If women don't want people to photo their under wears, they should wear decent clothing. they wear sexy, but get angry if people stare at them.
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Only Probation for Civil Servant Who Took Upskirt Photos. Elite?
- Thread starter makapaaa
- Start date
[h=1]http://www.todayonline.com/singapor...g-man-who-took-upskirt-videos?singlepage=true
Judge says role of impulse key in sentencing man who took upskirt videos[/h] <article class="node-463996 article node node-article node-promoted view-mode-highlight_article clearfix" about="/singapore/judge-says-role-impulse-key-sentencing-man-who-took-upskirt-videos" typeof="sioc:Item foafocument"><header></header>
</article>
<article class="node-463996 node node-article node-promoted view-mode-full inline clearfix" about="/singapore/judge-says-role-impulse-key-sentencing-man-who-took-upskirt-videos" typeof="sioc:Item foaf
By Neo Chai Chin -
Published: April 12, 4:16 AM
(Page 1 of 1) - PAGINATE
SINGAPORE — Are diagnosed voyeurs seized by their impulses when they plan to commit an offence? A High Court judge posed this question yesterday when he heard the Attorney-General’s Chambers’ appeal to increase the sentence of a voyeur who took multiple upskirt videos.
The offender, a 30-year-old former government ministry employee, was sentenced to probation with conditions for 17 charges pertaining to possession of obscene films and filming of upskirt and hidden-camera videos of women and children.
<!-- inline -->
Prosecutors, however, are pressing for jail time for the offender, a diagnosed voyeur and fetishist. He cannot be named so as to protect the identity of his victims.
Justice Chan Seng Onn said whether the offender was compelled by impulse when he installed a hidden camera at his girlfriend’s house would have “serious bearing on sentencing”. He adjourned the case so that psychiatric expert witnesses can be called to address the question.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Tang Shangjun argued that a custodial sentence is warranted, given the seriousness of the offences and how they were planned and premeditated.
The offender was caught taking an upskirt video of a woman at Giant Hypermarket in IMM Shopping Mall in January 2011.
More offences surfaced during investigations: He was found to possess more than 10,000 obscene videos and had also used a hidden camera between August 2010 and January 2011 to film his girlfriend’s family members — including two girls aged 10 and 12 — showering at home.
The offender knew the family would switch on the water heater before showering and would wait until they did so before going into the toilet to place the camera, which was disguised as a cigarette lighter, the court heard. He would retrieve it after they had showered.
He had also taken upskirt videos of his colleagues at the ministry.
Of the 17 counts he faced, six were proceeded on and the remainder taken into consideration for sentencing.
The outcome of this case has “significant implications on how well the privacy and modesty of women are protected in an era when miniaturised and hidden digital video recording devices are increasingly available”, said Mr Tang. He added that sentencing the offender to probation “tilts the balance too heavily in favour of (him)”.
Despite the offender’s mental condition, the rehabilitory aspects of the punishment should take a backseat to deterrence and retribution, the prosecutor said.
The offender, who was red-faced and looked down throughout the hearing, is receiving treatment at the Institute of Mental Health, his lawyer told the court.
The maximum penalty for taking an upskirt or hidden-camera video of women is jail for up to one year and a fine. NEO CHAI CHIN
</article>
sounds like a job for anon
Who reduced my points!!!!
[h=1]http://www.todayonline.com/singapor...g-man-who-took-upskirt-videos?singlepage=true
Judge says role of impulse key in sentencing man who took upskirt videos[/h] <article class="node-463996 article node node-article node-promoted view-mode-highlight_article clearfix" about="/singapore/judge-says-role-impulse-key-sentencing-man-who-took-upskirt-videos" typeof="sioc:Item foaf
</article>
<article class="node-463996 node node-article node-promoted view-mode-full inline clearfix" about="/singapore/judge-says-role-impulse-key-sentencing-man-who-took-upskirt-videos" typeof="sioc:Item foaf
By Neo Chai Chin -
Published: April 12, 4:16 AM
(Page 1 of 1) - PAGINATE
SINGAPORE — Are diagnosed voyeurs seized by their impulses when they plan to commit an offence? A High Court judge posed this question yesterday when he heard the Attorney-General’s Chambers’ appeal to increase the sentence of a voyeur who took multiple upskirt videos.
