Does this make economic sense? HDB's new mechanized parking multi level garages.

tanwahtiu said:

The mechanical product from China and the cost is cheap. One from Germany is expensive, Chinese copy is cheaper. Don't need brainer from the West to tell you expensive means is the best.

If you are interested to look into it, ask the PAP for the feasible study done and published in the LTA website for scrutiny and assessment. Don't let PAP paper generals screwed your life again.

How PAP has in place done the study of traffic management during peak hour? Don't let them tell you it is top secret again. Transparency is required to disclose their assessment to spend your CPF money $5M. Ask PAP for assessment compare concrete car park to mechanical car park system? PAP are developer, main contractor and cheap construction worker suppliers all in One, it is not a secret.

Cheap kekling kia labours build concrete car park is cheaper and maintenance free. Ozzies Angmoh Road Transport can tell you that.

1, Who is the manufacturer? Is the manufacturer reliable?
2, What is the noise level generated by the equipment?
3, Is this hydraulic or all mechanical equipment?
4. What speed is the equipment from 0 up 15 and 15 down 0 level?
5. Where is the feasible study of traffic management during peak hour?

More importantly, take their study and compare to other countries who has done the same. Many West town councils have thrown out the mechanical parking system. This mechanical system is good for private projects small size car park OK.

Gone are the days voters let PAP jiak leow bee paper generals turn Ministers do what they like. These coat tail back door entry MPs into parliament are NOT voters choices and letting incompetents slip in to plan your country is outdated.

Click to expand...

tanwahtiu said:

The mechanical product from China and the cost is cheap. One from Germany is expensive, Chinese copy is cheaper. Don't need brainer from the West to tell you expensive means is the best.

If you are interested to look into it, ask the PAP for the feasible study done and published in the LTA website for scrutiny and assessment. Don't let PAP paper generals screwed your life again.

How PAP has in place done the study of traffic management during peak hour? Don't let them tell you it is top secret again. Transparency is required to disclose their assessment to spend your CPF money $5M. Ask PAP for assessment compare concrete car park to mechanical car park system? PAP are developer, main contractor and cheap construction worker suppliers all in One, it is not a secret.

Cheap kekling kia labours build concrete car park is cheaper and maintenance free. Ozzies Angmoh Road Transport can tell you that.

1, Who is the manufacturer? Is the manufacturer reliable?
2, What is the noise level generated by the equipment?
3, Is this hydraulic or all mechanical equipment?
4. What speed is the equipment from 0 up 15 and 15 down 0 level?
5. Where is the feasible study of traffic management during peak hour?

More importantly, take their study and compare to other countries who has done the same. Many West town councils have thrown out the mechanical parking system. This mechanical system is good for private projects small size car park OK.

Gone are the days voters let PAP jiak leow bee paper generals turn Ministers do what they like. These coat tail back door entry MPs into parliament are NOT voters choices and letting incompetents slip in to plan your country is outdated.

Click to expand...

greenies said:

Ha ha your logic reminds me of younger day.
We joked about our school marks of... studying for 3 hours, got 60 marks; then we should study for 6 hours, we could hit 120 marks.

Click to expand...

rushifa666 said:

For you study is waste of time and money

Click to expand...

greenies said:

Was it the joke about direct proportional and scale?
3 hours study got 60 marks.
Thus, if studied for 6 hours, we could get 120 marks???

Click to expand...