• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Would you trust a lawyer who gather evidence using hearsay?

Isogallardo

Alfrescian
Loyal
This woman is a practising lawyer sia...how can someone bring tia gong evidence to court?!


1979593_731482716889035_2601416082543213507_n.jpg
 

sochi2014

Alfrescian
Loyal
Garmens around the world are like that. Always put obstacles in front of you when you want to do something which doesn't violate the ten commandments.

Makes us wonder why do we still need to support them with our tax dollars.

They have evolved into something so complex by having so much bureaucracy.

Mutterficken wants me to go to one department just to get some document and shove it to another department. Just because they want to collect some money from you.

But when your status change and contradicted some regulations. All of a sudden the different departments amazingly could talk to one another without external involvement from the public.

Assholes! Damn bloody irritating.
 

Satyr

Alfrescian
Loyal
@Issogallardo.
Kindly use your brain. Sylvia was explaining the motivation for her action. She and reason to believe she needed to initiate communication with the NEA. What evidence does she need to produce ? As a lawyer she was exercising prudence in doing so. The prosecution is dragging out what is known as a red herring.
 
Top