SIA became the second Temasek company to show wanton insensitiveness over an incident by suggesting a profit motive or actually stating a profit motive. Kudos to many SIA customers who immediately responded and SIA had to withdraw their web posting.
The first was when SMRT broadcasted to their taxi fleet that there is an income opportunity when their very own rail services came to an end. The intent was not to provide immediate transport relief but to make money.
Common sense will tell you that no cabinet minister or a Temasek board member would have the intestinal fortitude to speak to the boss about his wife. So what does that leave the country when the Govt holding company reflects poor corporate culture.
Should we not demand that the PM immediately find a replacement for his bedroom partner. I am not suggesting a divorce but change the captain at Temasek. Doing both might actually help everyone.
The first was when SMRT broadcasted to their taxi fleet that there is an income opportunity when their very own rail services came to an end. The intent was not to provide immediate transport relief but to make money.
Common sense will tell you that no cabinet minister or a Temasek board member would have the intestinal fortitude to speak to the boss about his wife. So what does that leave the country when the Govt holding company reflects poor corporate culture.
Should we not demand that the PM immediately find a replacement for his bedroom partner. I am not suggesting a divorce but change the captain at Temasek. Doing both might actually help everyone.