WP kowtows to terrorists

......

Parliamentary Questions filed by WP MPs - 14 January 2013
https://www.facebook.com/notes/the-...led-by-wp-mps-14-january-2013/463295883719750

*45. Mr Pritam Singh: To ask the Minister for Foreign Affairs whether Singapore's decision to abstain on the successfully passed United Nations (UN) resolution to elevate Palestine's status at the UN into a non-member observer state, increases Singapore's vulnerability to terrorists sympathetic to the Palestinian cause; and whether his Ministry will consider voting in concert with the majority of ASEAN members on Palestine-specific issues at the UN in future, so as to speak with one ASEAN voice on the matter.

Click to expand...

So, Vichy WP is damn bloody worried that Singapore’s decision on UN resolution will make the country more likely to terrorists attack.


This Vichy WP “Shadow Foreign Eunuch” is slapping the PAP regime for not taking the terrorists’ honourable view and opinion into consideration when making a decision on foreign policy.


If ever to form their “First World Government”, Vichy WP would most probably have to seek for terrorists’ advice and approval before they dare to say or do anything.


Btw, is Vichy WP saying that all those countries who have voted for the UN resolution do so because they are all sacred of terrorists as Vichy WP?.........Even though the party and their eunuchs are very Vichy, Singaporeans and everyone around the world are not Vichy.

.....

.....

This follow-up question by Vichy WP eunuch is a joke and a total disgrace:


Parliamentary Questions filed by WP MPs - 14 January 2013
https://www.facebook.com/notes/the-...led-by-wp-mps-14-january-2013/463295883719750

*46. Mr Muhamad Faisal Abdul Manap: To ask the Minister for Foreign Affairs what is Singapore's position on the Palestine Reform and Development Plan Trust Fund; and whether Singapore intends to make a contribution to this international multi-donor fund for the humanitarian development and reconstruction of Palestine.

Click to expand...

This question (question #46) comes immediately after Vichy WP eunuch has expressed his deep worry that PAP might put Singapore in great jeopardy by not taking the views of the terrorists into consideration when deciding on foreign policy(question #45).


To make Vichy WP even more Vichy, this eunuch follows up by questioning whether PAP has paid enough protection money to the Palestinian causes so that the terrorists could be pacified and would not be so deeply offended.


What would terrorists think of Singapore self-styled “First World Opposition”? Slapping the PAP for offending the terrorists is not enough, they are now slapping PAP for not paying more to the causes championed by the terrorists and sucking up to them more often and fast enough! Are they “Co-Drivers” or “Co-Terrorists”?


Even if the terrorists have no plan or intention to open any business here, they may consider Singapore a destination after witnessing how Vichy the Singapore self-styled “First World Opposition” is.

....

....

Parliamentary Question on Palestine
http://singapore2025.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/parliamentary-question-on-palestine/

While it is debatable whether a change in Singapore’s voting position would make us more secure, Singapore’s decision to abstain was in marked contrast to all other ASEAN member states, and an overwhelming number of UN member states, which voted in favour of the resolution.

Click to expand...

It is a total disgrace that this Vichy WP eunuch actually believes and admits that Singapore’s voting position may make us more vulnerable to terrorists’ attack.


Is it “debatable” that Indonesia, which has voted for the resolution, is now more secure than Singapore? How about Phillippines, is it also “debatable”? Is it “debatable” that Malaysia is now more secure than Singapore against terrorists because it voted for the UN resolution?


Is it “debateble” that these ASEAN countries are voting for the Palestinian because their leaders want to make their countries more safe from terrorists’ attack?


One thing is certainly NON-DEBATEBLE: This Vichy WP “Shadow Foreign Minister” is as Vichy as his chief eunuch. They have no balls to stand up to PAP; they have no balls to stand up to terrorists; but have a lot of fake balls to bully other genuine Opposition Parties.

....

.....

Parliamentary Question on Palestine
http://singapore2025.wordpress.com/2013/01/15/parliamentary-question-on-palestine/

This is reflective of the public interest in the issue, given that a central pillar of Singapore’s foreign policy operates within a Southeast Asian situation, which hosts a large Muslim population.

Click to expand...

Why is Vichy WP bringing up the subject of Muslim with terrorism? Is Vichy WP insinuating that Muslims are more likely to be terrorists? Why is Vichy WP so insensitive?


Is Vichy WP saying that ASEAN countries “which host a large Muslim population” are voting for the Palestinian because of their religions? Christian countries like Finland, Phillippines, Timor-Leste and France also voted yes, and now France is under terrorist threat! Buddhist countries like Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia and Thailand also voted yes. Even an atheist country like China also voted yes.


But Muslim countries like Albania and Bosnia, “which host large Muslim population”, also abstained like Singapore.


So this issue is less about Muslim religion but more about geopolitical issue.


Vichy WP should not play with religion for its political objective and insult the pride of every Muslim by linking them to terrorism.

....