner sentiment" is due to Singaporeans feeling bullied, that they have lost job opportunities because of a government which has refused to enact job protection policies to protect Singaporean workers and has thus left Singaporeans feeling so insecure that they have turned their fears outwards, into anger?
And what if the allowance of cheap labour substitution has forced Singaporeans to survive on depressed wages, leaving them to fight tooth and nail to survive that this has resulted in them feeling naturally defensive?
Tessa does venture to explain how the fears have manifested: "Part of the problem is that Filipinos are willing to take on jobs for lower salaries, with working conditions unacceptable to Singaporeans."
But she falls short.
If the government has enacted job protection policies for local workers and implement minimum wage to prevent Singaporeans from falling into poverty, in addition to higher government spending to protect Singaporeans for their healthcare, education and retirement, would Singaporeans live in fear, and the resultant anger?
But Tessa does not explore these issues further, even as she said that such misconceptions needed to be addressed.
Where Tessa feels that people should not be given a "free pass to indulge in hate speech", her similarly indulgent attitude in self-righteousness chastising of Singaporeans is similarly mistaken.
Yes, this might be a piece that retorts the rhetoric propounded by Tessa but one cannot help but feel unfairly treated when she continues her attack on Singaporeans even as she writes for a foreign media and one which allows to her to exercise her speech more freely but also more critically.
When then does she continue to toe the government line?
Moreover, where she writes for BBC and portrays Singaporeans as nihilistic individuals who would go at no end to hate Filipinos, she is only doing Singaporeans a great disservice.
Where she criticises Singaporeans as being nationalistic, hasn't she also swung the other way?
Balance is in short order and where Singapore needs to move forward in the conversation being Singaporeans and foreigners, it does not help where one continues to only harp on a one-sided conversation but blame the other for what one does similarly as well.
Moreover, when she was writing for The Straits Times, her constant journalistic attacks on the opposition parties such as the Worker's Party and on online media, such as TRS, also serves little to move the conversation forward.
One wishes that where a local journalist has the opportunity in a renowned international media that one could more critically appraise Singaporeans to allow Singaporeans to have a fair hearing on the international stage.

We need more articles by Tessa then ...spread the word that sinkees don't welcome foreigners and that sinkapore is a hell hole for them. I will celebrate if 2 million foreigners leave our island and no other foreigner will want to live here.
 
Top