• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

PAP FT pet whacks good samaritan Sinkie, and gets away with it

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Sounds like a PRC asshole FT imported by the PAP and given a freebie PR. Asshole PR in his forties with family here, and still never convert to shitizenship, tells me he is planning to run road back to China when he leeches enough money from singapore's economy and also when his son is ns eligible.

A misplaced camera, a misunderstanding, an accusation. These ingredients made for blood and tears for a family at Sentosa on Sunday. Blood, because the father was punched by another visitor after being accused of theft. Tears, because his young children and those of his assailant wailed as they watched their fathers hitting at each other. The victim, who wanted to be known only as James, 37, said he had gone to the Trickeye Museum at Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) with his wife, two children and in-laws.

The Trickeye Museum showcases around 80 optical illusions in the form of paintings and installations, allowing visitors to take creative photographs of themselves with the exhibits. After about 40 minutes, James' wife came across a small camera inside a Nikon case lying on a raised platform at an exhibit featuring a panda. The couple, who are both in the education sector, told The New Paper at their flat on Monday that their first thought was to hand the camera to the museum staff. James' wife, who wanted to be known only as Sarah, 32, said: "I asked a woman next to me if it belonged to her, but it did not." James said: "Right away, she wanted to return the camera. But the lost-and-found counter was outside. So we decided to do it at the end of our visit."

Sarah said she placed the camera into a baby stroller before handing it to her mother a few minutes later to put into her handbag for safe keeping. About half an hour later, a woman who introduced herself as a museum staff member approached Sarah. The museum told TNP that the woman was its operations manager. Sarah said the woman asked her if her family had seen anything others might have misplaced. "I wasn't sure she was a staff member because she wasn't wearing any identification. But we gave the camera to her," she said. Sarah then verified with her that she was a staff of the museum. The operations manager handed the camera to a woman in her 70s who was standing a few metres away.

The woman loudly accused her family of stealing the camera, said Sarah. "She was shouting at the top of her voice. The staff member tried to intervene to get her to move away, but she continued shouting." James heard the commotion and went to his wife's assistance. He said: "(The woman) was very aggressive and confrontational. I feared for my wife, so I argued with her." Then a man, who later said he was the woman's son, suddenly appeared in front of James.


The next thing James knew, the well-built man had punched him on the left side of his chin. He said: "I didn't realise my mouth was bleeding. I became very angry." He scuffled with his assailant in front of a crowd of around 20 people, some of them children. James said his father-in-law, 65, also joined in to throw some punches at the man. The fight lasted about a minute before they were separated. Two passers-by, two museum employees and six RWS employees and security personnel stepped in to stop the fight, a statement from the museum said. The museum also said that the attack had occurred because of a misunderstanding: The attacker had thought wrongly that James had pushed his mother. (See report on next page.)

TNP understands the attacker is a Singaporean permanent resident in his 40s. When the police arrived, they established that it was a case of voluntarily causing hurt, said a spokesman. He added that James was advised on his legal recourse. No arrest was made.

A Singapore Civil Defence Force spokesman said that an ambulance was sent, but both parties declined to be taken to the hospital. James, who said he had bruises on his chin, cuts on his lower lip and pain in his lower jaw, later went to hospital on his own. He said: "My four-year-old son is so traumatised now. He keeps asking me if the police would catch the man who punched Daddy. "The whole situation was ridiculous, unreasonable and quite stupid. Instead of being appreciative, they were aggressive and accused us of stealing their camera. Even if they wanted to dispute it, why did he have to hit me?" Sarah said: "It was out of goodwill that we wanted to return the camera. Now I regret picking it up." The other family could not be contacted.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Moral of the story: never be a Good Samaritan.

P.S: Trickeye Museum? What the fuck have they done to Sentosa? Bastards. :(
 

songsongjurong

Alfrescian
Loyal
No guessing should the attacker a sinkie on PRC, be cuffed in family presence and locked overnight for investigation...not surprise.

Shameless and Ungrateful PRC family...be bad luck befall them. AMTB.
 

virus

Alfrescian
Loyal
somebody go beat up a police family member pls these ingrates refused to take action and it is only fair that they get their bargain of justice.
 

xingguy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Source: AsiaOne Singapore

Punch-up after mix-up at Trickeye Museum
Ng Jun Sen The New PaperSaturday, Aug 30, 2014

20140828_punch_np.jpg

James (bottom left) had cuts on his lower lip during the fight at the entrance of the Trickeye Museum.
(Top left) A picture taken by James of the family who owned the camera.


A misplaced camera, a misunderstanding, an accusation. These ingredients made for blood and tears for a family at Sentosa on Sunday.

Blood, because the father was punched by another visitor after being accused of theft.

Tears, because his young children and those of his assailant wailed as they watched their fathers hitting at each other.

The victim, who wanted to be known only as James, 37, said he had gone to the Trickeye Museum at Resorts World Sentosa (RWS) with his wife, two children and in-laws.

