• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Desmand Kuek Bak Chye SMRT CEO since 1 Oct 2012 (1 yrs anniversary)

gingerlyn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
desmond Kuek.jpg

President and CEO of SMRT Corporation Limited
Lieutenant-General (R),
PJG, PBM, PPA(E), Datuk Paduka Seri

Train operator SMRT has confirmed that former Chief of Defence Force, Mr Desmond Kuek will serve as the company's new chief executive and president.

Mr Kuek will start his new role on Oct 1, after leaving the Administrative Service on Sept 30.

http://www.straitstimes.com/breakin...s-desmond-kuek-new-president-and-ceo-20120814

what do you think of SMRT Service level and KPI? Improving? do you think Desmand Kuek is a better CEO than Saw Phaik Hwa?
 

scoobydoo

Alfrescian
Loyal
View attachment 12367

President and CEO of SMRT Corporation Limited
Lieutenant-General (R),
PJG, PBM, PPA(E), Datuk Paduka Seri

Train operator SMRT has confirmed that former Chief of Defence Force, Mr Desmond Kuek will serve as the company's new chief executive and president.

Mr Kuek will start his new role on Oct 1, after leaving the Administrative Service on Sept 30.

http://www.straitstimes.com/breakin...s-desmond-kuek-new-president-and-ceo-20120814

what do you think of SMRT Service level and KPI? Improving? do you think Desmand Kuek is a better CEO than Saw Phaik Hwa?

hmm, chief of defence force under ex-chief of navy, now MOT.
 

Dark Knight

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
View attachment 12367

President and CEO of SMRT Corporation Limited
Lieutenant-General (R),
PJG, PBM, PPA(E), Datuk Paduka Seri

Train operator SMRT has confirmed that former Chief of Defence Force, Mr Desmond Kuek will serve as the company's new chief executive and president.

Mr Kuek will start his new role on Oct 1, after leaving the Administrative Service on Sept 30.

http://www.straitstimes.com/breakin...s-desmond-kuek-new-president-and-ceo-20120814

what do you think of SMRT Service level and KPI? Improving? do you think Desmand Kuek is a better CEO than Saw Phaik Hwa?

From the views of SMRT workers, this chap is extremely "yaya papaya".
He has pissed off many of the old birds in SMRT and a lot of them were either asked or forced to leave.
He has been recruiting a lot of his old time SAF buddies to join SMRT.
He is no difference from that Saw in practicing nepotism and does not knows how to treasure the experience staffs.

Based on several recent train breakdown cases, he didn't and can't do much to improve the maintenance of the trains, tracks and systems.
All trains, tracks and system are still very worn down and waiting for more screw ups.
He has a pair of eyes on his forehead and only knows how to manage using his helicopter vision.
A very wayang chap who knows how to present himself well right in front of the media and TV.
He has no substance, experience and even knowledge about trains even though he is trained in engineering science from Oxford.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
He has done an excellent job over the past year and the huge improvement in SMRT operations is there for all to see.

This proves beyond doubt that the SAF produces leaders of high calibre who can take charge of any situation or organisation.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
any good example? SMRT shares price drops by 24% since Oct 2012 while STI increases by 2%

That shows he has his priorities right and is concentrating on service levels and long term reliability. This requires large amounts of capital expenditure and an increase in overheads.

Under the previous CEO, SMRT lost its way and concentrated on non core areas instead of operations. The retail outlets brought huge profits while the train service played 2nd fiddle.
 

gingerlyn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
That shows he has his priorities right and is concentrating on service levels and long term reliability. This requires large amounts of capital expenditure and an increase in overheads.

How about this:
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/smrt-sbs-transit-fined/832502.html

LTA is imposing financial penalties of S$860,000 on SMRT for four separate incidents that happened in 2012 and 2013.
The heaviest penalty of S$300,000 is for the Newton station trackside fire incident in February this year.

Nearly 18,000 passengers were affected.

LTA said SMRT had committed several lapses. These include detraining passengers at Newton station rather than at an earlier station further away from the fire.

SMRT was also slapped with a S$60,000 penalty for a train launching incident at Bukit Panjang LRT depot in July this year.

