• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Economic News

mpan12

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singapore ALREADY got implicated, and seriously too.
The statement from MAS said that this 1MDB scandal saga had dented SG's reputation as a clean and trusted international financial centre.
One off-shore bank, BSI, had been closed and now several other banks were also found involved in the money laundering activities including DBS, StandChart and UBS.
MAS now vows to enhance controls against money-laundering and will take swift action against banks following damaging findings that financial institutions in the SG handled money flows linked to 1MDB.

Perhaps SG had very much earlier found those banking "irregularities" involving 1MDB but made no announcement, always say "investigation in progress".
Every time someone make an announcement, SG follow immediately after.
When the Swiss made an announcement, SG followed and closed BSI, when the US filed the law suit, SG announced the assets seizure.

Not sure if any particular person in SG will be implicated. I think for the US and SG, being 1st world countries, they are more concerned about their reputations as respected financial centres. They don't want their names to be tainted. That's the first priority. There may not be specific people involved in the lapses. It's more like how to tighten their systems against money laundering in general.

As for Malaysia, it's a cowboy place with complex dirty politics and government. Let them settle their own affairs. Though from what we know and can expect, Najib could just get away free again if he plays his cards right. Again.
 

rotikok

Alfrescian
Loyal
Why would retailers closed shop when the business is good and at the same time, the landlord losing his rental collection in hundreds of thousands $$$ monthly? Go and take a good look first, the shop lots or shuttered ones are here and there and ALL OVER the mall, on all floors.

Telling you fact, you ask for logic...ask aeon la, they rich, dont care, cannot meh? Go and take a good look first, is it here n there or just one side 3 level of the mall that kena. Who know they may plan inner mall like city square like that to create more space? You peek through the board and see.

Have you been to some of the theme parks mentioned - Hello Kitty Theme Park @ Puteri Harbour and Angry Birds Theme Park @ JBCC?
If you've been, any comments and will you go again?
Went to angry bird park b4. No, not my cake but i do see kids will pull their parent into komtar, impact small but the bird park is just atas type of community playground, cost to build and kids they attract is ok, dont think they rugi. Legoland everyday got tourist bus bring tourists in. But profitable or not...not sure. But Merlin entertainment invest in this legoland again, ninjago 4d ride, first in asia interactive ride with new technology used... why they do that yea if poor business?

Every time someone make an announcement, SG follow immediately after.
When the Swiss made an announcement, SG followed and closed BSI, when the US filed the law suit, SG announced the assets seizure.

Singapore actually very lenient to foreign launderer, if they want, many chinese Indonesian kena ady. If not bcoz of mahathir complain, DoJ dont even bother. During conference journalist questioning section, most of the question were asking about US cops shooting incident. Suddenly feel malaysia is sibeh safe country. Malaysia cowboy security still lose to the real cowboy. At least come here just kena rob, not kena shoot.
 

xebay11

Alfrescian
Loyal
Singapore ALREADY got implicated, and seriously too.
The statement from MAS said that this 1MDB scandal saga had dented SG's reputation as a clean and trusted international financial centre.
One off-shore bank, BSI, had been closed and now several other banks were also found involved in the money laundering activities including DBS, StandChart and UBS.
MAS now vows to enhance controls against money-laundering and will take swift action against banks following damaging findings that financial institutions in the SG handled money flows linked to 1MDB.

Perhaps SG had very much earlier found those banking "irregularities" involving 1MDB but made no announcement, always say "investigation in progress".
Every time someone make an announcement, SG follow immediately after.
When the Swiss made an announcement, SG followed and closed BSI, when the US filed the law suit, SG announced the assets seizure.

Please lah MAS and all the banks act blur from the beginning, face it, the only viable industry left in Singapore is money laundering, with these findings DBS and the rest already lost $240 million, pfft deposits gone, do you know how much more dirty money is parked here with other corrupt ministers? I personally know that Thanksin owns a 5th floor property at Hilltops, you can guess how many millions he has parked here.

I am sure the banks are now very reluctantly assisting in the 1MDB saga, and hoping the investigations do not cause panic and make other dirty money start to empty accounts and fleeing as corrupted businessmen and politicians are all watching to see any signs of panic and flee with the money. The finance industry would be left with a huge hole.

Singapore is not as clean as one thinks.
 
Last edited:

FHBH12

Alfrescian
Loyal
Indonesian tax amnesty could spark outflow from Singapore wealth industry

Reuters Monday, Jul 25, 2016

SINGAPORE - Singapore's wealth management industry is likely to suffer a bad dent as rich Indonesians move some money back home to take advantage of a tax amnesty, but the exodus of funds isn't going to be as big as Jakarta is predicting.

