• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

AGC and IRAS pls go check how much this con-hee guy has 'harvest' for himself so far

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
AGC and IRAS pls go check how much this con-hee guy has 'harvest' for himself so far... Runs a 'charity' some more: means zero GST, zero property taxes, zero church income taxes paid right? Yet creating entertainment storm that seems to make sands-entertainment blush, n still dare to announce: "... ...we have a culture in City Harvest Church, as in many companies, of keeping our income as confidential as possible."

How can I ask, if church is so secretive about its accounts/ pastors salaries than even MB-sands-casino CEO: can it possibly be honest/ transparent in the way it shares the gospel/ teaches it: by misrepresenting Bible verses to yield profit is it, selling hope like the 4D/TOTO counter downstairs it it???!!!

Singapore tax revenue is already in shortfall and GST increase seems scheduled for 2016 (see Pict below).
And the AGC had also better please grow up. The job of the AGC is protecting society against the evil and the corrupt, not the political establishment hor (see Pict below also)...

These bible exploiting businessmen have gone much too far "keeping our income as confidential as possible" cannot be acceptable for an organisation operating on a charity license. The con-job-harvest mafia shouldn't exploit loopholes to enjoy tax-free charity status at the expense of the common man... To stay in $9.3 million: sentosa cove(ocean view)/ $28k/mth Hollywood bungalow some more...

I am a $-poor person, and my feedback to gahmen is that GST (AND INFLATION) HURTS!!!
Here's how Kong Hee 'defrauded donors', according to City Harvest's ex-treasurer
Posted on 20 August 2014
20140815_chew_vs_kong_ST.jpg
PHOTO: NOOIMAGES, ST
Feng Zengkun
My Paper
20 August, 2014
You defrauded donors by hiding hundreds and thousands of dollars your wife took from the donations as her music royalties, bonuses and salaries.
This was one of many accusations that former City Harvest treasurer Chew Eng Han threw at church founder Kong Hee in court yesterday.
The two former associates have known each other for more than a decade.
Now, Chew is trying to show that Kong was a liar and more deeply involved than he let on about the alleged misuse of around $50 million of the church's money, and someone more interested in personal gain than City Harvest's interests.
While cross-examining Kong, who was taking the stand, Chew told the court about a church account which donors, including himself, had contributed to.
The account was set up in 2006 to support Kong and his wife Ho Yeow Sun when they went off the church's payroll to do mission work, and to pay for expenses in the church's Crossover Project, which uses Ms Ho's music to evangelise.
But the couple took out about $450,000 to $500,000 each year between 2007 and 2009 as Ms Ho's music artiste salary, bonuses and royalties.
A year after this led to a deficit of slightly more than $500,000 in 2009, Kong called a meeting of the donors. He told them how much more they could donate to make up for the shortfall.
"We were quite troubled that our giving was not enough to support your ministry, so we decided to give more," Chew, 54, told Kong.
"But there was never actually a deficit in 2009. The deficit came after you stripped out royalties and salaries and bonuses that went to Sun."
Chew claimed that Kong never revealed to donors that hundreds and thousands of dollars were going to pay his wife.
When he asked Kong why, the 49-year-old pastor seemed emotionally drained when he replied: "I didn't have the chance to check with my wife if she wants to reveal her salaries and royalties, and we have a culture in City Harvest Church, as in many companies, of keeping our income as confidential as possible."
Chew said flatly in return: "These are the givers that are closest to you, your greatest supporters...
"One of the reasons I left the church is that when I look at this, I realised that you deceived the people closest to you."
He added that this was just one of several "lies" by his former spiritual mentor.
Chew claimed that attendance figures for City Harvest services had been "falsified" and "grossly exaggerated". He pointed to BlackBerry messages by church members that suggested the actual attendance was around 12,000 a week, not 28,000 as Kong had claimed.
Kong denied this, saying that the 12,000 figure referred to the tally of cell-group church members and not the total attendance.
"Cell-group figures are usually about 60 per cent or even lesser of the church's final attendance, if you include walk-ins and visitors," said Kong.
But Chew hit back, saying incredulously: "Are you saying that every week about 40 per cent of the attendees are new walk-ins that are not related to the cell-group members?"
Chew summed up his cross-examination of Kong yesterday by pointing out 10 ways the senior pastor had apparently failed the church, adding: "You do not love the church, as in its people, and you are not that concerned about the church suffering losses."

http://news.asiaone.com/print/news/singapore/kong-defrauded-donors
Scheduled GST increase:
120302-+New+ways+to+raise+revenue+needed,+says+DPM+Tharman,+quote.JPG
02March2012: DPM Tharman: Government revenues need to be raised.
Singapore%27s+growth+expected+to+slow+in+next+decade.JPG
Full text: 08June2012: Singapore's growth expected to slow in next decade
GST+hike+%E2%80%98more+likely%E2%80%99+if+Govt+needs+to+raise+revenue+for+new+initiatives-TDY+%2822Aug2013%29.JPG
22August2013: GST hike ‘more likely’ if Govt needs to raise revenue for new initiatives

AGC as a useless PAP sock-puppet in 1997:
10390015_708862965841705_3579930549839911222_n.jpg
(Pict source)
 
Last edited:

bic_cherry

Alfrescian
Loyal
Charities should come under STRICTER transparency/reporting standards than SGX listed

Partly the fault of poor existing legislation and supervision also. Charities should come under STRICTER transparency/reporting standards than SGX listed companies...
cala said:
Source thread (sgfuck): City Harvest Church trail: Chew Eng Han calls Kong Hee a LIAR!
So it's not Con Hee's fault?
Mostly, BUT not fully... The fact that the sums involved could get so big and the problem so convoluted and worse: involving not just ANY ORDINARY charity but a religious one even is sign that the gahmen has been sleeping for some time.

SGX listed companies are strongly advised to declare the core appoint holders remuneration in tiers of $250k e.g. $4.25m p.a. for bank CEO of very large bank etc.

For charities regardless of IPC status or not (IPC charities have ADDED benefit of donations being tax exempt for donors (e.g. NKF, Comm Chest): but religious institutions are ORDINARY charities: only GST exempt, property and company income tax exempt): to the requirement for top salary earners (maybe in $100k tiers) need also be declared (religious institutions should also be MORE strictly governed since their premise is essentially moral (but in a very amorphous way).

In the full edition of my first post in this thread (duplicate copy), the criticism about the AGC and pictures of scheduled 2016 GST increase have since been censored here.

Gahmen must be more strict with $$$ management in religious charity institutions since whilst they may often perpetuate the greatest good, where the Bible/ Quran is intentionally misquoted: then they become the seed for the greatest EVIL: e.g. 9/11 and various other $$$ laundering perpetuated/related terrorism acts.

Legislation demanding transparency of religious leaders salaries and transparency of $ accounts is thus long overdue. Sadly it seems, companies listed on SGX are financially regulated BETTER than religious institutions (charities) in Singapore.
 
Top