Wooden in 1997 NDP Rally: SG Needed More Graduates!

[h=1]SDP: THIS IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE DO CUT-AND-PASTE POLICY-MAKING[/h]
<!-- /.block --> <style>.node-article .field-name-link-line-above-tags{float: right;}.node-article .field-name-ad-box-in-article {float: left;margin: 15px 15px 10px 0;}.node-article .field-tags{clear: both;}</style> Post date:
11 Oct 2014 - 3:14pm





<iframe src="http://tpc.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-0/html/container.html" style="display: none; visibility: hidden;"></iframe><ins id="aswift_0_expand" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-table; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><ins id="aswift_0_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><iframe name="aswift_0" width="336" height="280" id="aswift_0" frameBorder="0" marginWidth="0" marginHeight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowfullscreen="true" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></ins></ins>


In his 1997 National Day Rally, then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong pointed out that Singapore needed more undergraduate students. He said: “In fact, we are short of students who can meet the entry grade of NUS and NTU.”

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong now persuades Singaporeans not to “go on a paper chase for qualifications or degrees.”

It is this kind of confused approach to education that does so much damage to the country. Through the decades the PAP has used education as a tool to achieve its economic and, most unfortunately, political goals.

A snip here and some glue there has been the guiding principle of education policy formulation with the end-result that we now have to import foreigners in massive numbers without which, in Mr Lee Kuan Yew's words, Singapore will fail.

Fortunately, Singaporeans have become more discerning (and bolder) and are pointing out the shortcomings, and even hypocrisy, of the Government when it comes to educating our children.

For example, Ministers run the line that all our schools are equally good. This earned the rebuke of Jurong West Secondary School Vice-Principle Pushparani Nadarajah who said: “How many of our leaders and top officers who say that every school is a good school put their children in ordinary schools near their home? (Only) until they actually do so are parents going to buy (it).”

The truth is that the PAP does not know how to take our education to the next level because it does not have a clear grasp of what education is and what an educated person looks like. Its cyclical pattern of making patchy revisions to our education system will lead us nowhere.

The SDP believes that education must be the process where an individual learns to discover herself and, in doing so, endeavour to improve the human condition. To this end, it is important that we teach our children that reading and learning can be enjoyable and intrinsically rewarding. The goal should be to lead our students to learn, not push them to study.

Based on these principles, we have drawn up, among others, the following alternative measures:

1. Scrap PSLE. The exam places an extraordinarily unhealthy degree of stress on children. One in three students say they sometimes think that life is not worth living because of the fear of exams. (Read the shocking statistics in Why do we do this to our children?) In addition, capability is not measured by one examination at the age of 12. Scrapping the PSLE will allow teachers to teach and students to learn in a holistic manner.

2. Stop ranking students. Segregating students according to exam results is counter-productive. Education is not about competition with one’s classmates but learning through collaboration and teamwork with one’s peers.




<ins id="aswift_1_expand" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: inline-table; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><ins id="aswift_1_anchor" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: currentColor; width: 336px; height: 280px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: relative; background-color: transparent; border-image: none;"><iframe name="aswift_1" width="336" height="280" id="aswift_1" frameBorder="0" marginWidth="0" marginHeight="0" scrolling="no" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowfullscreen="true" style="left: 0px; top: 0px; position: absolute;" allowTransparency="true"></iframe></ins></ins>


3. Reduce workload, broaden curriculum. Broadening the curriculum to include student-collaboration projects, speech and drama, music and humanities, and reducing the workload on core subjects will prepare them to be well-rounded and intelligent individuals, instead of merely efficient exam-takers.

4. Reduce class size. Reducing class to 1 teacher to 20 students will enable teachers to pay more personal attention to the development of the students.

5. Cultivate creative minds. Training our teachers to build confidence in students instead of drilling into them the right answers will enhance the development of creative skills in our children.

Instituting these reforms will help us cultivate not just a talented workforce but also, and more importantly, a thinking and caring people.
Our education policy paper Educating for Equality and Creativity can be read here.

Singapore Democrats
Soruce: YourSDP.Org

That speech was made more than a decade and a half ago. Nothing is constant in this world and the PAP government is nimble enough to change emphasis when necessary.

Many nations have perished by sticking to an obsolete formula that no longer works. With the PAP in charge, you don't have to worry about that happening. They can foresee the future and will change course well ahead of time while other countries are swamped by situations they did not foresee.

That is why I respect the PAP leadership so much.

Leongsam said:

That speech was made more than a decade and a half ago. Nothing is constant in this world and the PAP government is nimble enough to change emphasis when necessary.

Many nations have perished by sticking to an obsolete formula that no longer works. With the PAP in charge, you don't have to worry about that happening. They can foresee the future and will change course well ahead of time while other countries are swamped by situations they did not foresee.

That is why I respect the PAP leadership so much.

Click to expand...

All these shit will not happen if they are more proactive. Foresee the future my foot. They are fucking shortsighted. :oIo:

Cho Simi Lan?

What's your beef ? It was 1997. Now they say no degree. Maybe, next year they change their mind and say degree is urgently needed. Why not ? The problem is your simple mind, which take them seriously. See ?

Many FT still get free scholarship fm Pappies yrly in NUS n NTU, why?

.....Fortunately, Singaporeans have become more discerning (and bolder) and are pointing out the shortcomings, and even hypocrisy, of the Government when it comes to educating our children.

Click to expand...

Educating our children is one thing, but making the parents pay for the costs of educating the children is another thing when secondary school students from foreign countries like India are invited to apply for free scholarship to study in schools in sinkie land.

Why do sinkies have to pay for educating foreign students? The paps will use public funds to educate these foreign students. The Indian Govt should be responsible for educating their Indian students but the paps are doing it for the Indian Govt.

shittypore said:

Many FT still get free scholarship fm Pappies yrly in NUS n NTU, why?

Click to expand...

For every scholarship given to a foreign student, the paps will deny a local student a place to study in that university built with tax payers' money. Are the paps looking after the welfare of local sinkies or running sinkie land as a charity house?

Leongsam said:

.....That is why I respect the PAP leadership so much....

Click to expand...

Hey uncle, if you respect pap so much, join the pap grassroot, lah, become a por lam par and pray to be spotted for a MP post.

Your glorification of the paps getting more ridiculous each passing day.

Correct what, that is why they imported so many FTrashes graduates, be it fake or genuine, end of the day, still CHEAPER for employers, no NS men liabilitues, employers no need to headache. Sinkies no need to study so much, all controlled by FTs can liao. Sinkies are born to be FUCK

When HR is headed by FT, it speaks volume.

Leongsam said:

That speech was made more than a decade and a half ago. Nothing is constant in this world and the PAP government is nimble enough to change emphasis when necessary.

Many nations have perished by sticking to an obsolete formula that no longer works. With the PAP in charge, you don't have to worry about that happening. They can foresee the future and will change course well ahead of time while other countries are swamped by situations they did not foresee.

That is why I respect the PAP leadership so much.

Click to expand...

Sorry but the PAP in charge is still sticking to the obsolete formula of CHEAP LABOUR strategy of the 60's era.

PAP forseeing the future; ROTFLOL!!!
The stop at 2 policy was the first of the many cockups to follow. How can a govt who REFUSES to admit their follies and mistakes expect any form of respect?

Their MANPOWER PLANNING is one SUPER DUPER COCKUP! Everything done by the PAP is simply knee jerk reactions. We see a lot of U TURNS or rethinks!