Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 36

Thread: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,504
    My Reputation Points: 3156 / Power: 11

    Default Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    High Court upholds anti-gay sex law, gay couple's appeal rejected
    By Shah Salimat | Yahoo! Newsroom – 12 hours ago

    Getty Images - Singapore's High Court upheld the controversial Section 377A law criminalising sex between two men, after a challenge by a gay couple (Getty Images)
    Singapore's High Court ruled on Friday that a law banning intercourse between men still stands, after a gay couple filed a legal challenge calling for the law to be unconstitutional.

    Justice Quentin Loh gave his verdict after reserving judgment when the case was heard on 6 March. The case was filed by couple Gary Lim and Kenneth Chee, who have been together for 15 years.

    One of the plaintiff's main arguments is that the section violates Article 12 of the constitution, emphasising that all citizens are entitled to equal protection before the law. Section 377A of the Penal Code criminalises acts of "gross indecency" between two men, carrying a jail term of up to two years.

    "It is not that the courts do not have any role to play in defining moral issues when such issues are at stake. However, the courts' power to intervene can only be exercised within established principles. The issue in the present case no doubt is challenging and important, but it is not one which, in my view, justifies heavy-handed judicial intervention ahead of democratic change," said Loh.

    Loh said in court that the views that Parliament made in October 2007 regarding the law are "without a doubt controversial and disparate among various segments of the society."

    "What is clear, however, is that Parliament has decided that Section 377A should be retained. That decision is not one which is undeniably wrong," Loh explains.

    "Our courts cannot substitute their own views for that of Parliament."

    Responding to the ruling, couple Lim and Chee said in a statement, "We are disappointed that the High Court ruled against us and upheld Section 377A. Having been together for 15 years, it is disheartening that we are criminals in the eyes of the law because of a segment of society that will not live and let live, but insist on pushing their version of religion and morality on us."

    "We believe that most Singaporeans do not believe that gay people should be jailed for something they can’t change, and we believe that an equal and fair Singapore is worth striving for. We have received many supportive messages since this began, and we ask that people continue to come together as we work towards a Singapore that everyone can truly call home," the couple added.

    Lawyer Choo Zheng Xi, who represented the couple in this case, said, "Litigators are trained to be prepared for victory or defeat. While we've lost this battle and disappointment is a natural cause of that, we will take our client's instructions on whether to proceed with an appeal."
    A boyfriend should make his girlfriend's pussy wet, not her eyes. A girlfriend should make her boyfriend's cock hard, not his life .

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,232
    My Reputation Points: 947 / Power: 8

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Lim and Chee can continue to fuck each other's backsides, as they have done for 15 years. If they don't publicise it, no one will charge them.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    7,894
    My Reputation Points: 570 / Power: 5

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    What's wrong with gays? They want to start having sex out in the open? If they are doing it in the bedrooms like the rest of us, why the need to repeal?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    6,504
    My Reputation Points: 3156 / Power: 11

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    This is only the first step, they ultimately wants to be able to get married to each other.
    A boyfriend should make his girlfriend's pussy wet, not her eyes. A girlfriend should make her boyfriend's cock hard, not his life .

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    1,134
    My Reputation Points: 328 / Power: 4

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Dumb fuck retard keeps saying they are criminalized for poking backside yet they opening challenge the law and admitted they poke backside and no one is arresting them. Slapping their own mouth. Poking too much backside must have fried their brains

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    8,763
    My Reputation Points: 1362 / Power: 8

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Tuan,
    Nostrils, ears atau belly buttons ada salah tak ?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    159
    My Reputation Points: 1154 / Power: 4

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Looks like tonychat's appeal for asshole banditism got rejected.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    7,894
    My Reputation Points: 570 / Power: 5

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Next time pickpockets should repeal the law to steal from passerbys.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,499
    My Reputation Points: 610 / Power: 8

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Quote Originally Posted by BuiKia View Post
    Getty Images - Singapore's High Court upheld the controversial Section 377A law criminalising sex between two men, after a challenge by a gay couple (Getty Images)
    Singapore's High Court ruled on Friday that a law banning intercourse between men still stands, after a gay couple filed a legal challenge calling for the law to be unconstitutional.

    One of the plaintiff's main arguments is that the section violates Article 12 of the constitution, emphasizing that all citizens are entitled to equal protection before the law. Section 377A of the Penal Code criminalises acts of "gross indecency" between two men, carrying a jail term of up to two years.

    There is really nothing contradicting about 377A and article12.

    When it illegal means it illegal. There is no such thing as demanding equal right for people who broke the law.

