-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Lky
- Thread starter TracyTan866
- Start date
Lee Ky - 2013
Lee Ky - 2014
Lee Ky - 2015
????????
can we have a good pic of him in 1965, 1975 and one in 1985?
Thanks
Last edited:
ghostly and eerie....
Instantly......that evening ISD officers also brought along a lawyer to do the deep poll on the spot.
wow...he sounded petty
Where he got care whether it's lawful or not? The fucking bastard is after all the law.
no one dared to tell LKY that he was wrong?
i rather see him young, handsome,strong
i heard Devan Nair wrote a very unflattering account of LKY in his diary. Anyone here has that excerpt?
DEVAN NAIR c/o Miss K. Nair
12 Leigh Road London, N5.
8 July, 1988.
AN OPEN LETTER TO LEE KUAN YEW For The Editor The Straits Times Singapore.
Kuan Yew, I will come to the crux of my case against you straight away. What is it that you are afraid of, and that impelled you to such a massive public exercise in the total denigration of a comrade of nearly thirty years?
What prompted you to stoop so low to an utterly shameless demolition effort, by way of the incredibly sordid White Paper tabled before Parliament on 29 June?
Your statement in Parliament the same day gave you away. It made it abundantly clear that you were motivated by political revenge. For you referred to my recent public statements on political developments in Singapore as having made necessary what you did. But legitimate political comment calls for a rational political response, not for political revenge by way of a revolting descent into the gutter. The entire exercise reeks of revenge, a motive which enabled you to throw overboard all ethical considerations, medical ethics, Confucianist, Christian, Hindu ethics, the whole lot.
According to your own panel of doctors, I suffered from a medical condition, not a moral or political one. Clinical tests clearly indicated a much enlarged liver, resulting in a state of acute confusion, bouts of giddiness, exhaustion and fainting spells, admittedly erratic conduct, and amnesia. We may differ about the diagnosis. Several doctor friends of mine in Singapore, let alone in the United States, have quite other notions about the diagnosis. For now, we will let that be.
But where in the civilized world is sordid political capital so shamelessly squeezed out of a medical condition? Where else would self-respecting politicians count obviously transient behaviour, proceeding from a critical medical condition, as a fundamental moral or political lapse? And where else is the sacrosanct confidentiality of medical reports, and of doctor-patient relations, so outrageously violated for a purely political purpose? You know the answers. Only in a society governed by a man like you.
All my comrades in party, trade unions and government, including you, have always known me (you often extolled me), as a highly moral man over nearly three decades of intimate comradeship in a common struggle for a common cause-the building of a nation. How does a clearly transient condition transform me overnight into a hopeless alcoholic, womaniser, wife-beater, among other lurid depictions of depravity? The data presented in the White Paper, in the form of my letters to you just before and after my resignation, and of Dr. Nagulendran's psychiatric report! to you (the use of which constitutes the most disgusting outrage on medical ethics imaginable), can only be seen in undistorted perspective, in the light of the most crucial data of all which, of course, has been carefully omitted.
You know very well that all this was done or took place when I was under extraordinarily heavy sedation, 125 mgs (yes, one hundred and twenty-five mgs) of valium daily, to be precise, for some ten days.
Full story:
thank you very much. what i am referring to is one he wrote abt LKY persecuting JBJ
thanks....
... if the newly imported shitizens give him their votes as well in AMK GRC. If sinkies move away from him, he may not win.
if more singaporeans see through pap's evils, we can still knock out the pap decisively.
what i dont understand abt the pap is why does it have to be so scheming and resort to such things to try retain power.
Do you happen to know the late former chief abbot Reverend Seck Hong Choon of the famous Kong Meng San Buddhist Temple at Bright Hill Ave off Thomson Rd?
The old bastard used to visit the chief abbot to seek for guidance, favors and prayers.
In the 70's the political situation stabilized and when he didn't need the chief abbot's help, he let the chief abbot down big-time.
The chief abbot was so disappointed by the old bastard, he severed all ties with him in 1974!
Many of us who were closed to the Grand Master Rev Seck Hong Choon; as early as the 70's we were already told that this devious bastard would not hesitate to betray anybody for his personal gain.
