• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING OF T

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=1]NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING OF THE PROTEST[/h]
Post date:
11 Oct 2014 - 8:04pm








At least 8 participants of the Return Our CPF protest were summoned down to the Police Cantonment Complex and told to attend interviews about their involvement in the protest last month which clashed with a Charity event.

The police interrogated the participants for between 2 to 5 hours with protest organiser Ms Han Hui Hui interrogated for 8 hours.
The Police had been questioning the participants as they believed a case of unlawful assembly had occurred.

This is despite the fact that Ms Han had applied for a permit and been approved to hold a protest and march around Hong Lim Park previously.

The problem was that this permit was apparently revoked on the morning of the protest.

Those who were brought down for questioning were asked if they knew that the permit had been revoked and were also asked about their relationships with the chief organiser Ms Han Hui Hui and also protest speaker Mr Roy Ngerng.

The revoking of the permit had apparently happened just hours before the Protest was to occur at Hong Lim Park.

Ms Han Hui Hui had been approached by several men in plain clothes with one man claiming to be the Director of NParks.

The men had failed to properly identify themselves as the man claiming to be the NParks director could only show his NParks namecard which did not indicate that he was the director.

As only the commissioner has the right to revoke the permit if there has been a breach of the terms and conditions, the protesters were not informed correctly that the permit had been revoked.






Despite the obvious lack of official paperwork or identification, it seems that the police have considered this exchange to have been the revocation of the permit and have therefore decided that the protest was an unlawful gathering.

However, if the police, who were also present at the protest in plain clothes, had known that the permit was indeed revoked at that point, why didn’t they inform the participants of the illegal status of the protest to stop it from occurring in the first place?
If the permit had indeed been revoked at that point, why didn’t police and NParks act immediately instead of only taking action to interrogate and intimidate the participants two weeks later?

By this time, the mainstream media and many PAP MPs and ministers have taken the chance to throw m&d at the protesters and Ms Han for “heckling” special needs children. If the police had really been aware from the start, why wasn’t action taken any sooner?

It seems that the Police may just be trying to put more pressure on the activists seeing as they had gathered a lot of support. This whole incident casts doubts on the purpose of the police. If they wanted to prevent an unlawful assembly, they could have told the protesters on the day to move on as they were not permitted to gather.
 

tanwahtiu

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

It is coming to a situation where blood will be needed to resolve the CPF issue.

患乱出英雄
:biggrin:


[h=1]NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING OF THE PROTEST[/h]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

It is coming to a situation where blood will be needed to resolve the CPF issue.

患乱出英雄
:biggrin:

if there is a used tampon march by triple H, will tin tin be there to pick up the trail?
 

LEGEND

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

If revoked already, why the NPark rusty face kotek still telling them where they can do their activities. :oIo:
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

If revoked already, why the NPark rusty face kotek still telling them where they can do their activities. :oIo:

His loyalty will be richly rewarded.
 

xingguy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

[h=1]NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING OF THE PROTEST[/h]

Thought this kind news can only come from PRC or North Korea :eek:

If the scums in white can spin this issue even in the face of hard evidence showing otherwise, shrudder to think that some of us still trust them with our CPF.

Think carefully before you vote in the next GE!!

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/c8CP3SSDvBA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

10636131_718036784948019_7205994810686233169_n.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

as if i hv not warn... the pap scums cannot b trusted with $.
 

wendychan

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

If revoked already, why the NPark rusty face kotek still telling them where they can do their activities. :oIo:
i ask the same

but we are suppsoe to be stupid
 

khunking

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

Not too long ago there was an unlawful assembly of 400. How long did the interrogation take?
 

Reddog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

If revoked already, why the NPark rusty face kotek still telling them where they can do their activities. :oIo:

This really is the proof that the whole "revoke" game is just a game. Sinkies are assumed to be idiots.
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

Now vile pappies resorting to 'backdating'?
This type of scams only run by dishonest insurance agents, car salesmen etc.....
Vile pappies bankrupt of ideas to fix dissidents?
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

Lanjiao lah, last minute revoke? Even if you cancel or postpone your IPPT you also need to do it 24 hours in advance.

Protests or any other event require lots of logistics and planning... you think it's like a spontaneous flash mob which appears and then disperses?

Just admit that you had either screwed up, or were instructed by your PAP masters to sabotage the protesters.

No wonder people want to smash the skulls of NParks officers. Because you're asking for it. :rolleyes:
 

HTOLAS

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

Whatever the case might have been, how long does the police need to ask and have answered:
  • 'Are you aware that the permit to hold the event was revoked?'
  • 'How was the revocation conveyed to you?'

Apparently, our Keystone Kops took between 2 and 8 hours.
 

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

Now vile pappies resorting to 'backdating'?
This type of scams only run by dishonest insurance agents, car salesmen etc.....
Vile pappies bankrupt of ideas to fix dissidents?

The FAP Traitors are assuming that their 60% support base is intact regardless of their treacherous and despicable ways.
 

kingrant

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

The YMCA thing was purposely engineered to be there to create an incident. The organisers knew in advance that there was a planned protest there, and yet they went there.

The only thing being heckled was Teo Ser Luck. The protesters are deemed as having upset these mini-gods by raining on their parade. which is why they are being punished.

There is really no reason why the YMCA thing has to be organised at the Speaker's corner and not anywhere else. It is such an odd place for them. Here we had a PAP mini-god as VIP, so at least a dozen places that are far away for them must be easily available. But why did they choose to come to HLP? Why?

Defintely the YMCA event has been manipulated by the PAP for its gutter politics (again).
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

anyone heard of canceling a event right on the day?if concert management companies cancel concerts at the very last minute they stand to lose millions.there might even be a riot or mass arson and burning of vehicles and shops.
 

znxwrmc

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

typical handling of opposition by cronies of the pap
 

methink

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

This really is the proof that the whole "revoke" game is just a game. Sinkies are assumed to be idiots.

Wah piang eh... can suka-suka play game with sinkies huh? What they take us for? Idiots?

Can sue the authorities?
 

Poomer

Alfrescian
Loyal
Re: Shameless FAP Spin: NPARKS 'REVOKED' THE PERMIT OF CPF PROTESTORS ON THE MORNING

Now that I think about it, i do see the similar comparisons between Chee and Roy, only difference is Roy has declared his political neutrality. That said, both challenge the PAP in a combative way.

Who do you prefer, the Chees or Roy-HHH?
 
Top