The angmo has already been identified legally as the father. Even if he were to fuck and forget, there is nothing to stop the mercenary woman from coming to him for child financial support later.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Shotgun Marriage SPG Ran Away from Ang Moh Hubby Who Wanted Pre-Nuptial Agreement
- Thread starter makapaaa
- Start date
You mean your kid is also your sibling??
I knew incest is accepted in Malay culture but I did not know it ran so deep... You guys are real champion... you can go one-on-one with the Rocky Mountains hillbillies in the "screw your mommas and sistas" stakes....
Last edited:
Not married, so cannot fight for child support.
Because an asian man will not want damaged goods
Women don't want fairness. They want to extract the maximum utility from men.
Also, even if she signs it, in future if the relationship falls apart she can always go to the Family Court and claim that she was 'forced to sign the prenup under duress' or cook up a story about how you were 'an abusive husband'. Guess who the Family Court is going to side with?
That's why I say: avoid marriage. Too much hassle. When it comes to women: pump them and dump them.
Is she stupid or what ? Signing a pre nup before maRRIAGE is very normal thing to do. After decade shelter under Women's Charter, she decide that pre-nup agreement is not for her.
Of course, modern wants to have the best of both World. Got fuck, got kids and wants lots of alimony from men. Such a good deal. Why exchange a pre-nup agreement with ang mo trash ?
Question remains, why she ran away with the kid ?
Of course, modern wants to have the best of both World. Got fuck, got kids and wants lots of alimony from men. Such a good deal. Why exchange a pre-nup agreement with ang mo trash ?
Question remains, why she ran away with the kid ?
That's obvious. As a bargaining chip. He wants to see the kid, well, he will have to pay for the privilege.
Rich Ang mo can fuck again and get women to bear his kids. Why do you need to see this kid from this women ? Sooner or later, he will forget.
BTW, what is she so different from a Prostitute ? I find Prostitute has much more honor then this women. I find Prostitute has much more dignity.
See? sinkie shit are nothing but liability..
Ang moh smart and first world.. prevent a sinkie from coming to his life... Every sinkie male should do this but too bad, when you are ball-less, you are fucked.
Case involves S'pore woman, Aussie exec and the child they had while together in HK
A Singaporean woman met an Australian executive while working in Hong Kong, and they had a child before deciding to marry.
But on their way to the wedding ceremony on June 21, she was shocked when he sprung a pre-nuptial agreement on her.
They quarrelled, she called off the wedding and, two days later, whisked their 18-month-old daughter back to Singapore without telling him - leading to a cross-border custody battle.
In cases involving toddlers born out of wedlock, custody usually goes to the mother. But this time, the father wants the child to live with him, and has accused the mother of taking the girl from her home in Hong Kong.
This month, the man obtained a court order in Hong Kong giving him rights as the father.
But the mother, who is currently in Singapore with their child, insists that Singapore is the appropriate venue for any custody battle and has filed court papers here for a hearing.
Hong Kong judge Chu Pui Ying, who heard the father's application, ruled that their names must remain private.
The woman (M), a psychologist, moved to Hong Kong in 2008 for work. Two years later, she met the man in a bar in Lan Kwai Fong, and they started to date.
They broke up twice due to her temper, claimed the man, who started working in Hong Kong in 2009 for an insurance group.
But they continued to see each other, she gave birth last May, and they went on to fix a wedding date.
Both sides had invited family and friends for what should have been their happy day, complete with a celebration brunch.
However, the pre-nuptial issue "regrettably" triggered the quarrel which derailed the wedding plans on the very day, noted Judge Chu in her judgement grounds released last Tuesday.
The woman informed the man that she was leaving Hong Kong just before boarding her flight to Singapore with the child. She sent him a text message.
Talks between the pair to take the child back to Hong Kong broke down.
The man then went to court in August.
The Hong Kong judge found that M did not dispute that the man was the father, and also failed to prove "why he should not have all the rights and authority that the law would allow him as father if the child were legitimate".
The woman, who did not attend the hearing, insisted that Singapore was where the case should be heard, since she and the child are Singaporean.
But the judge was not convinced, pointing out that the baby had been living in Singapore for only a few months, had an Australian passport, and was born and entitled to Hong Kong residence.
She also refused the woman's request that the father's access to the child be supervised.
The judge noted that the man had taken garden leave between jobs to look after the girl for six weeks this year, and had also taken her on holiday to Nicaragua when she was only several months old, without M or any helper.
The Hong Kong court also made the child its ward until further notice - which means it will rule on custody and other key matters brought up by either parent relating to the child.
A Singaporean woman met an Australian executive while working in Hong Kong, and they had a child before deciding to marry.
But on their way to the wedding ceremony on June 21, she was shocked when he sprung a pre-nuptial agreement on her.
They quarrelled, she called off the wedding and, two days later, whisked their 18-month-old daughter back to Singapore without telling him - leading to a cross-border custody battle.
In cases involving toddlers born out of wedlock, custody usually goes to the mother. But this time, the father wants the child to live with him, and has accused the mother of taking the girl from her home in Hong Kong.
This month, the man obtained a court order in Hong Kong giving him rights as the father.
But the mother, who is currently in Singapore with their child, insists that Singapore is the appropriate venue for any custody battle and has filed court papers here for a hearing.
Hong Kong judge Chu Pui Ying, who heard the father's application, ruled that their names must remain private.
The woman (M), a psychologist, moved to Hong Kong in 2008 for work. Two years later, she met the man in a bar in Lan Kwai Fong, and they started to date.
They broke up twice due to her temper, claimed the man, who started working in Hong Kong in 2009 for an insurance group.
But they continued to see each other, she gave birth last May, and they went on to fix a wedding date.
Both sides had invited family and friends for what should have been their happy day, complete with a celebration brunch.
However, the pre-nuptial issue "regrettably" triggered the quarrel which derailed the wedding plans on the very day, noted Judge Chu in her judgement grounds released last Tuesday.
The woman informed the man that she was leaving Hong Kong just before boarding her flight to Singapore with the child. She sent him a text message.
Talks between the pair to take the child back to Hong Kong broke down.
The man then went to court in August.
The Hong Kong judge found that M did not dispute that the man was the father, and also failed to prove "why he should not have all the rights and authority that the law would allow him as father if the child were legitimate".
The woman, who did not attend the hearing, insisted that Singapore was where the case should be heard, since she and the child are Singaporean.
But the judge was not convinced, pointing out that the baby had been living in Singapore for only a few months, had an Australian passport, and was born and entitled to Hong Kong residence.
She also refused the woman's request that the father's access to the child be supervised.
The judge noted that the man had taken garden leave between jobs to look after the girl for six weeks this year, and had also taken her on holiday to Nicaragua when she was only several months old, without M or any helper.
The Hong Kong court also made the child its ward until further notice - which means it will rule on custody and other key matters brought up by either parent relating to the child.
Similar threads