Around US$200 billion (S$272.09 billion) of Indonesian money that may not have been declared to the tax authorities in Jakarta has been squirreled away in Singapore, according to private banking sources. It is a huge portion of the approximately US$470 billion of assets under management by private banks in the financial hub.

Consultants, lawyers and bankers closely involved with the industry expect roughly US$30 billion to go to Indonesia under the amnesty, which was launched last week and allows all past evasion sins to be forgiven upon the payment of up to 5 per cent tax on the money.

This is below the US$76 billion projected by the Indonesian government and the US$42 billion forecast by its central bank.

At the Monetary Authority of Singapore's annual news conference on Monday, its managing director Ravi Menon said he doesn't expect big outflows of funds, and he stressed that the city won't be taking any particular action to stem any such transfers.

Still, government revenue from taxing US$30 billion could still be as much as three times higher than the money recouped during a previous Indonesian tax amnesty in 2008, which only pulled in about US$500 million in tax.

One of the key reasons for this is that Singapore is becoming a less hospitable place to avoid tax authorities and other arms of government around the world, and there is an increasing likelihood that the Indonesian government will learn more about funds parked in the city anyway.

That is because of increasing pressure on Singapore's banks to crack down on laundering of money that is the result of corruption or other illegal acts, and to be more transparent about who they do business with. There is also a global push for more co-operation to avoid tax evasion, especially after the release of the Panama Papers showing the use of offshore shelters by government officials, businessmen and other prominent individuals around the world.

The use of Singapore banks by key players in the alleged theft of billions of dollars from the Malaysian government fund 1MDB, highlighted by the US government's move last week to freeze assets bought with the money, has only added to the pressure.

"The difference between this and other tax amnesties is that ... there's a big risk that all the information is shared with tax authorities," said Dustin Daugherty, an associate for ASEAN Business Intelligence at Dezan Shira & Associates, a consultancy firm for foreign investors.

"Because of the timing we might see a bigger impact than normal ... We expect 10-15 per cent, which should still be considered a success." A Singapore-based private banker and a lawyer, both of whom declined to be named, also estimated around 15 per cent of the money might move back home, based on feedback from their clients.

CURRENCY GYRATIONS

Still, while the prospect of paying a small amount to remove the possibility of being hit by big tax evasion charges is enticing, some of the amnesty rules make it unappealing for many.

The main hurdle, private bankers say, is a requirement that the money be kept in Indonesia for at least three years once the amnesty is granted.

This exposes those moving the money to Indonesia to the gyrations of the Indonesian rupiah, which has dropped more than 20 per cent against the US dollar in the past three years.

Also, the money can only be invested in a list of assets drafted by the government. This includes government bonds, bonds issues by state-owned companies and real estate. "Getting stuck there for three years is a big concern," said Chris Woo, tax leader at consultants PwC Singapore.

"Moving money back to Indonesia comes with some peace of mind, but can come at a tremendous cost as well."

Furthermore, clients are hesitant because the amnesty rates apply only to historical tax liabilities. Any new income will be taxed at higher rates than in Singapore - for example, the top income rate for individuals in Singapore is 22 per cent for income of S$320,000 while in Indonesia it is 30 per cent for an income of 500 million rupiah.

- See more at: http://business.asiaone.com/news/in...ingapore-wealth-industry#sthash.ls9UscKK.dpuf
 

mpan12

Alfrescian
Loyal
Have you been to some of the theme parks mentioned - Hello Kitty Theme Park @ Puteri Harbour and Angry Birds Theme Park @ JBCC?
If you've been, any comments and will you go again?
Those are also known as "theme park", but as a crowd puller, they had failed miserably.
If the LEGOLAND, which was built @ US$200 mil still have problems pulling in crowd and that's the kind of "theme park" that these people are building, then good luck to them.
Anyway, no harm just talking about.

I thought 1-2 years ago, they mentioned there would be several theme parks in Iskandar. But so far none of them have materialized after Legoland. Now they are back at it again?

Those Iskandar IRDA guys seem to be lacking in ideas on how to develop the place. They've got too much land but trying to throw a dart and see where it ends up. First, they sold lands and allowed developers to build almost limitless condos, then they realized Opps... wrong, now must build more commercial properties while trying hard to get foreign companies in. Then now it's back the the "theme park" plan again.

I passed by Hello Kitty in PH but didn't know it is a theme park! Thought it is just a shop among other shops. Was expecting something much bigger and outdoors.

As for Legoland, been there but unlikely to go back again. Nothing special. The carpark area looks rough and seems like still under construction.

Hope the next theme parks, if they really build, will be something more grand, fun and inviting.
 

