• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Singapore aims to be Southeast Asia’s Silicon Valley

cheesecake

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Malaysia

As MSC falters, Singapore aims to be Southeast Asia’s Silicon Valley


February 27, 2014

singapore27_540_359_100.JPG

Tech firms are attracted to Singapore which offers Singapore offers good infrastructure, rule of law and
easy access to major markets. – Reuters pic, February 27, 2014.


Huge deals in Silicon Valley are pushing Singapore to go all out to build its own version of the American technology zone as the start-up hub for Southeast Asia – a dream once shared by Malaysia's Multimedia Super Corridor (MSC).

But Malaysia's MSC that started in 1996 has now faltered into a real estate play known more for call centres rather than what it was meant to be: a test bed for cutting edge tech as well as home to start-ups.

Over in Singapore, the Wall Street Journal reported that excited by deals such as Facebook's US$19 billion (RM62.7 billion) agreement last week to buy messaging company WhatsApp, Singapore's policy makers and technology entrepreneurs are betting that one day a tech giant could swoop down to grab one of its own home-grown start-ups.

Venture-capital tech investments in Singapore last year outstripped those in Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong, the global business daily said.

It noted that the city state, with its population of just 5.4 million, was not quite Silicon Valley and has yet to produce anything like a Google or Facebook, much less a service like China's messaging app Wechat, with 272 million monthly active users.

And while Singapore has had mixed success in trying to kick start innovation in various industries, including biotechnology, media and entertainment, the paper quoted investors as saying the technology ecosystem was becoming more active.

One concern is that insufficient entrepreneurial spirit among young Singaporeans and the government's financial largesse could inadvertently enable some start-ups to limp along on state funds, a few analysts told the Wall Street Journal.

But in recent years, the Singapore government has been trying to fund local technological innovation by investing some S$100 million (RM260 million) for early-stage start-ups as part of the S$16 billion it has pledged for scientific research and development.

Well-known American venture capital firms, such as Andreessen Horowitz, have funded local start-ups, including video site Viki, which Japanese online retailer Rakuten bought for US$200 million in September.

Rakuten also agreed earlier this month to acquire Cyprus-based messaging app Viber Media, it added.

Another Singaporean tech firm attracting investors is RedMart, an online grocery-delivery service founded in 2011 that has raised more than US$10 million from investors, including Facebook co-founder and Singapore resident Eduardo Saverin.

One hot spot in Singapore's fledgling start-up scene is a seven-storey, renovated factory building known as Block 71, west of downtown.

On a recent Friday evening, a few dozen technology entrepreneurs gathered to drink beer, nibble on cheese and almonds, and discuss their start-ups, the paper said.

Hugh Mason, a 47-year-old British entrepreneur, said there were about 100 start-ups and more than US$1 billion of investment under management in the building, the paper added.

In 2010, Mason and his friend, 38-year-old Singapore native and anti-spam pioneer Wong Meng Weng, co-founded Singapore's Joyful Frog Digital Incubator, which hosts frequent gatherings at its headquarters in Block 71.

Wong, decked out in a three-piece suit and carrying the company's green stuffed frog mascot Smoochy on his shoulder, moved about the room, introducing out-of-town visitors to regular attendees. A sign read, "Silicon Valley isn't a place. It's an idea".

Venture capital invested in Singaporean tech firms by funds last year totalled US$1.71 billion. While that is behind China's US$3.46 billion, it is ahead of Japan, South Korea and Hong Kong, according to data from Hong Kong-based Asian Venture Capital Journal.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the National Venture Capital Association put venture funding for software companies alone in the United States at US$11 billion last year.

Still, funding devoted to Singapore's tech firms, including from the government, skyrocketed last year to account for 19% of funding for Asia – up from just US$27.3 million, or 0.3%, in 2011, the paper reported.

Brad Templeton, a Silicon Valley-based Internet pioneer who consults with Google on self-driving cars, said while Singapore's tech scene seemed more active now than it was in previous years, he noted "too much government can hurt a start-up community rather than help it."

