u wont be surprised that the boundary of AMK GRC be extended
all the way to Iskandar
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
PAP60 Rally: Next GE Will Be "Deadly Serious ight"
- Thread starter xingguy
- Start date
u wont be surprised that the boundary of AMK GRC be extended
all the way to Iskandar
using words like deadly means?
is this again another hooligan's threat and blackmail?
is this again another hooligan's threat and blackmail?
It obvious PAP is raising the stake by claiming they are in danger of losing power while WP is deliberately lowering the bar by campigning on the premises that they dont have the intention to takeover the govt (for the moment) but merely working towards a more even parliament to provide checks and balance.
To simply put it, WP wants to contest in the 50kg category while PAP the 100kg boxer wants the 50kg boxer WP to fight under the 100kg category.
By putting the right to govern in the line of fire, PAP is hitting opposition in 2 ways.
1. Opposition inability to offer an alternative government to replace PAP.
2. Capitalise on voters cold feet snydrome in order to make them adopt a more cautious approach when comes to casting their votes and even u-turn knowing that there is a realistic chance that PAP might lose power.
To simply put it, WP wants to contest in the 50kg category while PAP the 100kg boxer wants the 50kg boxer WP to fight under the 100kg category.
By putting the right to govern in the line of fire, PAP is hitting opposition in 2 ways.
1. Opposition inability to offer an alternative government to replace PAP.
2. Capitalise on voters cold feet snydrome in order to make them adopt a more cautious approach when comes to casting their votes and even u-turn knowing that there is a realistic chance that PAP might lose power.
Me thinks the spinmeister has got it all wrong again....the argument that having more opposition members means more checks implies that the PAP doesnt want checks because it is all a waste of their time better spent governing the country.
But they go all out to cripple the opposition and crush dissenting views instead of governing the country....they should just spend all their energy and resources to tackle head on the problems and bread and butter issues that afflict the non elite electorate.
predicting sg election seems easy but it is still largely guesswork. there are no opinion polls to show the pap and opposition support statistics and give us an idea of how the election will play out. for the outsiders, everything is mostly just guesswork and speculation.
If the pappies would, they would have done so long ago. It's much easier to fix the opposition rather than fixing the country's problems.
No, the reason why the pappies don't want to relinquish power is because there are many behind-the-scenes dirty deeds which can only be concealed in a one party system of government.
There are plenty of redundant PAP MPs right now that aren't doing much but drawing their obscene pay, for example LKY, GCT, WKS,..... LKY is a a 90+ & waiting to die. He might have isome pull with the older generation but many of them are unhappy that they can't touch their CPF.
So who are these 100kg boxers
If the pappies would, they would have done so long ago. It's much easier to fix the opposition rather than fixing the country's problems.
No, the reason why the pappies don't want to relinquish power is because there are many behind-the-scenes dirty deeds which can only be concealed in a one party system of government.
Half a decade of one party rule, the many behind-the-scenes dirty deeds have now snowballed to a point tantamount to that of dismount from riding a tiger (骑虎难下).
Only PAP has the resources to know and I am sure they do conduct internal straw poll to gauge the level of support from time to time. For us, we can only get an idea whether the the ground is sweet or sour but what we don't know is how bad or good the numbers are.
For sure we know level of support for PAP is eroding and this is the reason why lhl had to sound the note of caution that PAP might lose power in order to deter voters who would otherwise vote opposition. If the level of support is strong, there is no need to say such thing. In the past when support for PAP was sky high, words like 'never threaten us with your votes', 'we are deaf to criticisms', 'anything below 70% would be a failure'...etc see whether any PAP leader dare to utter such thing now.
Re: PM: Opposition doesn’t articulate a vision for S’pore
Sibei farnie, ....cannot reconcile his logic......granted that parliament is a subset of government....but is it not parliament debates and provide the directions and objectives for which the government agencies formulate policies and execute to meet those objectives
Want to dig also please don't dig wrong hole lah.....
Sibei farnie, ....cannot reconcile his logic......granted that parliament is a subset of government....but is it not parliament debates and provide the directions and objectives for which the government agencies formulate policies and execute to meet those objectives
Want to dig also please don't dig wrong hole lah.....
Re: PM: Opposition doesn’t articulate a vision for S’pore
I can understand Lee is just doing his job to rally the morale of PAP members. But most people expect that not only is it impossible to win back the 3 constituencies, at least one more GRC is in danger of falling.
Lee said the government acknowledges problems publicly and deal with them. It is fine to acknowledge, but I certainly don't see a number of problems dealt with for decades.
Sim Lim Square has faced bad reputation for years and it is only because of media tools that cases were recorded, compared to the past where people would be advised by friends to avoid Sim Lim based on hearsay. The laws to protect consumers have been weak for decades. CASE has been around for more than 20 years and it is only now that Lim Biow Chuan wants more powers.
If PAP acknowledges these problems for decades, PAP is effectively reminding us of their incompetence, then why should I vote for them.
I can understand Lee is just doing his job to rally the morale of PAP members. But most people expect that not only is it impossible to win back the 3 constituencies, at least one more GRC is in danger of falling.
Lee said the government acknowledges problems publicly and deal with them. It is fine to acknowledge, but I certainly don't see a number of problems dealt with for decades.
Sim Lim Square has faced bad reputation for years and it is only because of media tools that cases were recorded, compared to the past where people would be advised by friends to avoid Sim Lim based on hearsay. The laws to protect consumers have been weak for decades. CASE has been around for more than 20 years and it is only now that Lim Biow Chuan wants more powers.
If PAP acknowledges these problems for decades, PAP is effectively reminding us of their incompetence, then why should I vote for them.
Aiyoh, don't you get it? That's exactly what they don't want to do mah..........................
Tackling the bread and butter issues of the ordinary singaporean is simply not their mentality and priority.
Tackling the bread and butter issues of the ordinary singaporean is simply not their mentality and priority.
Re: My prediction on Aljunied GRC
He will be stupid if he say PAP will win the constituencies back in the next election. If he doesn't, he will be challenged to step down.
What he said was PAP will do its best to win back those places and this will take years but they will try like for Sitoh in Potong Pasir.
If he acknowledges it will take years, it definitely can't be 2016. I don't mind if it takes as long as Potong Pasir because that took 27 years. In 20 years, more than these 7 seats will be captured by the opposition.
He will be stupid if he say PAP will win the constituencies back in the next election. If he doesn't, he will be challenged to step down.
What he said was PAP will do its best to win back those places and this will take years but they will try like for Sitoh in Potong Pasir.
If he acknowledges it will take years, it definitely can't be 2016. I don't mind if it takes as long as Potong Pasir because that took 27 years. In 20 years, more than these 7 seats will be captured by the opposition.
Re: My prediction on Aljunied GRC
According to Maximilian Chua-Heng aka Clone, why would PAP want to take back Aljunied GRC?
According to Maximilian Chua-Heng aka Clone, why would PAP want to take back Aljunied GRC?
Similar threads