The offender, a 30-year-old former government ministry employee, was sentenced to probation with conditions for 17 charges pertaining to possession of obscene films and filming of upskirt and hidden-camera videos of women and children.
<!-- inline -->
Prosecutors, however, are pressing for jail time for the offender, a diagnosed voyeur and fetishist. He cannot be named so as to protect the identity of his victims.
Justice Chan Seng Onn said whether the offender was compelled by impulse when he installed a hidden camera at his girlfriend’s house would have “serious bearing on sentencing”. He adjourned the case so that psychiatric expert witnesses can be called to address the question.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Tang Shangjun argued that a custodial sentence is warranted, given the seriousness of the offences and how they were planned and premeditated.
The offender was caught taking an upskirt video of a woman at Giant Hypermarket in IMM Shopping Mall in January 2011.
More offences surfaced during investigations: He was found to possess more than 10,000 obscene videos and had also used a hidden camera between August 2010 and January 2011 to film his girlfriend’s family members — including two girls aged 10 and 12 — showering at home.
The offender knew the family would switch on the water heater before showering and would wait until they did so before going into the toilet to place the camera, which was disguised as a cigarette lighter, the court heard. He would retrieve it after they had showered.
He had also taken upskirt videos of his colleagues at the ministry.
Of the 17 counts he faced, six were proceeded on and the remainder taken into consideration for sentencing.
The outcome of this case has “significant implications on how well the privacy and modesty of women are protected in an era when miniaturised and hidden digital video recording devices are increasingly available”, said Mr Tang. He added that sentencing the offender to probation “tilts the balance too heavily in favour of (him)”.
Despite the offender’s mental condition, the rehabilitory aspects of the punishment should take a backseat to deterrence and retribution, the prosecutor said.
The offender, who was red-faced and looked down throughout the hearing, is receiving treatment at the Institute of Mental Health, his lawyer told the court.
The maximum penalty for taking an upskirt or hidden-camera video of women is jail for up to one year and a fine. NEO CHAI CHIN
</article>
I dont know whether anyone noticed wtf is going on here but the fucking presstitutes have completedly omitted to name the fucking pervert!!!
WTF is the name of this fucking White Horse!!!??
Where are those intrepid fellas from the HWZ CSI team!!!!!!??????
Name and Shame the bastard here already bros!!!!!!
Preempt! I will threaten the culprit pay me = to our minister pay or I will expose him in sam's forum.
Congratulations, you will become a grandparent very soon.
If don't want people to photo their underwear, don't wear under wear lor.
Thank you! preempt, better prepare to pay me = to our minister pay or you will be expose in sam's forum. 
dun worry, i will take good care of your daughter...muahaha...
Still don't understand why cannot be named. How the hell do the identity of his victims be known to the public by naming this paedophile?
Now Sinking land have one more paedophile on the loose.
I have different idea ...If women don't want people to photo their underwear then they should not wear underwear
Good for you, very soon free grassroots membership will be issued to you.
If I want I got it 40 years ago. I served Redhill Close MP, Brickwork Est. MP, Leng kee MP, 10 years ago I knew Opposition MP JB Jeya, Cheo, and befriended Chee, Ravi and many others. Now retired talk cock sing song, walk here walk there.
Oh he has a compulsion eh? Cut off his dick and we'll see if the " compulsion" disappears
95% hiding ID because connected to MIW, scholar or family member of elite.
One more possibility - from intel agency? So cannot disclose ID?
bro i would have gussed that if he is true blue intel, nobody would know anyway so i think your first guess about white horse is most likely....
anyway wtf kinda bullshit reasons is that about taking pictures of young girls whose identities must be protected and which nobody can track anyway ...simi lanjiao lor
he's working hard doing intel on underworld kang tao.
Not too long ago, a gentleman got into trouble at a clinic. He was a very high ranking SID officer but newspapers skipped that part.
Anyone recall that case?
Similar threads