In its policies, Singapore's government has attempted to mimic Israel, which has developed a robust technology industry over the years, the business daily said.

One government programme designed to assist early stage start-ups is the "Technology Incubation Scheme," which began in 2010.

Under that programme, the government co-invests up to 85% of capital in select start-ups, capped at the equivalent of S$500,000.

Technology incubators – organisations typically run by start-up veterans who provide mentoring and physical space – pitch in the remaining 15% and are allowed to buy out the government's stake after three years. There are now 15 incubators and more than 100 start-ups participating in the programme.

"In the past, I might have funded two or three start-ups a year. Now I've been doing one a month," said Leslie Loh, who heads Singaporean venture capital firm Red Dot Ventures, which launched in 2011.

Douglas Abrams, who spent 14 years at JPMorgan in New York and has worked in Singapore's technology venture-capital industry since 2000, said there has been a marked increase in the value of Singaporean "exits" – when start-ups are acquired or sell stock to the public.

Abrams, now chief executive of technology venture capital firm Expara, said last year, some 20 firms had exits totalling more than S$400 million, compared with about S$50 million in previous years.

Razmig Hovaghimian, a 38-year-old American who started Viki as a class project at Stanford Business School, said he chose Singapore for its headquarters in part because of its proximity to key Asian markets.

Though Viki was able to attract Series A funding from Andreessen Horowitz, the company benefited from Singapore's sense of community, Hovaghimian was quoted as saying by the paper.

Steve Leonard, executive deputy chairman of Singapore's Infocomm Development Authority, which is tasked with building the country's technology industry, said Singapore offers good infrastructure, rule of law and easy access to major markets.

"We're still waiting for that Instagram or that WhatsApp," said Scott Anthony, a Singapore-based managing partner at consulting firm Innosight.

"It's going to be a few more years, but I think it's coming." – February 27, 2014.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/as-msc-falters-singapore-aims-to-be-southeast-asias-silicon-valley

Singapore unlikely to succeed due to lack of creativity and talents. The Singapore environment is not conducive in nurturing innovation and creativity. Sim Wong Hoo is a testimony of that!
 

da dick

Alfrescian
Loyal
99.9999% of IT workers here are india nehs or india PRs employed by MNCs like chittybank! you think those idiots with papermill degrees will create the next what's the fuck app?? in your sinkie dreams!
 

chonburifc

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I welcome more Ah Nehs to work here. With Ah Nehs IT expertise, we will soon overtake Silicon Valley!
 

Dark Knight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Our own 2 science park already cannot make it big to attract high tech firms.
Not even a small fraction of success compared to the real Silicon Valley.
 

da dick

Alfrescian
Loyal
I have your Singapore Silicon Valley right here:

984138_606020669410907_1975516531_n.jpg

the man is right. we should get doctor woffles wu for advice on how to kickstart the sinkies plastic surgery hub, and steal all the bizness from korea!!! plastick surgery in k-pop is veli popular rite?
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
you don't "build" silicon valley. it just happens. and it's not like silicon valley is pre-equipped with all the infrastructure, facilities and real estate planning for high tech innovation on day one. it's a hodgepodge of independent events and activities and chaotic mushrooming and collapsing of start ups and behemoths. it's never planned and it doesn't take orders and follow instructions. till now, we don't even have wi-if everywhere, and ultra broadband to many homes in the heart of the valley is practically non-existent. so we make do with 4g wireless. :rolleyes:
 

Agoraphobic

Alfrescian
Loyal
I don't know shit all about IT and high-tech crap. To this hub-hub thing, I'd say Singapore missed her chance to be a motorcycle hub of South-East Asia when the authorities did everything they could to stump out the "motor culture" that was starting to build up in the mid to late seventies and carried onto the eighties. There were local companies which fabricated their own expansion chambers for two-stroke engines, privateers who'd modify their cycles to improve their performance. All these were happening and gaining momentum when the authorities clamped down on them. Today, look at the market that exists for small capacity motorcycles in Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam. Myanmar will be next. Singapore missed out big on this, thanks to the gahmen.