Frodo

Alfrescian
Loyal
Have you been to some of the theme parks mentioned - Hello Kitty Theme Park @ Puteri Harbour and Angry Birds Theme Park @ JBCC?
If you've been, any comments and will you go again?
Those are also known as "theme park", but as a crowd puller, they had failed miserably.
If the LEGOLAND, which was built @ US$200 mil still have problems pulling in crowd and that's the kind of "theme park" that these people are building, then good luck to them.
Anyway, no harm just talking about.

I have only been to Legoland so far, even had two years of annual passes. Its good for the kids and in that sense, is good. In my view, the more quality theme parks in JB the more it will be a better "backyard playground" to go to for Singaporeans. If they are done generally well, surrounding shops and amenities and hotels will likely accompany them. Good to be hopeful that such plans will materialised.
 

Tekkun

Alfrescian
Loyal
I have only been to Legoland so far, even had two years of annual passes. Its good for the kids and in that sense, is good. In my view, the more quality theme parks in JB the more it will be a better "backyard playground" to go to for Singaporeans. If they are done generally well, surrounding shops and amenities and hotels will likely accompany them. Good to be hopeful that such plans will materialised.

When I first went to Legoland 2 years ago, the hotel and the water park were not there yet. I believe it is a lot better now.

attachment.php
 

Frodo

Alfrescian
Loyal
When I first went to Legoland 2 years ago, the hotel and the water park were not there yet. I believe it is a lot better now.

attachment.php

In my view, it certainly is! Especially when compared to 10 years ago when probably nothing was there....literally!

While there is still much room for growth and improvement, the changes that have been taking place, even if slowly, are good. Things are looking nicer all the time, or most of the time. Condos are rising up from the ground, more landed properties are being developed, things are beginning to take shape. Maybe the evolution of Johor follows a more Darwinian mode, not the punctuated equilibrium type of monstrous sudden change. LOL!
 

snowbird

Alfrescian
Loyal
The controversial National Security Council (NSC) Act 2016 that allows the government to hold emergency powers is set to be in force on August 1 this year.
This NSC Act proposal was rushed through hastily and did not receive express royal assent and was gazetted without amendments despite the Conference of Rulers saying last February that some of the provisions should be refined.
Perhaps that was not done without a reason and purpose.
Now, with this 1MDB mega scandal brewing hotter day by day and the person "Malaysian Official 1" named by the US DoJ may become extremely desperate to save himself.
For those ignorant ones, please better get know what this NSC Act is all about and how it can affect the people when enforced!
 

Investor888

Alfrescian
Loyal
The PSA volume has been declining and now PSA is no longer world #1 and every quarter the sales and volume are dropping.

At this rate they are losing out sales to PTP and other neighbouring ports, there is no need to wait for KRA Canal to materialise before PSA become a NOL.



I hope the canal will not realise within our life time. There have been rumours that the work has already started.

http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2016/01/27/thailand-kra-canal-china-silk-road/
 

sgtsk

Alfrescian
Loyal
I hope the canal will not realise within our life time. There have been rumours that the work has already started.

http://www.wallstreetdaily.com/2016/01/27/thailand-kra-canal-china-silk-road/

I think China thailand would not build kra canal in the next 10 years at least. What is more feasible and less offensive to singapore is to expand port klang, malaca port and may be ptp. Malaysia and China already signed agreements to expand port klang, and malacca port into deep water port. These malaysian ports would be used as centres for collecting and distributing goods in SE. It is stated that 80% of traffic passing through straits of malacca are China ships, so the impacts of such developments are very significant for Singapore. But then singapore could convert its potential excessive port space for US navy.
 

snowbird

Alfrescian
Loyal
The PSA volume has been declining and now PSA is no longer world #1 and every quarter the sales and volume are dropping.

At this rate they are losing out sales to PTP and other neighbouring ports, there is no need to wait for KRA Canal to materialise before PSA become a NOL.

In terms of total TEUs handled, PSA is the world's 2nd busiest port, after Shanghai.
Out of 10 busiest ports in the world, 7 including Hongkong are in China!
This is because by nature, China is the world's biggest exporter.
But Singapore is the world's biggest transhipment hub, with connection to over 600 ports worldwide and this is the most important and is PSA's main advantage.

The Kra Canal, if successfully completed 10 years later will some but little little impact to PSA's status and business as a regional hub.
Ships from US west coast, Japan, S Korea, China will still call at PSA for transhipment and moreover, some of the world's biggest oil refineries are in SG.
The proposed Canal, only cut about 1.5 days of shipping time compare to Panama and Suez which cuts weeks of sailing time while an expensive Canal Toll and long waiting time may discourage it's usage.
The Canal does benefit China the most because as a major crude importer, all the crude containers from the Middle East could use this Canal and save time and fuel.
Also, direct China/Europe ships can also use this Canal to save time and fuel.
 
Top