The Trickeye Museum showcases around 80 optical illusions in the form of paintings and installations, allowing visitors to take creative photographs of themselves with the exhibits.

After about 40 minutes, James' wife came across a small camera inside a Nikon case lying on a raised platform at an exhibit featuring a panda.

The couple, who are both in the education sector, told The New Paper at their flat on Monday that their first thought was to hand the camera to the museum staff.

James' wife, who wanted to be known only as Sarah, 32, said: "I asked a woman next to me if it belonged to her, but it did not."

James said: "Right away, she wanted to return the camera. But the lost-and-found counter was outside. So we decided to do it at the end of our visit."

Sarah said she placed the camera into a baby stroller before handing it to her mother a few minutes later to put into her handbag for safe keeping.

About half an hour later, a woman who introduced herself as a museum staff member approached Sarah. The museum told TNP that the woman was its operations manager.

Sarah said the woman asked her if her family had seen anything others might have misplaced.

"I wasn't sure she was a staff member because she wasn't wearing any identification. But we gave the camera to her," she said.

Sarah then verified with her that she was a staff of the museum. The operations manager handed the camera to a woman in her 70s who was standing a few metres away.

ACCUSE

The woman loudly accused her family of stealing the camera, said Sarah.

"She was shouting at the top of her voice. The staff member tried to intervene to get her to move away, but she continued shouting." James heard the commotion and went to his wife's assistance.

He said: "(The woman) was very aggressive and confrontational. I feared for my wife, so I argued with her."

Then a man, who later said he was the woman's son, suddenly appeared in front of James. The next thing James knew, the well-built man had punched him on the left side of his chin.

He said: "I didn't realise my mouth was bleeding. I became very angry."

He scuffled with his assailant in front of a crowd of around 20 people, some of them children.

James said his father-in-law, 65, also joined in to throw some punches at the man. The fight lasted about a minute before they were separated.

Two passers-by, two museum employees and six RWS employees and security personnel stepped in to stop the fight, a statement from the museum said.

The museum also said that the attack had occurred because of a misunderstanding: The attacker had thought wrongly that James had pushed his mother. (See report on next page.)

TNP understands the attacker is a Singaporean permanent resident in his 40s.

When the police arrived, they established that it was a case of voluntarily causing hurt, said a spokesman. He added that James was advised on his legal recourse. No arrest was made.

A Singapore Civil Defence Force spokesman said that an ambulance was sent, but both parties declined to be taken to the hospital.

James, who said he had bruises on his chin, cuts on his lower lip and pain in his lower jaw, later went to hospital on his own.

He said: "My four-year-old son is so traumatised now. He keeps asking me if the police would catch the man who punched Daddy.

"The whole situation was ridiculous, unreasonable and quite stupid. Instead of being appreciative, they were aggressive and accused us of stealing their camera. Even if they wanted to dispute it, why did he have to hit me?"

Sarah said: "It was out of goodwill that we wanted to return the camera. Now I regret picking it up."

The other family could not be contacted.

Museum: It was all a misunderstanding

A series of misunderstandings led to the confrontation between the two families, said the Trickeye Museum.

The New Paper understands that the camera had been left at an exhibit by the elderly woman's son, who then wandered off.

The family, consisting of the elderly woman, her son, his wife and their two young daughters, then made a missing item report to the museum's staff, saying that it was a theft.

The museum's operations manager, who declined to be named, told TNP: "They were upset because without a camera, they couldn't fully experience the museum, which was about optical illusions. They wanted to call the police."

She said she led the family to the staff office at the back of the museum and told them to stay there while they investigated.

But the elderly woman left the office to try to find the camera on her own, according to an e-mail sent by the museum to James to explain what had happened.

The manager clarified later to TNP: "I had tried several times to bring her back to the office. She kept wanting to look for the camera."

Later on, the manager checked that the family was not around before she approached James and Sarah, who had found the camera.

SAW COUPLE

She introduced herself to the couple at the exit of the museum.

She said: "I asked them if they had seen anything that might have been misplaced by others, and she (Sarah) said no at first.

"They then explained they had wanted to hand in the camera at the end (of their visit). I was very grateful to them, so I thanked them."

James said that they were not sure if the manager was a legitimate staff member as she did not have any identification.

"We reacted like how anyone would have when approached by a stranger," he added.

But he denied that his wife had said no to the manager. Instead, she handed over the camera when asked. After that, Sarah verified with her that she was a museum staff member.

Unknown to the manager, the elderly woman had left the staff office again and stumbled upon her retrieving the camera from Sarah.
That was when the confrontation between the two families started.

During the stand-off, TNP understands that the elderly woman's son thought James had pushed his mother.
But James had only argued with her and did not touch her.

Said the museum spokesman: "We hope that visitors conduct themselves in a courteous and respectful manner while visiting our museum.
"We are looking into how to better handle such cases in future...to prevent confusion and misunderstanding."
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
What to do? Spore is now a dangerous place. You can be run down by Ferraris, buses, bicycles,...driven by foreigners. Assaulted by irrate foreigners. Can even step on pooh:eek: Don't expect any help from the authorities because they practice maximum "restraint"

As a Sporean If you are hurt you are liable for $$$ at our world class hospitals.

