• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Auditors unable to provide audit opinion on AHPETC's financial statements

streetcry

Alfrescian
Loyal
The Ministry of National Development (MND) has flagged its concerns over the latest financial statements of the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) for the financial year ended March 31, 2013.


aljunied-hougang-punggol.png




SINGAPORE: The Ministry of National Development (MND) has flagged its concerns over the latest financial statements of the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) for the financial year ended March 31, 2013.

The independent auditors -- Foo Kon Tan Grant Thornton -- engaged by AHPETC said in a report that the town council had not complied with the provisions of the Town Councils Act and the Town Councils Financial Rules.

The town council, run by the Workers' Party, had submitted its statements on Monday, nearly six months late and after seven reminders.

All town councils had been required to submit their financial statements by August 31, 2013.

The auditors also made what's described as a "Disclaimer of Opinion", which means they were unable to express an opinion on the financial position of the town council due to insufficient evidence.

Disclaimers of Opinion are issued by auditors when they refuse to sign off on financial statements completely, due to lack of information.

In the case of the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council, the auditors listed 13 points in its disclaimer.

A key area highlighted was related party transactions.

The independent auditors said the town council had not made available details of project management service fees paid to a related party.

The town council had said in its financial statements that it had appointed FM Solutions and Services as its Managing Agent after the 2011 General Election.

The managing director of the company, Mr Danny Loh, is also the secretary of the town council.

Mr Loh’s wife, Ms How Weng Fan, is a director of the company and also acted as the town council's general manager.

The company had been paid a management agent fee of some S$5.3 million.

Related party transactions refer to those where the town council’s key management personnel have a personal financial interest.

Among the other areas cited in the auditors' report were the town council's opening balances, lift repair balances and lift upgrading expenses.

The auditor also noted that the town council had not transferred monies into its Sinking Funds as was required under the Town Councils Financial Rules.


There were also questions over the validity of receipts collected.

The auditors said they were unable to determine the validity and accuracy of various items in the town council's accounts, including receivables of some S$1.8 million, lift repair and lift upgrading expenses of some S$20 million, and temporary unidentified receipts from residents and the HDB of about S$308,000.

Other items included advance receipts from residents in respect of conservancy and service charges of some S$507,000.

There were also unidentified differences of GST payable of some S$518,000 and unreconciled differences of some S$63,000 in cash and bank balances.

The town council had also received nearly S$521,000 from the Citizens Consultative Committee but the receipts could not be identified and matched to other records.

The auditors also said AHPETC had not made available to the auditors its latest management accounts and records of minutes subsequent to the financial year-end, to allow the auditors to ascertain whether AHPETC's financial statements properly reflected adjustments or disclosures needed in light of relevant subsequent events.

The Ministry of National Development noted that the financial statements had only been submitted after seven reminders, and that this was the second year the town council's auditors have submitted a disclaimer of opinion on its accounts.

The ministry said in a statement that this is a "cause for concern".

The independent auditors have submitted their report to the Auditor-General as required under the law.

MND press statement on AHPETC's FY2012 audited financial statements (PDF 190.44KB)

- CNA/al
 
Last edited:

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Aiyah! this is just an isolated case lah!...it takes 52 man years to audit, what!? have we forgotten?? two years...sup, sup lah! further more they inherited the accounts from George Yeo & company...must be in a big mess before...the auditor just blindly approve in the past... " ga gi lang" mah!
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
(b) the auditors had not been able to determine the completeness of the related party disclosures in AHPETC as the TC had not made available to the auditors details of project management service fees paid to a related party. (Related party transactions refer to transactions where the TC's key management personnel have a personal financial interest.)

(c) AHPETC had not made available to the auditors its latest management accounts and records of minutes subsequent to the financial year end, to allow the auditors to ascertain whether AHPETC's financial statements properly reflected adjustments or disclosures needed in light of relevant subsequent events.

(d) the auditors were unable to determine the validity and accuracy of various items in AHPETC's accounts, including receivables of some $1.8 million recorded in Sundry Debtors, lift repair and lift upgrading expenses of some $20 million, temporary unidentified receipts from residents and HDB of some $308,000, and advance receipts from residents in respect of conservancy and service charges of some $507,000. There were also unexplained differences of GST payable of some $518,000 and unreconciled differences of some $63,000 in cash and bank balances.

Are the auditors accusing AHPETC of not cooperating?
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
To all, please be objective in your criticisms/comments.

It is another 'do the opposition in' attack. How many big firms in sinkapore dare to take on business from the opposition? No one. So, that this firm takes on the business from the opposition is a reason to suspect the intent.
 

tanwahp

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
What AHPETC needs is to engage a financial consultant to tidy up the accounts. There are many and they are not beholden to PAP. Not doing so may be to save costs, quite commonly heaped upon managing agent which may not have expertise.

But there was no impropriety or abscondence of money or the auditor would have alerted CPIB rather than not comment. Just that the categorization is messy, which is what the auditor is pointing out, they can't comment because accounting procedures is not according.
 

johnny333

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
But there was no impropriety or abscondence of money or the auditor would have alerted CPIB rather than not comment. Just that the categorization is messy, which is what the auditor is pointing out, they can't comment because accounting procedures is not according.


Maybe they have already alerted the CPIB but since the investigations are in the initial stages they can't come out & say a crime has been committed :smile:
 

wMulew

Alfrescian
Loyal
Dumbfuck opposition supporting retards in denial. $20M unaccounted for in WP's account and they are trying to come up with cock and bull story to defend them
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Hokie Dokie let Mister Know It All enlighten Singaporeans
On the role of Parliament and by implication its members
 
Last edited:

palden

Alfrescian
Loyal
Come to aljunied sengkang east and hougang. The places are rotting at an amazing pace. Vote out WP in 2016.
 

Asterix

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Scrutinise Government and introduce new laws are the gist
Nowhere in this video from Mother of all Parliaments
Is town council mentioned and rightly so cause it’s civil servants’ job
Oops I forgot to mention your Prime Minister and his Cabinet
Plus whoever came up with town council idea are a bunch of monkeys


[video=youtube;AmGCwiQvhH0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AmGCwiQvhH0[/video]
 

3_M

Alfrescian
Loyal
The authority needs to report the irregularity to CAD and CPIB if they sense something is wrong. What stopping them?
 

Poomer

Alfrescian
Loyal
Dumbfuck opposition supporting retards in denial. $20M unaccounted for in WP's account and they are trying to come up with cock and bull story to defend them

How a $2 company gets a contract worth hundreds of thousands from all the PAP TCs is a wonder too.
 
Top