Ravi wants police to return HHH's notebook by Wednesday 4pm

Ravi letter to SPF: seizure of notebook unlawful & breach of HH's rights

Today, M Ravi wrote another strongly worded letter to the Police emphasising that they had no right to seize her notebook and they were acting unlawfully.

He referred to the statement of a Police Spokesperson as quoted by the Straits Times, which claimed that the police had seized the notebook under section 35(1)(c) of the Criminal Procedure Code but he rebutted this argument saying this law was inapplicable.

Under Section 35, police can only seize property which is suspected to be evidence of an offence.

As Ms Han was only taking notes of the questions police had asked her, her notes could not be considered evidence of any offence. Therefore, Section 35 did not apply and the police had “seriously infringed” Ms Han’s rights.

Here is the full letter sent to the Police by M Ravi:

http://therealsingapore.com/content...ok-was-unlawful-and-serious-breach-her-rights

Re: M ravi: Seizure of ms han’s notebook was unlawful and a serious breach of her rig

In the first place, the police needs to convince the public that an offence has been committed. For example, why not the police strip searches her and gives some lame reason that it suspects her body constitutes evidence of the offence? Or trying drinking her pee to find out if it tastes like urine or not because it suspects her urine constitutes evidence of the offence? Or arrest her boy-friend and parents because it suspects they constitute evidence of an offence or better still, confiscate her home and freeze her bank account because it suspects to constitute the offence?

Re: M ravi: Seizure of ms han’s notebook was unlawful and a serious breach of her rig

The Sinkie poodles are the paid uniformed thugs of the Leegime.

Re: M ravi: Seizure of ms han’s notebook was unlawful and a serious breach of her rig

Sinkie said:

In the first place, the police needs to convince the public that an offence has been committed. For example, why not the police strip searches her and gives some lame reason that it suspects her body constitutes evidence of the offence? Or trying drinking her pee to find out if it tastes like urine or not because it suspects her urine constitutes evidence of the offence? Or arrest her boy-friend and parents because it suspects they constitute evidence of an offence or better still, confiscate her home and freeze her bank account because it suspects to constitute the offence?

Click to expand...

knn, write so many examples for what
"did the note taking constitute an offence for it to be confiscated as evidence"?
was that what you wanted to say the saying?

Re: M ravi: Seizure of ms han’s notebook was unlawful and a serious breach of her rig

Semaj2357 said:

knn, write so many examples for what
"did the note taking constitute an offence for it to be confiscated as evidence"?
was that what you wanted to say the saying?

Click to expand...

NO! And I'm appalled that after I gave so explicit examples, you still don't get it.

Read your sentence again. It makes no sense at all.

Leongsam said:

And what if the police aren't scared of Ravi and refuse to comply?

What sort of retribution is in store for them?

Click to expand...

they will return at 5pm instead of the demanded 4pm to save face

Re: M ravi: Seizure of ms han’s notebook was unlawful and a serious breach of her rig

Sinkie said:

NO! And I'm appalled that after I gave so explicit examples, you still don't get it.

Read your sentence again. It makes no sense at all.

Click to expand...

hokay, i'll go check and taste the urine then...may also check her huihui if got time