Do you think Desmond Kuek shall bear some responsibilities?
Or Maybe Desmond Kuek shall blame it on his lower rank colleagues? Just like Mr Wong Kan Seng who put the blame on Gurkha army when Mas Selamat run away?
The GC guard escorting Mas Selamat did not stop Mas Selamat from
closing the urinal cubicle door in the Family Visitation Block toilet;
Page 3:
http://www4.mha.gov.sg/data/NewsFiles/910_ExecutiveSummarySectionoftheCOIreport.pdf
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Do you think Desmond Kuek shall bear some responsibilities?

Years of mismanagement cannot be fixed overnight. However, I have full confidence that he's taking the SMRT to greater heights. In a couple of year's time, all these incidences will be but distant memories.
 

gingerlyn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Years of mismanagement cannot be fixed overnight. However, I have full confidence that he's taking the SMRT to greater heights. In a couple of year's time, all these incidences will be but distant memories.

do you mean SMRT (GLC) and LTA have been neglecting public transportation for years?
do you mean PAP regime have been taking things for granted as sinkie gave their enbloc votes in 1990s and 200s?

do you think sinkie shall continue to trust PAP with all these years of mismanagements?

http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/government-must-keep-singaporeans-trust-pm-lee
 
Last edited:

Equalisation

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Years of mismanagement QUOTE]

do you mean SMRT (GLC) and LTA have been neglecting public transportation for years?
do you mean PAP regime have been taking things for granted as sinkie gave their enbloc votes in 1990s and 200s?

do you think sinkie shall continue to trust PAP with all these years of mismanagements?

http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/government-must-keep-singaporeans-trust-pm-lee

Trust ?:confused:

Are you kidding ?:mad:

Just look at the CPF issue. They have stopped giving us all OUR hard-earned CPF money at age 55 !:oIo:
 

gingerlyn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
SMRT has nothing to do with the PAP.

Please stop messing up the quote tags.

what do you mean SMRT has got nothing to do with PAP?

SMRT is Government Linked Corporation.

Government = PAP no?
which political party forms Singapore government?
 

jw5

Moderator
Moderator
Loyal
Aren't sinkies supposed to give him 5 years? Only 1 year mah, 4 more to go......................
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
what do you mean SMRT has got nothing to do with PAP?

SMRT is Government Linked Corporation.

Government = PAP no?
which political party forms Singapore government?

Using your logic the citizens (you) chose the PAP (govt) to run the show so that makes all the problems of the SMRT your fault. Why didn't the citizens fix the problem back in the 2011 elections.
 

TopSage

Alfrescian
Loyal
Years of mismanagement cannot be fixed overnight. However, I have full confidence that he's taking the SMRT to greater heights. In a couple of year's time, all these incidences will be but distant memories.

I have to agree with some points above. People hammer Saw for not doing her job. So if that is true, it cannot be expected that the next feller can just turn the ship ard by just snapping his fingers. It takes time.

Sometimes critics are not so consistent. While you can grouse that he is not trained in area of public transport, and he hired a bunch of SAF men you think are not cut out for the job, etc. To conclude he cannot succeed based on 1 year is quite ridiculous and inconsistent with the claim Saw was completely negligent and must have under maintained the system.
 

Leongsam

High Order Twit / Low SES subject
Admin
Asset
Saw was completely negligent and must have under maintained the system.

Saw had one goal and one alone and that was profitability and she achieved it by concentrating on the secondary retail income instead of the primary operation which is to provide public transport to the masses.

The share price soared and the shareholders were happy. Those that realised that there was a ticking time bomb on their hands quit the scene and left her to her own devices.
 

gingerlyn

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Saw had one goal and one alone and that was profitability and she achieved it by concentrating on the secondary retail income instead of the primary operation which is to provide public transport to the masses.

do you think it is the board of directors of SMRT (which Temasek is the biggest share holder and again is PAP) that squeeze Madam Saw to make extraordinary profits?

so Saw has no choice but to improve revenue and cut maintenance cost and that is why we have the problems today.

You inf me just now but this is my idea.
 
Top