• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

"Control Freaks" has spoken

MirrorMan

Alfrescian
Loyal

There are limits to the exceptions you can enjoy, Hong Kong warned

People's Daily commentary scolds Hongkongers for thinking they deserve more special treatment


PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 07 October, 2014, 4:02am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 07 October, 2014, 4:56am

Adrian Wan in Beijing [email protected]

3ade6320d6dec88658ce9bb3726d094f.jpg


State television continues to run reports on Occupy Central on its evening news, including interviews with local opponent Robert Chow Yung (pictured).

There were limits to the exceptions granted to Hong Kong by the central government, the latest Beijing commentary on the Occupy sit-ins said.

It also said that Hong Kong people "should realise that only dialogue and reconciliation can solve problems, not extreme resistance".

The piece, posted on the website of the Communist Party's official newspaper, said the benign treatment granted Hong Kong, such as the "one country, two systems" formula and the ability to govern itself, had led some in the city to think they were the exception to the rest of the nation.

"Occupy Central is the extreme embodiment of the ethos of 'Hong Kong exceptionalism'," and it had crossed a line, said the commentary. The writer is identified as Guoping.

The central government had taken a pragmatic approach in giving Hong Kong some "exceptional" policies, demonstrating Beijing's rationality, generosity and tolerance, it said, adding: "Some people should not keep asking for more; they should know where the line of exceptions is."

It also reasserted the supreme authority of the decision made by the National People's Congress Standing Committee on electoral reform, saying it must be "thoroughly executed and not be affected by external pressure like Occupy Central".

The commentary is the ninth on the Occupy sit-ins penned by Guoping.

The pen name was likely aimed at a different group of readers to typical state media editorials, said Hong Kong-based political commentator Johnny Lau Yui-siu.

"Guoping can mean 'national peace' or 'state's view'. The mainland media has a propensity to play on double entendres like this," he said.

On September 30 - two days into the protests - a Guoping commentary called for rational dialogue.

It said Beijing respected the differences between Hongkongers and mainlanders and understood Hongkongers' frustration.

"The tolerance, patience and sincerity the central authority has for Hong Kong has never waned. A rational dialogue could be had as long as the deluded few recognise the truth," it read.

In subsequent days, the writer defended the Hong Kong police force's handling of peaceful demonstrators, which included using tear gas and pepper spray.

State media released two other Guoping commentaries late on Sunday. One of them focused on how street politics was doomed to fail, while chastising protesters who confronted police for disturbing the social order.

In another comment, posted on China.com.cn the writer slammed protesters for using "populism" to mobilise young people. The news portal is affiliated with the State Council Information Office.

Lau said such essays did not achieve much. "On the mainland, people have come to doubt what the state media says, or even assume the opposite of what is said is happening. In Hong Kong, given the far-fetched content, people don't take them very seriously," he said.

State television continues to run reports on Occupy Central on its evening news, including interviews with local opponent Robert Chow Yung.


 

krafty

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
many hongkies went overseas for a break during the protest last week, many do not wish to see protest actually. no eyes to see...
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
People's Daily is the mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, not unlike the Straits Times being the mouthpiece of the PAP.

Therefore, understand which perspective they're coming from, and take their opinion/editorial articles with a pinch of salt. :wink:
 

tonychat

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
i just cannot understand how those 3rd world communist chinks understand what is true democracy.

All the while during British rule, there is no problem, only prosperity and happiness.. Once those shit ass chinks take over, problems after problems occurred..

The Chinks should learn from hong kong how to grow a country with people having rights, not he other way round. fucktard chinks.

how a 3rd world chinks understand a first world human being thinking.


just like how a sinkie ball-licking shit understand a behaviour of a real human being.
 

Sinkie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Protest only if you want to form a new govt and be independent. Call it a rebellion.

The Marcos overthrow using People's Power lead to what? The country is still a piece of shit.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
this shows a government is afraid,any government that has to resort to dialogue and reconciliation means it has lost its balls and cajones....they know they have lost grip completely and any use of violence will lead to drastic consequences even more drastic than 1989 tiananmen square....it could lead to egyptian revolutions,it could lead to massive uprising and the exile of chinese president.

daft and stupid sinkies should take the cue and rise up against the PAP.
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Rebellion is a magnificent word.

Westminster form of democracy would not have emerged had Oliver Cromwell and his fellow Parliamentarians not rebelled. They even chopped off the head of Charles the First.

The Americans would not have emerged as a free nation (and superpower) had they not held a "tea party" in Boston and rebelled against their British overlords.

Frenchies and continental Europeans in general would not have their freedoms and rule of law had it not been for the French revolution which is in fact a rebellion - a VERY bloody one. Louis the Fatty lost his head to the guillotine.

CCP and Kuomintang were basically rebels against the ruling Qing dynasty.

By the way, Napoleon Born Apart was an FT, he was Corsican (i.e. Italian) and without him the French Revolution would have failed though some are of the view that he hijacked the revolution to declare himself Emperor. At least he gave the French and continental Europeans their Civil Law Code otherwise known as the Napoleonic Code. What did Old Fart do other than know how to use a knuckle duster in a cul-de-sac?
 
Last edited:

LEGEND

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
maybe number not as great as the protestors lah...but i fetch a a number of hongkies last weekend.

You and your rubbish. Now long holiday over there. Time of the year to have more Hongkies and Chinese going overseas for holiday.
 
Top