• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Hongkongers clash with mainland parents after toddler urinates in Mong Kok street

Jar Jar Binks

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset

Hongkongers clash with mainland parents after toddler urinates in Mong Kok street


Couple arrested on suspicion of theft and assault

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 22 April, 2014, 5:41pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 22 April, 2014, 6:58pm

Chris Luo [email protected]

24a.jpg


Hongkongers scuffled with the mainland couple after they allowed their toddler to relieve himself on a busy street in Mong Kok

A dispute between mainland Chinese tourists and locals over a toddler urinating in a Hong Kong street has once more become a flash point in already tense cross-border relations.

This time, the dispute ended in a scuffle that led to the arrest of a mainland couple, the parents of the toddler, and an online uproar in both Hong Kong and the mainland.

Several video clips that have been widely circulated online did not capture the scenes of the toddler urinating, but show the young couple, carrying their two-year old boy, locked in a fierce quarrel with two local Hong Kong young men, as one of whom took photos of the scene at Sai Yeung Choi Street South in Mong Kok.

During the scuffle the couple snatched the memory card from the young man’s camera and tried to leave the scene. The young men stopped them from leaving and called the police.

Surrounded by onlookers on the street, the woman desperately explained to the crowd that they had found a public toilet but saw there was a long queue, so had no other choice but to let their child to relieve himself on the street instead.

“The kid was going to pee in his pants, what do you want me do?” the mother asked the young men. Her enraged husband repeatedly asked the two men: “Do you have a kid? Do your children take pees?”

The two men held onto the pram to stop the couple from leaving, prompting the woman to hit one of the men on his arm. The video clips ended when a police officer arrived at the scene.

The husband and wife, both two-way permit holders, were subsequently arrested on suspicion of theft and assault respectively during the incident, a spokeswoman of Hong Kong Police Force told the South China Morning Post on Tuesday.

She added the woman was later released on bail and was due to report back to police in mid-May for a pending investigation, while her husband was released unconditionally.

The incident occurred last Tuesday but the video clips only drew public attention over the weekend, immediately going viral on mainland social media sites.

Numerous mainland media agencies reposted the news on their official accounts of China’s most popular social media platform Weibo, drawing tens of thousands of comments.

Online reactions were very much polarised. The majority of online users in mainland China say they found the parents’ behaviour understandable as they had tried to find a toilet for their child.

“How many toddlers can hold on long enough when they want to relieve themselves?” said a commentator, who asked critics to show more tolerance of the parents.

Some pointed to a photo of the child relieving himself at the scene, which appeared to show the mother using a paper nappy to catch the urine, rather than simply allowing the toddler to relieve himself on the ground.

Other online users took a step further and condemned critics of the parents for “taking the moral high ground,” adding that their expectation of tourists unfamiliar with the city to find a public toilet in a short space of time was over the top.

A number of others even questioned if the photographers could be accused of taking indecent pictures of a young child.

But still many blasted the parents for their lack of basic public decency.

“This is such a humiliating act of mainland tourists in Hong Kong,” one comment read. Several others posted photos of mainland parents letting their children relieve themselves in public from other occasions.

Others blamed the parents for not taking enough precautions when taking their toddler out onto the street, saying that being unable to find a toilet was not a legitimate excuse.

According to the Public Cleansing and Prevention of Nuisances Regulation: “No person having the care or custody of any child under 12 years of age shall permit, without reasonable cause, the child to obey the call of nature in any public street.” Subjects found violating the regulation could face a fine of at least HK$2,000.

But those defending the parents said that trying but being unable to locate a public bathroom could be considered a reasonable justification in this case.

The latest row underlines mounting tensions between Hongkongers and mainlanders which has given way to simmering anti-mainland sentiment in Hong Kong.

While some Hong Kong residents have labelled mainland tourists as having “uncivilised behaviour”, mainlanders have in turn accused Hongkongers of being “discriminating” and “patronising”.

In the past months the city has seen several anti-mainlander protests held in crowded shopping spots such as Mong Kok and Tsim Sha Tsui, both of which are often flocked to by mainland tourists and shoppers.

 
Last edited:

syed putra

Alfrescian
Loyal
when i was young, boys of chinese descent typically urinate in the drain and not the school toilets. So what else is new.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Well done Hongkies!

Akan datang, Sinkies to finally grow a pair and dispense street justice on unhygienic Tiongs who pee and poo in public?


prcshit.jpg



Screen%20Shot%202014-04-03%20at%2011.41.10%20am.png
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
how come hongkies are allowed to have mounting tensions with mainlanders but sinkies not allowed with pinoys and shytskins?
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
this couple like most ah tiongs should be put under the firing squad!