    Now it apparent that these 2 gays had broken the law under section 377A. It time for poodle to prosecute them and send a strong message to the gay community that their action is illegal. Having a law without enforcement will only create the illusion to the gays that their action is legitimate.
    Last edited by 3_M; 10-04-2013 at 05:54 AM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    349
    My Reputation Points: 167 / Power: 3

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    laws can be broken but cannot be BENT

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    7,338
    My Reputation Points: 2242 / Power: 8

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    As long as hetrosexual anal sex is allowed its fine by me.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    395
    My Reputation Points: 7275 / Power: 16

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrooball (clone) View Post
    What's wrong with gays? They want to start having sex out in the open? If they are doing it in the bedrooms like the rest of us, why the need to repeal?
    Quote Originally Posted by BuiKia View Post
    This is only the first step, they ultimately wants to be able to get married to each other.
    I agree with you two. But we need to be careful with these very sensitive creatures they can be spiteful and merciless. For me I agree with someone who suggested beore to put all of them in an isolated island and let them fuck each other for all we care and at the same time get rid of all of them once and for all from this planet, we don't have to lynch them at the stake.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    24,878
    My Reputation Points: 4295 / Power: 17

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Fucking backside isn't just for gays, you know.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Timbuktu
    Posts
    24,103
    My Reputation Points: 2428 / Power: 13

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Quote Originally Posted by The_Hypocrite View Post
    As long as hetrosexual anal sex is allowed its fine by me.
    It is unnatural sex, the law is against is, so is 'licking the ice cream cone with cream' & licking the 'donout'..wonder why they didn't charge that NG on that??

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,618
    My Reputation Points: -16 / Power: 0

    Default I thank the Lord Gay Marriages is not going to happen in SGP!!

    TODAYonline

    377A objective 'clear', High Court dismisses challenge
    TODAYonline - ‎11 hours ago‎

    SINGAPORE - The High Court has dismissed one of two legal challenges that Section 377A (S377A) of the Penal Code - which criminalises sex between gays - is unconstitutional, ruling that its objective of criminalising a conduct that “is not acceptable in ...

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    24,878
    My Reputation Points: 4295 / Power: 17

    Default Re: I thank the Lord Gay Marriages is not going to happen in SGP!!

    377A has nothing to do with gay marriage, you retard.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    27,130
    My Reputation Points: 12745 / Power: 34

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Quote Originally Posted by BuiKia View Post
    This is only the first step, they ultimately wants to be able to get married to each other.
    After that, they will insist on being able to adopt children (including Ang Mo ones as suggested by a simple minded fellow in this forum) and later, they may even insist on being able to give birth.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,618
    My Reputation Points: -16 / Power: 0

    Default Re: I thank the Lord Gay Marriages is not going to happen in SGP!!

    Quote Originally Posted by laksaboy View Post
    377A has nothing to do with gay marriage, you retard.
    you moron! once they can this approved. they will want even more rights!
    Last edited by kongsimi; 10-04-2013 at 09:45 AM.

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    27,130
    My Reputation Points: 12745 / Power: 34

    Default Re: I thank the Lord Gay Marriages is not going to happen in SGP!!

    Quote Originally Posted by kongsimi View Post
    you moron! once they can this approved. they will want even more rights!
    you moron! once they can approve this, they will want even more rights!

    or

    you moron! once they can have this approved, they will want even more rights!

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    7,338
    My Reputation Points: 2242 / Power: 8

    Default Re: Court say cannot fuck backside...377A repeal failed

    Oral sex between heterosexual couples is legal,,change oreadi right?. Its 2 men not allowed to bang each others bum,,,that is illegal,,,anyway how can sex between heterosexual be unnatural? homosexual sex is unnatural..

    Quote Originally Posted by halsey02 View Post
    It is unnatural sex, the law is against is, so is 'licking the ice cream cone with cream' & licking the 'donout'..wonder why they didn't charge that NG on that??

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Court to decide on hearing date for Section 377A case
    By Kyo Kusanagi in forum Singapore Crime
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22-01-2013, 03:21 PM
  2. Malaysia to repeal its Sedition Act
    By TNP(Tua Neh Pau) in forum The Courtyard Café
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-07-2012, 03:08 AM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 16-10-2010, 06:26 AM
  4. Lui Fuck You: Internet failed as watchdog
    By sinren67 in forum Political Issues [no rep deductions]
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 07-02-2009, 06:23 AM
  5. Lawyers demand repeal of ISA
    By makapaaa in forum The Courtyard Café
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 27-09-2008, 09:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •