• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Its an Analogy... some idiots just takes it literally.. LOL

Isogallardo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Alex Tan failed english or he has selective reading? Chan Chun Seng states said it wasan ANALOGY. Analogies are not to be literally. dumbass.


1172777_647949345242373_897915851_o.jpg
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
u wanna eat @ hawker centres, fudcot or restaurants? ...

how many peasants even noe watz pizza? ... much less how 2 make it! ...

totally lost touch! ...
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
The issue is not Alex but the Minister.

He picked a poor analogy. And he is a cabinet minister. How to articulate the makeup and need for policies effectively if he can't even pick an appropriate analogy. People increasingly want to be more involved in the decision making process because the trust in the govt doing it right has diminished significantly. It does not help when the calibre of senior leaders are wanting. Remember the population White Paper.

Remember also the Brompton Case. Despite calls from social media and availability of pricing information on the web, Khaw ruled that it was done right. It took an internet CSI to show the relationship between Khaw's staff and the vendor, the suspicious timing of the tender etc to show how smelly it was.

If this Govt can't even tender for a bicycle properly and if this Govt can't even recognise that something is wrong from the rising crescendo of concerns expressed by numerous citizens, can we trust this govt to even make a pizza.
 
Last edited:

Scrooball (clone)

Alfrescian
Loyal
Alex Tan seems very rude and brash. Big worry if this oppo clown gets into politics.

Hopefully LTK can find more credible oppo members to join the cause.
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
The correct analogy he should be referring to is making the pizza not eating it. What an idiot.
 

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Using the pizza analogy of his:

We have an overpaid, incompetent pizza chef who serves shit pizzas.

Instead of finding out why the customers wouldn't take a bite, he mocks them for failing to appreciate 'good pizza' and suggests that they make the pizzas themselves.
 

Papsmearer

Alfrescian (InfP) - Comp
Generous Asset
Using the pizza analogy of his:

We have an overpaid, incompetent pizza chef who serves shit pizzas.

Instead of finding out why the customers wouldn't take a bite, he mocks them for failing to appreciate 'good pizza' and suggests that they make the pizzas themselves.

The correct pizza analogy is as follows:

There was a pizza chef who continually brags that he is super talented and the best pizza chef in the world. As such, he wants a ridiculous income and so he charges an outrageous price for people to eat his pizza. People don't want to pay this high price for the pizza, so he justifies it by saying how clean his restaurant is, how hygienic the toilet is, how crime free and beautiful is the neighbourhood in which his restaurant sits. People still don't want to pay for his overpriced pizza, so he puts all the other restaurants in town out of business. How does he do that? Well, it turns out that his brother in law is the Police Chief, and his wife issues the business licenses in the town, and his brother is the town's health inspector, etc. So, colluding with his family members, he ends up chasing out all the other eateries. Now the people have no choice but to pay high price for a mediocre pizza.

Is that the analogy that Kee Chiu was trying to use?
 
Last edited:

kukubird58

Alfrescian
Loyal
The issue is not Alex but the Minister.

He picked a poor analogy. And he is a cabinet minister. How to articulate the makeup and need for policies effectively if he can't even pick an appropriate analogy. People increasingly want to be more involved in the decision making process because the trust in the govt doing it right has diminished significantly. It does not help when the calibre of senior leaders are wanting. Remember the population White Paper.

Remember also the Brompton Case. Despite calls from social media and availability of pricing information on the web, Khaw ruled that it was done right. It took an internet CSI to show the relationship between Khaw's staff and the vendor, the suspicious timing of the tender etc to show how smelly it was.

If this Govt can't even tender for a bicycle properly and if this Govt can't even recognise that something is wrong from the rising crescendo of concerns expressed by numerous citizens, can we trust this govt to even make a pizza.
hahaha....again talking through your arse....
u never learnt to look at each case/issue on its own merit.....
ccs was right to say pple, especially younger gen wants to be involved in decision making process......period.
u have to add in your own spices to score points with retards here....
now can u tell us how many times u were caught bullshitting and proven wrong.....
do u really think u are more credible than miw??????
 
Last edited:

Yanzi

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
The correct pizza analogy is as follows:

There was a pizza chef who continually brags that he is super talented and the best pizza chef in the world. As such, he wants a ridiculous income and so he charges an outrageous price for people to eat his pizza. People don't want to pay this high price for the pizza, so he justifies it by saying how clean his restaurant is, how hygienic the toilet is, how crime free and beautiful is the neighbourhood in which his restaurant sits. People still don't want to pay for his overpriced pizza, so he puts all the other restaurants in town out of business. How does he do that? Well, it turns out that his brother in law is the Police Chief, and his wife issues the business licenses in the town, and his brother is the town's health inspector, etc. So, colluding with his family members, he ends up chasing out all the other eateries. Now the people have no choice but to pay high price for a mediocre pizza.

Is that the analogy that Kee Chiu was trying to use?

Good analogy. Points for you.
 

neddy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The issue is not Alex but the Minister.

He picked a poor analogy. And he is a cabinet minister. How to articulate the makeup and need for policies effectively if he can't even pick an appropriate analogy. People increasingly want to be more involved in the decision making process because the trust in the govt doing it right has diminished significantly. It does not help when the calibre of senior leaders are wanting. Remember the population White Paper.

Remember also the Brompton Case. Despite calls from social media and availability of pricing information on the web, Khaw ruled that it was done right. It took an internet CSI to show the relationship between Khaw's staff and the vendor, the suspicious timing of the tender etc to show how smelly it was.

If this Govt can't even tender for a bicycle properly and if this Govt can't even recognise that something is wrong from the rising crescendo of concerns expressed by numerous citizens, can we trust this govt to even make a pizza.

That is because he does not care, he could be ACTUALLY eating pizza while all these are happening because he catch no ball.
 
Last edited:
Top