Cheers!
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Sigh..here we go again ...... :rolleyes: Another pie in the sky goal:biggrin:

All these years the PAP has had so many plans which end up going nowhere. They want to be world class in everything but just look at PAP's track record. Failing infrastructure, disease & overcrowding, many of it's citizens struggling to make ends meet. :(

Maybe the problem lies with the management of Spore Inc :confused: How can you expect creativity in an environment where the system is tightly controlled by one family :confused:
 

GoldenPeriod

Alfrescian
Loyal
We are not interested.

Quality of living is much more than just $$$ or tech innovation. What's the point even if Singapore has the highest GDP per capita in the world and is Silicon Valley x100 when the public infrastructure cannot cope and shitloads of foreigners in our midst. I rather earn less $$$ and see Singapore a fishing village rather than an overcrowded urban slum with foreign scum.



Say no to FT's. Say no to globalisation.
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
"silicon valley" in the bay area is no longer confined to the santa clara valley which is the origin of that term. that was when transistors, integrated circuits and silicon wafers were first invented, and the valley was populated with fabs and plants producing them. while intel, amd, seagate, western digital, national semi-conductor are still around, supporting and supply chain industries doing fab and manufacturing have all moved to china. only r&d, some engineering and small production of prototypes are done here. much of the valley now has empty buildings, abandoned factories, shells of former start ups and tech companies. they are quickly being bulldozed now for housing after the housing market picks up.

the "valley" today actually encompasses sf, the peninsula from sf, san mateo down to menlo park, palo alto, mountain view, sunnyvale, cupertino, santa clara, san jose and up northeastwards to militias, fremont, pleasanton, dublin, san ramon, walnut creek, berkeley and emeryville.

sf to sj today are dominated by software, gadgetry and mobile giants. a bunch of biotech firms such as genentech (roche) dot the landscape from san bruno (south sf) to palo alto to south san jose. computing and data center firms such as hp, oracle and ibm are still around, but they are being overshadowed by apple and google in sheer stock value and attention. but they are still a force to be reckoned with. microsoft tries to gain a foothold in the valley by occupying a campus off 101 in mountain view, and poaching engineers and inventors from apple and google is what they do best. never underestimate intel and the war chest it has accumulated over decades, although mistakes have been made in the mobile and wireless arena. samsung has just gotten into the act in sj by building a high rise r&d campus on tasman and north 1st. networking companies such as cisco, juniper, alcatel-lucent, brocade, ericsson (yes, ericsson has moved their ip routing hq to north sj) are concentrated between north sj and mountain view. security networking startups such as palo alto networks and deep packet, load balancing, and switching powerhouses such as a10, f5 and arista are centered between sc and sj. plus oss, tools, sniffers and other deep dive companies. not to forget some of the most secretive, advanced radio, cellular and wireless communication inventions and prototypes are happening here (you don't get to hear about them until 2 to 3 years later).

and auto and space vehicle startups are taking form, releasing models, and shaking up the industry and the universe by storm. for example, tesla is based in palo alto and the factory is in fremont. bmw and mercedes benz have set up r&d centers here. they have little to no choice. and so are the japanese, korean, and chinese auto companies. the asian auto r&d offices here are mostly covers for industrial espionage.

sg? sg will be better off as a playground and tax shelter for the wealthy. :rolleyes:
 

eatshitndie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
by the way, the world's largest operators china mobile, ntt docomo, and vodafone have r&d facilities on the peninsula. where the fuck is singtel? :rolleyes:
 

ChaoPappyPoodle

Alfrescian
Loyal
There is zero success story. Viki was founded by Koreans who were encouraged to move here only to receive government grants. It alot like how PAPzis pay for China atheletes to represent Singapore. The MDA and IDA cannot make it to idenitfy quality since they are so fucked up themselves. A lot of the funds go into huge GLCs that suck up the grants and do fuckall.
 

