• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Human Rights Group: FAP has pattern of using legal proceedings to silence critics!

makapaaa

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
[h=1]GLOBALPOST: SINGAPORE BLOGGER LOST EVERYTHING JUST BY CRITICIZING THE PRIME MINISTER[/h]Post date:
25 Jun 2014 - 1:57pm







JAKARTA, Indonesia — They’ve called it a David versus Goliath fight and, for once, the cliche is appropriate.



On one side, a 33-year-old public hospital employee; on the other, Singapore’s prime minister. Until last month, Roy Ngerng was just a normal guy blogging about social issues in Singapore.
He’s now being sued by the city-state’s prime minister, has been fired from his job, and has gained national fame.

It all started last month, when Ngerng published a blog post suggesting — according to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s lawyer — that the prime minister was "guilty of criminal misappropriation of the monies paid by Singaporeans” to the compulsory state pension fund.

Roy Ngerng was asked to take down the post (now available here), publicly apologize, and offer compensation. He complied with the requests. The apology even involved flowers. But the approximately $4,000 compensation he offered was deemed “derisory” and rejected by the prime minister’s aide.

He’s now being sued for defamation.

To Human Rights Watch Asia deputy director Phil Robertson, Roy Ngerng has clearly “hit a nerve.”

In a normal democracy, he says, the response would be to send someone from the pension fund administration to debate the allegations, instead of suing an “ordinary citizen.”

“Politicians in public life should have a higher level of tolerance for opposing views,” he says. “Roy Ngerng didn’t say the PM of Singapore is corrupt, he said there are questions to be answered.”

“Unfortunately Singapore is not a normal democratic country,” he adds. “There’s been a demonstrated pattern of using legal proceedings to silence critics.”


Local and international media have paid damages and issued apologies in the past, and online critics have been threatened with lawsuits. Last year, political cartoonist Leslie Chew, who created the Facebook page “Demon-cratic Singapore” (“a 100 percent fictional comic series about a country that doesn’t exist”) was arrested for “scandalizing the judiciary.” That’s a common law offense in Singapore, according to HRW. The cartoonist faced charges until he agreed to apologize.

Ngerng is the first online critic to actually be sued for defamation by a Singaporean leader.

According to Agence France-Presse, the typical minimum value of damage claims in Singapore High Court is about $200,000.

Singapore’s prime minister is believed to be the world’s best paid leader, earning about $1.76 million a year. Meanwhile, Ngerng makes around $3,000 a month — or he used to, before he was fired from his job two weeks ago. His employers said he had “misused company time and resources” and called his conduct “incompatible with the values and standards expected of employees.”

Ngerng, for his part, believes the decision was “politically motivated.”

The Ministry of Health issued a public statement supporting the dismissal, a move Phil Robertson calls “absolutely outrageous.”

“The case hasn’t even reached the court. Innocent until proven guilty should apply here,” he says.

If Prime Minister Lee hoped to quell critics by suing Ngerng, however, somewhat predictably it has had the opposite effect.

The author of “The Heart Truths” has received massive support on his blog and Facebook page, as well as financially. Crowd-funding his defense, he exceeded his target of 70,000 Singaporean dollars in four days. He’s also spoken at a protest against the pension system organized earlier this month, and written plenty more on the subject.

He says the support he receives shows the people of Singapore want a “voice” and more transparency on the issue.

Last week, the Prime Minister’s press secretary Chang Li Lin wrote to British weekly The Economist to criticize its coverage of the case. “You referred to an “alleged ‘serious libel’” by Roy Ngerng. This is not an allegation. Mr Ngerng has publicly admitted accusing Lee Hsien Loong, the prime minister, of criminal misappropriation of pension funds, falsely and completely without foundation,” he wrote.

When we contacted the Prime Minister’s office, the same Chang Li Lin told us he wouldn’t comment as the matter was before court.

The pre-trial is scheduled for July 4.

Source: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/140624/sing...
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Re: Human Rights Group: FAP has pattern of using legal proceedings to silence critics

More and more international interest and the case has not even gone to trial yet.


Mickey Spiegel another Human Rights Watch contributor has this to say

In Singapore, blogging dissatisfaction with government policies by insinuating corruption on the part of high officials is a surefire way to get hit with a defamation suit and to lose your job........

Ngerng’s employer, the Tan Tock Seng Hospital, soon after publicly fired him ........ Outrageously, the Ministry of Health then intervened to publicly support the hospital’s decision, even though the ministry was not involved in the matter. Neither the hospital nor the ministry is party to the defamation lawsuit......

In Singapore, free speech is apparently only free depending on who you are and who you are talking about. As Roy Ngerng is learning, even implying criticism of the government is risky in a country where government leaders are quick to bring a lawsuit in response to public comments that are pretty ordinary in rights-respecting democracies.

Lee’s current defamation suit though the first time he has sued a private citizen, is part of a long tradition that has proven useful to Singapore’s leaders for muzzling meddlesome foreign media, harassing opposition political figures and prompting self-censorship among the general populace that helps shut down possibly embarrassing revelations. If this defamation suit conforms to type, it will further demonstrate the government’s unwillingness to let citizens have their say.

http://www.hrw.org/news/2014/06/24/dispatches-perils-blogging-singapore

Has anyone found any report OUTSIDE Singapore that supports LHL's lawsuit?
 
Last edited:
Top