I go to JB by because it's cheaper & no one has ever bothered me there:smile:
 

dr.wailing

Alfrescian
Loyal
Moral of the story: never be a Good Samaritan.

Totally agree, especially when Sinkieland is now overrun by Ah Tiongs, Ah Nehs and Pinoys.

In Ah Tiong land, never ever help an old person who appears to be in need. S/he may accuse you of trying to cheat/harm them.

There is a well-know landmark case in which a young Chinese guy was accused of shoving an old woman to the ground. CCTV cameras and eye-witnesses pointed out that the old lady fell off the bus herself. However the Chinese judge handling the case ruled in the old woman's favor and awarded her substantial damages.

P.S: Trickeye Museum?[/QUOTE]

Sentosa is now a haven for tricksters; that's why there's a market for trickeyes.
 
Last edited:

MrCucumber

Alfrescian
Loyal
No guessing should the attacker a sinkie on PRC, be cuffed in family presence and locked overnight for investigation...not surprise.

Shameless and Ungrateful PRC family...be bad luck befall them. AMTB.

No they will be summarily tried and executed. Happy???
 

mojito

Alfrescian
Loyal
How dare he hit our prized PRs?! What if their children decide not to take up citizenship after the money we spent all these years enticing them with goodies? That sinkie needs to be punished most harshly!
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
What to do? Spore is now a dangerous place. You can be run down by Ferraris, buses, bicycles,...driven by foreigners. Assaulted by irrate foreigners. Can even step on pooh:eek: Don't expect any help from the authorities because they practice maximum "restraint"

As a Sporean If you are hurt you are liable for $$$ at our world class hospitals.

I go to JB by because it's cheaper & no one has ever bothered me there:smile:

U left out get burnt by FTs during a riot.
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Bloody conniving press, kept referrng the attackers as "other family"...out to get sinkies for good....

I don't know why police never arrested the attacker. After all, there are witnesses to the PR guy coming over and throwing the first punch. U know its a FT when no charges are pressed. The PAP is afraid if this PR got a criminal record, he is not eligible for shitizenship.
 

khunking

Alfrescian
Loyal
blank.gif
News @ AsiaOne
River hero dies after rescuing drowning family
Netizens are outraged that the rescued family turned their backs on rescuer Deng Jinjie when he was drowning. -AsiaOne

Sun, Jul 15, 2012
AsiaOne

A young man lost his life after rescuing a family from drowning in a river.
Deng Jinjie, 27, has been hailed a local hero after he rescued a family from drowning in a river in the city of Loudi in Hunan province, China.
Initial eye-witness reports reported that a family of three was swimming in the Sunshui River when a child of about five years old appeared to have drifted downstream.
His parents, who seemed to have difficulty rescuing their son, called for help and that was when Deng, who was then taking his dogs for a walk, jumped in to save them. Two other men also joined in to help with the rescue effort.
But in an unfortunate turn of event, Deng, drowns after saving the family.
It is believed that he could have run out of strength after rescuing them and was swallowed by the rapid waters.
His body was retrieved one hour later on July 3, 2012.
According to some eye-witnesses, the family left the scene immediately after they were rescued and did not stay back to help Deng.
What got Chinese netizens even more riled up was when the mother of the boy said it was "none of their business" when locals asked why they were leaving.
The incident sparked outrage online with many netizens calling the family "heartless" and "inhumane". They even called for their names to be made known in public and a search to be conducted to find out their identities.
But a man and two women made a surprise appearance at Deng's funeral on July 10. They are believed to be the ones who got saved on the afternoon Deng died from drowning.
It seems there were not three, but four persons who were rescued by Deng, including the boy's aunty.
The three kowtowed to Deng's grieving parents and in front of Deng's portrait in his home, reported Sina news. They were also weeping and appeared seemingly repentant.
This is not the first time someone has drowned in Sunshui River. In April 7 this year, a teenager accidentally drowned while swimming with his four friends.
Sunshui River is apparently a popular swimming spot for locals in summer.
Deng was believed to be a well-liked man, who loved his dogs and worked as a construction worker.
[email protected]
Hero dies after rescuing drowning family
Click on thumbnail to view (Photos: Internet)

<tbody>
</tbody>


<tbody>
</tbody>

<tbody>
</tbody>
blank.gif
Copyright ©2011 Singapore Press Holdings Ltd. Co. Regn. No. 198402868E. All rights reserved.
Privacy Statement Conditions of Access Advertise

<tbody>
</tbody>
 

eErotica69

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Some of your guys here do not mind getting insulted and screwed by our resident Foreign Trash from Malaysia Tonychat.

So you shouldn't be upset if some FT hammer Singaporeans.
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I have to say it again-makes the 60% feels good to be beaten up in their own place by foreigners?
 
Top