• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Justice Choo Han Teck is a fair man

wendypoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/Breaking+News/Courts+and+Crime/Story/STIStory_268028.html

Rape charge reduced for man

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Selina Lum
</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --><TR vAlign=bottom><TD width=330>
FRONT_just.jpg

</TD><TD width=10>
c.gif
</TD><TD vAlign=bottom>
c.gif

In clearing the man of rape, Justice Choo Han Teck (left) pointed to the inconsistent testimony of the girl, as well as that of three passers-by who detained the accused and called the police. -- ALPHONSO CHAN/THE STRAITS TIMES FILE
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>



A 47-YEAR-OLD man accused of raping a mentally retarded teenage girl in broad daylight has been acquitted after a High Court trial, and instead, was convicted on a lesser charge of having sex with a minor.

In clearing the man of rape, Justice Choo Han Teck pointed to the inconsistent testimony of the girl, as well as that of three passers-by who detained the accused and called the police.

Despite the inconsistencies, the judge was satisfied that the prosecution has proved its case - that the man had sexual intercourse with the teen.

'Rape, howevever, is committed only when there was an absence of consent,' Justice Choo said in his written judgment. 'Consent is a positive act of the will, which in turn, implies consciousness.'

He said it is possible that a girl with a low IQ may not have the requisite will to give consent.

However, there was not enough evidence to persuade the judge to infer that she was incapable of giving such consent.

The accused, who would have faced up to 20 years' jail and caning if convicted of rape, is now looking at up to five years' jail and a fine of up to $10,000.

He has been remanded and is expected to be sentenced on Aug19.
 

Frankiestine

Alfrescian
Loyal
The gal is a retard, how can one expect her to understand this things and give her consent to having sex....she probably doesn't even know what is happening...amazing that the judge based his judgment partially on the gal testimony...what consistency can you expect from one with a low IQ...
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
The gal is a retard, how can one expect her to understand this things and give her consent to having sex....she probably doesn't even know what is happening...amazing that the judge based his judgment partially on the gal testimony...what consistency can you expect from one with a low IQ...


Let's be fair to both the accused and the way justice can be tempered by the very notion of how far a HIgh Court judge can correctly assess the 'level of retardness' ( is there such a word?..retardness):biggrin: of the girl.

A difficult process to determine correctly, at that point of time the very offence was committed, whether the girl did give some kind of consent.

The prosecution has to prove without a doubt that the girl was indeed completely misled or forcefully made to have intercourse with the man.

Another very difficult process again.

Given all the possible outcomes and with the balance of probabilities, Judge Choo would have to give the defence a level of doubt and not punish him on the ultimate charge the AG was pushing for.:wink:
 

Frankiestine

Alfrescian
Loyal
I always thought that the kangaroo cock system is that the accuse, is guilty until proven innocent....but in this case it is innocence until proven guilty...the united shit system..
 

soIsee

Alfrescian
Loyal
I always thought that the kangaroo cock system is that the accuse, is guilty until proven innocent....but in this case it is innocence until proven guilty...the united shit system..

The kangaroo only start to hop around when the case is poltically sensitive or politically related.

Or else most of the time it hibernates:biggrin:
 

prdsingh

Alfrescian
Loyal
sick sick justice.

A retard cant possibly give consent. Even if given, it is not out of conscious free will.

An eight yr old girl can give you consent to have sex with her, but its still rape
 

cass888

Alfrescian
Loyal
http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/Breaking%2BNews/Courts%2Band%2BCrime/Story/STIStory_268028.html

Rape charge reduced for man

<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class="padlrt8 georgia11 darkgrey bold" colSpan=2>By Selina Lum


</TD></TR><!-- show image if available --><TR vAlign=bottom><TD width=330>
FRONT_just.jpg



</TD><TD width=10>
c.gif
</TD><TD vAlign=bottom>
c.gif

In clearing the man of rape, Justice Choo Han Teck (left) pointed to the inconsistent testimony of the girl, as well as that of three passers-by who detained the accused and called the police. -- ALPHONSO CHAN/THE STRAITS TIMES FILE


</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>



A 47-YEAR-OLD man accused of raping a mentally retarded teenage girl in broad daylight has been acquitted after a High Court trial, and instead, was convicted on a lesser charge of having sex with a minor.

In clearing the man of rape, Justice Choo Han Teck pointed to the inconsistent testimony of the girl, as well as that of three passers-by who detained the accused and called the police.

Despite the inconsistencies, the judge was satisfied that the prosecution has proved its case - that the man had sexual intercourse with the teen.

'Rape, howevever, is committed only when there was an absence of consent,' Justice Choo said in his written judgment. 'Consent is a positive act of the will, which in turn, implies consciousness.'

He said it is possible that a girl with a low IQ may not have the requisite will to give consent.

However, there was not enough evidence to persuade the judge to infer that she was incapable of giving such consent.

The accused, who would have faced up to 20 years' jail and caning if convicted of rape, is now looking at up to five years' jail and a fine of up to $10,000.

He has been remanded and is expected to be sentenced on Aug19.

Fair? He should have given that beast 24 strokes of the cane.
 

ranger_edd

Alfrescian
Loyal
The physical act of rape is made up of:-

1. Sexual intercourse
2. Without consent

For the accused to be guilty of rape, the two elements of mens rea and actus reus must be present. Mens rea would be the intention to rape while actus reus, the physical act of rape (above).

The prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt the "without consent" part. Ah well.
 

japarmy

Alfrescian
Loyal
Choo Han Teck failed to enforce any orders in a divorce, and neglected to award child support. I think he was bribed.

bcchoohanteck.jpg


From Escape from Paradise:

Choo Han Teck had received a great deal of notoriety in the Singapore press over a case involving oral sex. The Straits Times published an article under the byline, 'Did you know . . . That oral sex, even between consenting adults, is an offense'


The article cited the recent case of a twenty-six year old man, not Chinese, of course, who was jailed for six months and fined S$2,000 by Choo Han Teck for being on the receiving end, so to speak, of a blowjob.”
 

scroobal

Alfrescian
Loyal
Gosh, you ended up with the wrong woman and we end up getting spammed on the same issues. Give it a rest. The first few times we showed concerned, then it became a chore and then a nuisance.

Nobody likes the regime, or the families associated with it.

At least post something new. Any new dirt unconvered of the PAP that has nothing to do with your wife or the book that you are flogging?

Choo Han Teck failed to enforce any orders in a divorce, and neglected to award child support. I think he was bribed.
 

scoobyhoo

Alfrescian
Loyal
even betwen husband and wife, oral sex is a criminal offence. i had once told my friend that i had sex with my wife for more than half an hour. my friend told me that this is a criminal offence for having sex with longer time?! no wonder we need lawyers! laws are not clear to layman like us. and one could be prosecuted for the act even from common sense, this should not be illegal.
 
Top