WHy u complain? U love PAP, well, your PAP loves tiongs and allows 1 million into SIngapore. You not song, change your moniker, idiot. More of this kind of behaviour coming to singapore, ok?

HONG KONG - Police had to be called in after a group of 29 tourists from Fujian, China, kicked up a huge and unnecessary fuss - lasting for seven hours - at a hotel in Hong Kong.According to a YouTube video uploaded by Apple Daily, the group had tried to book seven rooms, meant to accommodate 24, for one night before their arrival in the country.However, the transaction did not go through as the credit card they used had already expired. This meant that they did not have a reservation at all.Upon arriving at the hotel in Tsim Sha Tsui, the tourists started to air their grievances with staff.Despite the short notice, hotel staff agreed to offer four rooms to accommodate the large group at the price of HKD $8,000 (SGD $1,300).The set of rooms included:- One room with seven bunk beds could apparently fit 14 people- Two rooms that could hold six people each, though four people would have to sleep on the floor as there were only two double beds in each room- One room for the remaining three touristsThe group then checked in and went to Disneyland. However, they expressed their displeasure with the rooms upon returning at 7pm.These complaints include not liking bunk beds, not wanting to sleep on the ground under any circumstances, as well as not wanting men and women in the same room.This went on for seven hours till 2am, after the hotel agreed to pay for the group to stay at a neighbouring hotel. -
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
farking prc animals.even those with money in Australia are barely better than animals.filthy,smelly and bad hygiene even though they have thousand dollar watches.
 

wMulew

Alfrescian
Loyal
Those retards have no idea the only reason Hong Kong economy is still alive is because of mainlanders. China should ban Citizen travel to HK for 3 months. Hong Kong will be so screwed they will be begging them for tourist.
 

ILovePAP

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Those retards have no idea the only reason Hong Kong economy is still alive is because of mainlanders. China should ban Citizen travel to HK for 3 months. Hong Kong will be so screwed they will be begging them for tourist.
I would suggest too that China BAN its citizens travel to Sinkapore for 6 months. :biggrin:
 

youth123

Alfrescian
Loyal
Those retards have no idea the only reason Hong Kong economy is still alive is because of mainlanders. China should ban Citizen travel to HK for 3 months. Hong Kong will be so screwed they will be begging them for tourist.
I know the mainlanders bring in the revenue, but the mainlanders must do their part mah, cos their rude behaviour contradicts HKers way of life. That's why.
 

Tuayapeh

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
WHy u complain? U love PAP, well, your PAP loves tiongs and allows 1 million into SIngapore. You not song, change your moniker, idiot. More of this kind of behaviour coming to singapore, ok?

HONG KONG - Police had to be called in after a group of 29 tourists from Fujian, China, kicked up a huge and unnecessary fuss - lasting for seven hours - at a hotel in Hong Kong.According to a YouTube video uploaded by Apple Daily, the group had tried to book seven rooms, meant to accommodate 24, for one night before their arrival in the country.However, the transaction did not go through as the credit card they used had already expired. This meant that they did not have a reservation at all.Upon arriving at the hotel in Tsim Sha Tsui, the tourists started to air their grievances with staff.Despite the short notice, hotel staff agreed to offer four rooms to accommodate the large group at the price of HKD $8,000 (SGD $1,300).The set of rooms included:- One room with seven bunk beds could apparently fit 14 people- Two rooms that could hold six people each, though four people would have to sleep on the floor as there were only two double beds in each room- One room for the remaining three touristsThe group then checked in and went to Disneyland. However, they expressed their displeasure with the rooms upon returning at 7pm.These complaints include not liking bunk beds, not wanting to sleep on the ground under any circumstances, as well as not wanting men and women in the same room.This went on for seven hours till 2am, after the hotel agreed to pay for the group to stay at a neighbouring hotel. -



i dont understand why is this the hotel"s fucking problem....just tell them that they have no right to stick around the hotel and ask for them to be evicted, ...if they cause trouble call in the poodles....


then again the poodles in sinkieland might either be hiding in am,bulances or by the time you go look for them after 7 pm, their police posts all shut for the day....



these cheebyekiahs have some understanding with the crooks that the criminals will only commit crimes during office hours hor???


fuck you SPF for your useless scholars and their cheebye policies
 

BuiKia

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Yah and boys of Malay descent wash their dick with urine at the basin in full view of everyone. Guess what they are still doing it when they become adults.


when i was young, boys of chinese descent typically urinate in the drain and not the school toilets. So what else is new.
 
Top