• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Why do we have a reactive garmen?

sochi2014

Alfrescian
Loyal
Only respond to knee jerk reaction?

2r6jkec.png
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Why was the LRT even built in the first place? It's an eyesore and an inefficient way to get around. :rolleyes:
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
ah loon has oredi proudly announced dat he got no 4site n despite dat, justifiably deserve his million $ salary ...

iz perfectly alrite n fashionable 2 oso haf wat ur gr8 leader has ...
 

zhihau

Super Moderator
SuperMod
Asset
ah loon has oredi proudly announced dat he got no 4site n despite dat, justifiably deserve his million $ salary

That ain't a type of reactive gahmen, that's a jiak liao bee type of gahmen.
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
please dont waste public money

http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/thai-teen-loses-appeal-lawsuit-against-smrt-lta

In dismissing Ms Nitcharee’s appeal, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon — who heard the appeal with Judges of Appeal Chao Hick Tin and Andrew Phang — agreed with the ruling of trial judge Vinodh Coomaraswamy, that the failure to provide platform screen doors at Ang Mo Kio MRT station when the accident occurred was not a breach of standard of care. The installation of platform screen doors at above-ground stations was completed in March 2012.

The trial judge had found that SMRT and the LTA were not negligent as the safety features in place when Ms Nitcharee fell onto the tracks were sufficient to keep the MRT station reasonably safe.

Ms Nitcharee’s lawyer Peter Low had argued that SMRT and the LTA knew of the risk of people falling onto the train tracks, with 30 cases of track intrusions between 2004 and 2010 where a commuter is on the tracks the same time as an oncoming train. It did not matter if the falls were intentional or unintentional; the entities should have done more, he said.

But CJ Menon said there was a need to distinguish between the risk of unintentional and intentional track intrusions.

He noted that 87 per cent of track intrusions between 1998 and 2008 were intentional. Based on this statistic, it would make about three of the 30 cases cited by Mr Low unintentional track intrusions, he said. And of these, the risk of a wholly spontaneous collapse not involving crowds or pushing by others — as in the case of Ms Nitcharee — may be even more limited, although data was not available, CJ Menon added.

Her case was undoubtedly tragic but, as noted by Justice Coomaraswamy, the law of negligence awards compensation based on a defendant’s culpability and not simply because a plaintiff has suffered harm, he said.

--
according to judge lemon, these girls r just money grabbing type.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
please dont waste public money

http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/thai-teen-loses-appeal-lawsuit-against-smrt-lta

In dismissing Ms Nitcharee’s appeal, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon — who heard the appeal with Judges of Appeal Chao Hick Tin and Andrew Phang — agreed with the ruling of trial judge Vinodh Coomaraswamy, that the failure to provide platform screen doors at Ang Mo Kio MRT station when the accident occurred was not a breach of standard of care. The installation of platform screen doors at above-ground stations was completed in March 2012.


The London underground carries far more passengers and I've never seen platform doors there in my life.

I did a google image search of "Swiss railway stations" and none of the images that came up showed any platform doors.

If the Ang Mohs can run a safe train system without platform doors, why do sinkies need the extra protection? Is it because sinkies have lower IQs? worse eyesight? a poorer sense of balance? inferior motor skills?... or are they just grossly inferior in all departments?

Z%C3%BCrich_Stadelhofen_in_2006.jpg
 

freedalas

Alfrescian
Loyal
The London underground carries far more passengers and I've never seen platform doors there in my life.

I did a google image search of "Swiss railway stations" and none of the images that came up showed any platform doors.

If the Ang Mohs can run a safe train system without platform doors, why do sinkies need the extra protection? Is it because sinkies have lower IQs? worse eyesight? a poorer sense of balance? inferior motor skills?... or are they just grossly inferior in all departments?

Z%C3%BCrich_Stadelhofen_in_2006.jpg

It is because Singaporeans' lives are very precious unlike the chao angmohs in London or Switzerland. Hence, every precaution has to be taken to preserve Singaporeans' lives whereas the chao angmohs can all die as they are worthless.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
sinkies have magnetic personalities and are highly attracted to exposed metallic guard rails and railway tracks. without platform doors, incidences of sinkies getting propelled and stuck on railway tracks will becum daily nuisances. it takes the definition of chic magnet to a whole new level. :p
 

garlic

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The top men in the cabinet are all ex armed forces guys. As we all know from SAF, the culture is dont screw up instead of effecting change. Therefore, the less one do, the lesser chances of screwing up, hence you get this reactive garmen..

Not only that, the population has been tuned to play it safe and don't deviate from the tried and "true" way of life.. hence the madness on academic focus and nothing else..
 

tanwahp

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Ms Nitcharee’s lawyer Peter Low had argued that SMRT and the LTA knew of the risk of people falling onto the train tracks, with 30 cases of track intrusions between 2004 and 2010 where a commuter is on the tracks the same time as an oncoming train.

Peter Low and M Ravi must have lost the most number of cases in Singapore history as they are taking on cases against the PAP government.
 

tanwahp

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The London underground carries far more passengers and I've never seen platform doors there in my life.

I did a google image search of "Swiss railway stations" and none of the images that came up showed any platform doors.

If the Ang Mohs can run a safe train system without platform doors, why do sinkies need the extra protection? Is it because sinkies have lower IQs? worse eyesight? a poorer sense of balance? inferior motor skills?... or are they just grossly inferior in all departments?

Isn't this a safety barrier in France, you twit?

040504.jpg


Isn't this a case of falling on tracks in London, you twit?

http://www.boston.com/news/world/eu...l-bystander/FvpnmYcvar4TVvmSZgQK7M/story.html
 

Hans168

Alfrescian
Loyal
reactive mgmt is hallmark of screwed up govt.... remember they always ask for ideas but come to pay, they din ask but take most available - highest paid in the world
 

Hans168

Alfrescian
Loyal
Peter Low and M Ravi must have lost the most number of cases in Singapore history as they are taking on cases against the PAP government.

how come Davinder Singh wins most of the time???????????????????? Were the judges afraid to be screwed by the bayee??????????
 
Top