• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP to make it easier for FT spouses to get jobs in S'pore- what fucking traitors

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
If the PAP did the same things for sinkies as they do for their FT pets, they will be the most popular govt in the world, bu they are just sell outs to their own country.

New measures to help Singapore-foreigner couples

Under new measures announced by the MSF and ICA, it will be faster for foreign spouses of Singaporeans to get a Long Term Visit Pass, and easier for them to secure employment.



SINGAPORE: More measures have been introduced to help couples in which one spouse is a Singaporean and the other a foreigner to better plan for their future, the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) and the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority (ICA) announced on Friday (Oct 24).

From January next year, the process of applying for a Long Term Visit Pass (LTVP) will be revised. Couples are encouraged to jointly submit an application for a Letter of LTVP Eligibility, which will be valid for a year, before getting married. The couple can then use the letter to support their application for an LTVP after marriage.

Under this process, the wait for the issuance of an LTVP will be reduced to up to six weeks, instead of six months or more for couples who only submit their application after marriage.

According to the MSF and ICA, the joint application will "help prospective spouses have sufficient pertinent information about each other before committing to a marriage".

The move will also provide greater clarity, prior to marriage, on whether the foreign spouse qualifies for a long-term stay in Singapore, based on the circumstances of the couple at the time of the LTVP application.

The LTVP allows a foreign spouse to stay in Singapore for one year, before the pass needs to be renewed again.

EASIER FOR FOREIGN SPOUSES TO GET A JOB

It will also be easier for spouses on LTVP to seek employment. The Manpower Ministry will issue a Letter of Consent, tied to the LTVP, to foreign spouses who want to secure employment.


Such spouses will not be counted against the foreign worker quota and employers need not fork out a foreign worker levy to hire them.

Upon the issuance of a Letter of Consent, the validity of the foreign spouse's LTVP will be extended to two years upon renewal of the pass.

However, the ICA and MSF said that marriage to a Singaporean does not automatically qualify a foreigner for a long-term stay in Singapore.

"All applications will be assessed on a set of prevailing criteria, including the ability of the Singaporean sponsor to support and look after the family," the authorities said.
 

gatehousethetinkertailor

Alfrescian
Loyal
i am quite certain this journalist has got it all wrong or has been too lazy to check the press release against the ICA website.

This system of applying for LTVP already exists and is usually processed under six weeks not 6 months. In fact he completely fails to mention LTVP plus which was announced a few years ago:

http://www.ica.gov.sg/page.aspx?pageid=175&secid=171

http://www.ica.gov.sg/news_details.aspx?nid=12665


The only difference from January 2015 appears to be actually more sinister because the LTVP is approved by ICA anyway and MOM approves the LC - it implies that before you get married you can already suss out whether your prospective bride can live in Singapore long-term and if she fails to get pre-approval then you should not marry her. If she succeeds in getting her LTVP she can work but if she secures work she has to give up her LTVP and exchange it for a work pass (or similar) and this will probably count against her chances of applying for PR or citizenship.

Just when you thought they would try and stop this social engineering shite.

It also seems to be targeted at reducing the number of local Singkies getting hitched to brides from China, Vietnam and Philippines and also our local Minahs marrying Egyptians, Turks and other 3rd world Muslims. It already applies to new citizens from India who typically will want to bring in brides from India.

The dominant factor is assessing the viability of your spouse's application is your education, job, income and whether you have been paying taxes and have CPF - you can extract this from the types of documents requested for verification. If you are the typical $2k a month singkie, then you can expect to get rejected even before you try to get married.
 
Last edited:

hofmann

Alfrescian
Loyal
i am quite certain this journalist has got it all wrong. This system of applying for LTVP already exists and is usually processed under six weeks not 6 months. In fact he completely fails to mention LTVP plus which was announced a few years ago:

http://www.ica.gov.sg/page.aspx?pageid=175&secid=171

http://www.ica.gov.sg/news_details.aspx?nid=12665


The only difference from January 2015 appears to be actually more sinister because the LTVP is approved by ICA anyway and MOM approves the LC - it implies that before you get married you can already suss out whether your prospective bride cannot live in Singapore and if she fails to get pre-approval then you should not marry her. Just when you thought they would try and stop this social engineering shite.

I suspect this is an attempt to clamp down on marriages of convenience where many Asian brides enter into fake marriages with locals to get their ltvp under the existing scheme
 

gatehousethetinkertailor

Alfrescian
Loyal
There is no actual "clamping down" because the LTVP scheme already exists in the form being reported sans the "pre-vetting" which is why I believe this Journo was just too lazy to check - the existing FAQ from 2012 already highlights all these points.
 
Top