• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Singapore's population now 5.47 million, slowest growth in 10 years

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Wah SGP population plunge!!

SPH presstitute Tham Yuen-C followed up today with this piece:

http://business.asiaone.com/news/fewer-foreigners-hired-here



Fewer foreigners hired here



Friday, Sep 26, 2014
Tham Yuen-c
My Paper
SINGAPORE'S population grew at its slowest pace in 10 years for the 12 months ending this June, as fewer foreign workers were hired.

It crept up 1.3 per cent to 5.47 million people, including permanent residents and foreigners working here, according to figures released yesterday by the National Population and Talent Division (NPTD). In the previous year, the rise was 1.6 per cent.

The trend brings population growth numbers in line with projections in the White Paper on population, published in January last year, and is likely to continue, said Kang Soon-Hock of SIM University, who does research on demography.

If maintained, Singapore's population will cross the six-million mark in 2022.

"This means it would have taken 12 years to add one million people, compared to the 10 years it took previously," said CIMB economist Song Seng Wun.

Experts attribute the dip to government policies aimed at reducing the inflow of foreigners.

The NPTD noted that the Government had taken "concrete steps...to slow the growth of our foreign workforce to a more sustainable pace".

But Chua Hak Bin, Bank of America Merrill Lynch economist, warned that the slowdown, coupled with Singapore's low birth rate and rising number of elderly people, could have an impact on the economy.

"The effects of the ageing population would be felt more keenly with the tightening of immigration policies leading to fewer younger people being allowed here on work passes," he said.

NPTD said growth in the non-resident population, made up mostly of foreign workers, had let up. It fell to 2.9 per cent this year, compared to 4 per cent last year, mainly because fewer foreigners were hired by companies here in the services sector.

In the same period, foreign employment growth dipped to 3 per cent, compared to 5.9 per cent last year.

Meanwhile, Singapore's citizen population grew at the same pace as last year by 0.9 per cent, to 3.34 million.

And with increasing life expectancy and low fertility rates, the citizen population has continued to age, said the NPTD.

Singapore residents, across all ethnicities, are also having fewer babies. The total fertility rate was 1.19 last year, compared to 1.29 recorded the year before - during the Dragon Year. The replacement rate is 2.1.

Tan Ern Ser, National University of Singapore sociologist, said if Singaporeans want to maintain the current standard of living, the country would need people to take up jobs for which there are insufficient workers to sustain "some minimal level of economic growth", he said.

"There are trade-offs and we have to make difficult choices. We can't always have our cake and eat it, sadly," he added.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Wah SGP population plunge!!

How do we know that the 5.47 million number is accurate:confused:

I bet they are under declaring the numbers. Just like they are fudging with the PSI index(air quality).
 
Last edited:

Cerebral

Alfrescian (InfP) [Comp]
Generous Asset
PAP favourite 2 excuses for the liberal immigration policy
1) aging population
2) Fewer babies

However, they have failed to correlate the immigration growth to aging population issue. Back in the 90s, our population stands at around 3.3m with declining birthrate. Total workforce would be around 1m or so. if replacement were the key consideration, how did our population burgeoned to 5.5m? The numbers does not add up! The real underlying reason may be more terrifying to which i have no idea.
 

Cestbon

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Waoh dometic worker/maid is about 210k this group is the largest employment and is even bigger that active NS.
 

iluvgst

Alfrescian
Loyal
PAP favourite 2 excuses for the liberal immigration policy
1) aging population
2) Fewer babies

However, they have failed to correlate the immigration growth to aging population issue. Back in the 90s, our population stands at around 3.3m with declining birthrate. Total workforce would be around 1m or so. if replacement were the key consideration, how did our population burgeoned to 5.5m? The numbers does not add up! The real underlying reason may be more terrifying to which i have no idea.

the underlying reason is profit. In a population ponzi scheme the profits are privatised by business cronies and GLCs whilst the cost is borne by the people.
 

krafty

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
did any of you realise your own sperm count also become lesser with all the stress this pap country has caused us...?:o
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
PAP favourite 2 excuses for the liberal immigration policy
1) aging population
2) Fewer babies

However, they have failed to correlate the immigration growth to aging population issue. Back in the 90s, our population stands at around 3.3m with declining birthrate. Total workforce would be around 1m or so. if replacement were the key consideration, how did our population burgeoned to 5.5m? The numbers does not add up! The real underlying reason may be more terrifying to which i have no idea.

That's because Integration and Naturalisation Champions like him are busy welcoming all the extra FTs coming in. :wink:


yang%20yin.PNG
 
Top