-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
PAP will lose many Seats in 2015/16 General Elections ........ Is this Possible?
- Thread starter Force 136
- Start date
Morons who keep harping on 'credible' opposition candidates are dumbest of the dumbfucks.
What is the definition of 'credible'?
Same as that goondu term 'minister calibre' coined by old fart?
Pray tell which vile pappy minitoot now got such calibre?
How credible are the pap candidates then?
When assessing the political situation in sinkie land, one has to look at the assessment critically to get a good analysis.
Election is fair. True. This is the pride of LKY which is well known to the world. It is part of the respect that he earned from the world leaders.
Look at it again and you find the GRC system is a part of this electioneering process. Why the GRC? What is the real purpose of the GRC? In the free world, there is no such thing like the GRC.
To ensure the minority race gets a chance to enter Parliament in sinkie land? In Malaysia, the oppo parties put up Chinese candidates, a minority race, in Melayu areas, they were still elected by the Melayu voters in one-to-one contest. Why not the same kind of one-to-one contest in sinkie land?
In the past in the 1960s, Melayu papee candidates were elected by the Chinese too. They did not vote for the Chinese oppo parties' candidates.
Would the papees dismantle the GRC? They had already scaled down the number in each GRC team. Let the papees suffer the loss of three or more GRC in GE2016 and the death knell of the GRC system will be sounded after GE2016.
I sense that the ruling party is losing ground and sentiments are growing against them. The opposition parties are in for better times.
Cheers!
Cheers!
Before the pro-pappy dumbfucks harp on the quality of opposition, look first at the quality of the folks in the PAP camp: Michael Palmer, Intan, Wong Kan Seng, Lui Tuck Yew... I can go on and on but you get the idea.
Don't throw stones when you live in a glass house.
Looking at the GE11 results of various parties, SDP only get an average of 35%, NSP fared abit better whereas better organised WP got around 47%. It only goes to show angers on the ground can only bring u to a certain level in the sub 40% region hardly enough to threaten PAP. To hit past 50% mark would still very much depend on how good you are rather than how sore the ground sentiment is.
Judging by the ground sentiment, I don't think it going to be worse than GE11 but the state of various non WP opposition is rather worrying. WP will continue to perform well but have more reservation for the rest.
U never watch MU v QPR and MU v Leicester??? To beat MU, u got to be like Leicester. If u r like QPR or worst, u can never win!!
Let's say PAP gets voted out and WP gets to form the new government. What is going to change? WP ministers will still pay themselves millions. Monopolies and oligopolies change hand to pro WP instead of pro PAP business cronies. Dont forget business profits are highly dependent on cheap labor and high population growth. The WP cronies will be clamoring for the same old policies as PAP ones. It will be fascist and crony capitalism all over again. How will the common folk benefit?
Vote for opposition and things MAY improve.
Vote for PAP and things WILL DEFINITELY get worse.
It's all about the probability of outcomes. Risk-benefit analysis.
Will you take a calculated, educated risk, or slurp up the same old bullshit that has been force fed to you for decades (no credible/viable opposition, Singapore too small so no choice, the PAP is the only way, like it or not).
What do you think ?
With over 20,000 new citizenships given freely away each year !! You do the maths !!
I do the math you do the squats. Settle?
Even with no PAP, losers remain losers. There will be no difference in your life. It could only get worse. Spend your energy in giving a better life for you and your family. Don't waste time blaming Gahment.
Last edited by a moderator:
Just vote the opposition until the pap becomes the opposition.
Or make the PAP split, disbanded, outlawed, its members persecuted.
I would love to see them receive a little of the Operation Coldstore karma payback.
Simple, if they become as corrupted & self serving as as the current PAP, then vote out after 5 years. LKY was permitted to corrupt the system because he was in there for too long. What Spore needs are term limits e.g. in the US the President can only serve 2 terms.
entirely possible due to playing out sgians n continue to do so.......... the Ah Nehs are coming in unabated even Shanmugam got to take cover in USA
Surveys don't reflect election results
Similar threads
