• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

breaking news - trains delayed due to power outage

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Singaporeans are very lucky to have such an efficient system.

Auckland is a nightmare. There's a thread http://www.bettertransport.org.nz/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=2268 dedicated to Auckland transport stuff ups and it's still going strong. 223 pages so far and more added daily.

thanks! i will use this thread to highlight breakdowns, outages and gripes with bay area public transport systems. they're so bad these years they're getting on our collective nerves. :*:
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
it used to be bart and muni, now it's caltrains....
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/20...ng-problem-causes-systemwide-caltrain-delays/

sfo station power outage caused system wide delays....
http://www.breakingnews.com/topic/bay-area-rapid-transit/
http://inagist.com/all/445706456491253760/

site for raging and ranting on bart....this time a power outage in Berkeley....
http://bartrage.com/node/333

the moronic bart board and management have the audacity to cut off cellular coverage to stations if they think events hurt their public and pubic image... :rolleyes:
http://seattletimes.com/html/nationworld/2016905881_apustransitwirelesscut.html

with rain there was flooding, and then shutdown for both bart and muni....
http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/local/bart-muni-service-restored-following-flooding-powe/nTLSr/

transit workers' strike....
http://www.dailycal.org/tag/downtown-berkeley-bart-station/
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
ok, the last bart strike was ridiculous (which f*cking metro on this planet would allow a state transit monopoly to go on strike in the first place?! even chicago and nyc have laws that make it illegal for transit unions to go on strike), but what is more incredulous is the plethora of gov-run transit monopolies carving up territories and market pies for themselves. :rolleyes:

we have caltrains running the only fleet of commuter trains between sj and sf on the peninsula, bart running commuter trains in sf and east bay, muni running buses, trams and light rail within sf as spur and complementary services from sf bart stations to various sf localities, alameda county transit (act) running buses in alameda county on the east bay, contra costa county transit (ccct) running buses in contra costa county on the east bay, north of alameda county, valley transportation authority (vta) running buses and light rail in the south bay namely santa clara county which includes menlo park, palo alto, los altos, mountain view, sunnyvale, cupertino, santa clara, san jose, campbell, saratoga, morgan hill, gilroy, etc.

the management of these various transit authorities are staffed by former career politicians, civil servants, public administrators, union leaders and members, and lazy, incompetent fat cats and retirees and pensioners who have retired and collected pensions several times in their past careers and are now milking the system dry, by rotating and playing musical chairs from one transit authority to the next. it's the world's most corrupt, self-serving and incestuous system besides state and city admins and workers' unions, including but not limited to the police and firemen unions.

they carve up markets and territories, divide the spoils, and conquer the helpless commuters like pedophile fat arses reaming the innocent and nubile. average renumeration per fat cat is in the several hundreds of thousands of $ per year plus benefits and pensions and bonuses and health care for life and spouse. no wonder the only thing that crosses their minds when funds are depleted is to jack up the price of a ride. and this has been going on every year, with the interval for the next price hike getting shorter than less than a year. there's another class of authorities - the bridge toll authorities. :*: the toll across the golden gate bridge is currently at $6 without fastrak (with fastrac it's $5) but will increase to $7 on april 7, 2014.

http://goldengate.org/news/bridge/toll_increase_2014.php

more to cum.... :oIo:
 

Ash007

Alfrescian
Loyal
Over here when there is a train or bus strike, the stuff lets the public ride for free for the day. Costing the state government $$ instead of angering the public.
 

GoldenPeriod

Alfrescian
Loyal
The difference is Singapore, it's difficult to own your own transport. So once public transport mati, we are finished
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The difference is Singapore, it's difficult to own your own transport. So once public transport mati, we are finished

many riders on bart and caltrains do not have cars too. they are the working poor by bay area standards, and they are fully dependent on transit to get to their jobs. drivers who hop on public transport do it grudgingly because parking in sf is limited, extremely expensive and long walks away from their desired destination.
 

andrewteo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Once again it illustrates how well the SMRT is run compared to other mass transit systems around the world.

Singaporeans should count their blessings that the country's leaders are so capable.

Are you trying to be sarcastic or you had skipped your medication again?
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
reporting live from the ground. serious delays on bart this morning as equipment problems shut down the fremont-richmond line. since bart operates several lines using the same track (unlike smrt), the delays are widespread as it also affects the fremont-sf and pleasanton-sf lines. passengers going to richmond and pittsburg/bay point will have to transfer at west oakland catching the sf-richmond and sf-pittsburg lines respectively. :(
 

tyudm

Alfrescian
Loyal
thanks! i will use this thread to highlight breakdowns, outages and gripes with bay area public transport systems. they're so bad these years they're getting on our collective nerves. :*:

Are the transport systems owned or financially supported by the government?
Do they increase fare recommended by bodies appointed by the same government?
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Are the transport systems owned or financially supported by the government?
Do they increase fare recommended by bodies appointed by the same government?

yes and yes. at the city level, they work with their respective counties to get state funding and local taxpayers' money to run county transits which include buses, shuttles and light rails. sf is an anomaly in that she's both a city and a county due to her size and geographic confines. sf runs her own transit called "muni." muni offers bus, tram and light rail services. at the inter-county level, such as bart and caltrains, they are funded at the federal, state, county and municipal levels, including local taxpayers' expense. fare increases are recommended by each transit board, which is staffed by former gov workers, administrators, politicians, career civil servants who get "elected" to the board by their peers and state, county and city gov officials.
 

tyudm

Alfrescian
Loyal
yes and yes. at the city level, they work with their respective counties to get state funding and local taxpayers' money to run county transits which include buses, shuttles and light rails. sf is an anomaly in that she's both a city and a county due to her size and geographic confines. sf runs her own transit called "muni." muni offers bus, tram and light rail services. at the inter-county level, such as bart and caltrains, they are funded at the federal, state, county and municipal levels, including local taxpayers' expense. fare increases are recommended by each transit board, which is staffed by former gov workers, administrators, politicians, career civil servants who get "elected" to the board by their peers and state, county and city gov officials.

The diff is, here tpt co is a public co. One can own part of it thru' the stk xchange. The gov guarantees profitability cos' they are the biggest shareholder. Therefore breakdowns here should not be as frequent or serious as happened elsewhere.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The diff is, here tpt co is a public co. One can own part of it thru' the stk xchange. The gov guarantees profitability cos' they are the biggest shareholder. Therefore breakdowns here should not be as frequent or serious as happened elsewhere.

a public-listed company would be more susceptible to kpi pressures to perform at the bottom line and would tend to skim on costly maintenance, capital investments and operational expense. one would think breakdowns and service issues are supposed to be higher in this arrangement than purely gov-run outfits. the facts and figures are far from that assumption. gov-run transits in the bay area and elsewhere in the u.s. have more frequent delays, breakdowns, safety issues and service issues than any public-listed transit company in sg. :wink:
 
Top