-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Know The Truth
- Thread starter TracyTan866
- Start date
that seems equitable...
Our ability to spend is dependent on our income. When median take-home pay is $1700, there's not a lot of money left for discretionary spending.
I'm very pissed off the election cum ntuc loser is put in Keppel corp to suck its profits further. Keppel corp is a good company screwed up by cronies.
Serving SG must come from their hearts. No point compelling them to agree to bring down their salaries to $500k or $300k when they can arbitrarily pay themselves a bonus of 6mths or 12 months or 18months without having to declare it
These people are pure greed
no such thing as equitable when they can pay themselves bonuses without declaring it to the people
no purchase power. that's why many businesses are failing as the pap has sucked out all the money from the economy...high rentals, high hdb prices, hi car prices, hi transportation costs, hi erp, gst, maid levies, etc.
Your translation abit salah. It's good things come, bad things go
you are correct..
.Good come, bad go, heaven lingling, earth lingling
the pap uses GLCs for their own agenda to reward their cronies.
Lim Boon Heng is Chairman, TH. Is that meritocracy?
Lee Boon Yang is Chairman, SPH. Is that meritocracy?
Every Singaporeans must know how the pap uses GLCs and TLCs to reward its own people. Every Singaporean should be rightly pissed off
Well, unless they stop military ex. in Oz; which is 5 planes load 1 way.
Emirates is doing well.
Yes; that is why they are BIG F1 sponsors. And so are the other MEast airlines.
some airlines are bleeding more than others.
On the passenger side, problem with sia is that it depends a lot on business class and 1st class passengers and it relies a lot on USA and Europe markets. when USA and Europe don't do well economically, SIA falters.
Wage wise, SIA carries a lot of dead weight on its payroll.
Competition wise, SIA cant compete with Emirates, Etihad and Qatar on the long routes
Price wise, SIA is expensive
Increased competition from Jet Star, and other budget airlines has chipped off SIA's market in Australia. SIA is trying to do a monopoly with ANZ to the NZ market and the price to these destinations is atrocious. Silly strategy and the passengers will nopt forget this when the NZ market is liberalised
Some unwise management decisions in fuel hedging have cost SIA big money.
So I see strong headwinds for sia
Emirates is very pryce competitive and its service is good.
So are Qatar and Etihad.
That's why sia is in trouble
yes, yes, yes!!
why do you think sia is not doing well when Emirates, Qatar, Etihad are doing ok?
Yesterday I watched CNA documentary on woman pilot. SIA don't have woman pilots, only Silkair. Not equal employer and not progressing with times.
Similar threads