batman1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singapore is an authoritarian state that prevents n curbs innovation
and creativity.Singapore will never be a Silicon Valley hub.
These dumbfuck retarded MIW really lost touch with realities.
U cannot create Silicon Valley hub in Land Of Slaves .
Condemn the MIW !!!
 

po2wq

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
again, nutting but another boast n tok big n tink dey r 1 crass above others ...

oredi boasted so many tis hub dat hub ... sinkielan shud juz concentrate on being a gambling hub ...
 

enterprise2

Alfrescian
Loyal
"silicon valley" in the bay area is no longer confined to the santa clara valley which is the origin of that term. that was when transistors, integrated circuits and silicon wafers were first invented, and the valley was populated with fabs and plants producing them. while intel, amd, seagate, western digital, national semi-conductor are still around, supporting and supply chain industries doing fab and manufacturing have all moved to china. only r&d, some engineering and small production of prototypes are done here. much of the valley now has empty buildings, abandoned factories, shells of former start ups and tech companies. they are quickly being bulldozed now for housing after the housing market picks up.

the "valley" today actually encompasses sf, the peninsula from sf, san mateo down to menlo park, palo alto, mountain view, sunnyvale, cupertino, santa clara, san jose and up northeastwards to militias, fremont, pleasanton, dublin, san ramon, walnut creek, berkeley and emeryville.

sf to sj today are dominated by software, gadgetry and mobile giants. a bunch of biotech firms such as genentech (roche) dot the landscape from san bruno (south sf) to palo alto to south san jose. computing and data center firms such as hp, oracle and ibm are still around, but they are being overshadowed by apple and google in sheer stock value and attention. but they are still a force to be reckoned with. microsoft tries to gain a foothold in the valley by occupying a campus off 101 in mountain view, and poaching engineers and inventors from apple and google is what they do best. never underestimate intel and the war chest it has accumulated over decades, although mistakes have been made in the mobile and wireless arena. samsung has just gotten into the act in sj by building a high rise r&d campus on tasman and north 1st. networking companies such as cisco, juniper, alcatel-lucent, brocade, ericsson (yes, ericsson has moved their ip routing hq to north sj) are concentrated between north sj and mountain view. security networking startups such as palo alto networks and deep packet, load balancing, and switching powerhouses such as a10, f5 and arista are centered between sc and sj. plus oss, tools, sniffers and other deep dive companies. not to forget some of the most secretive, advanced radio, cellular and wireless communication inventions and prototypes are happening here (you don't get to hear about them until 2 to 3 years later).

and auto and space vehicle startups are taking form, releasing models, and shaking up the industry and the universe by storm. for example, tesla is based in palo alto and the factory is in fremont. bmw and mercedes benz have set up r&d centers here. they have little to no choice. and so are the japanese, korean, and chinese auto companies. the asian auto r&d offices here are mostly covers for industrial espionage.

sg? sg will be better off as a playground and tax shelter for the wealthy. :rolleyes:

The term 'silicon' valley is already outdated. Today it's not about chips or electronics anymore!! It's about Facebook, Google...etc. Who knows ..about Sammyboy and Sam can strike it rich!!
 

Jah_rastafar_I

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
you don't "build" silicon valley. it just happens. and it's not like silicon valley is pre-equipped with all the infrastructure, facilities and real estate planning for high tech innovation on day one. it's a hodgepodge of independent events and activities and chaotic mushrooming and collapsing of start ups and behemoths. it's never planned and it doesn't take orders and follow instructions. till now, we don't even have wi-if everywhere, and ultra broadband to many homes in the heart of the valley is practically non-existent. so we make do with 4g wireless. :rolleyes:

Speaking of 4G the problem in sg with 4G are the data charges. The cheapest 4G plans around only allow 2GB of data which isn't enough if you want to watch HD vids. Prepaid charges suck too with 3GB of data for $30 for example. Only singtel's prepaid is the best with 14GB of data for 7 days at $25.

Are the 4G data charges cheaper in US? Should be cos you aren't going to be downloading or engaging in high data transfers if the prices are expensive.
 
Top