Amy Cheong 'Could Face Charges'

[Kinana]

Tell that to CSJ who uttered 'where's the money?'

Sinkie really need to wake the fuck up before they turned into zombies! LOL

CSJ's charge was baseless and targeted towards an individual, in fact an outright lie. He deserved what he got.

[soIsee]

CSJ's charge was baseless and targeted towards an individual, in fact an outright lie. He deserved what he got.

And telling the truth about some idiots making a hellava noise , gets Amy the sack

Boy, you had better wake up.

So both truth and lies( which you supposed it was ) gets you the stick.

So who is eating the carrot? LOL

[Seee3]

Malay weddings are cheaper but Chinese weddings have a better ROI.

Oh I see. So it is economics after all.

[Jah_rastafar_I]

Singapore.. a country where telling the truth is a criminal act.

Attachment 6915

Sam how come no one has called you a racist yet is it cos of you being the forum owner?

[0939]

Unless she can prove that cheaper wedding leads to high divorce, she is still liable.

Liable for what? She showed her frustrations over the Malay wedding. She used the word "FCUK" is not a vulgar word.

[mojito]

Malay weddings are cheaper but Chinese weddings have a better ROI.

Apparently Ang Paos for wedding dinners tend to be upwards of $80, so if some Chinese hold their wedding in cheap hotels and restaurants, they actually make money. I know at least one person who admitted this sheepishly to me.

[blur sotong]

And being in Aussieland, she would have judicial avenues to delay, stop that from happening. Do you think the MIWs will cause a big ruckus for something this "small". I'll say in 6 months time no one would even remember the incident in Singapore.

Wrong bro, in 6 months time, at least two people will still remember - Amy and that dog.

[blur sotong]

Sam how come no one has called you a racist yet is it cos of you being the forum owner?

Bro Jah, can you please moderate him when he post at the Moderated Section??

[blur sotong]

CSJ's charge was baseless and targeted towards an individual, in fact an outright lie. He deserved what he got.

Are you sure? Then why there are so much ranting at those coffee shop talk during those time?

Please show proof to support your claim.

[zhihau]

"FCUK" is not a vulgar word.

isn't FCUK French Connection UK?

frenchconnection.com

[TracyTan866]

i see no case against Amy

[Frankiestine]

Malay weddings are cheaper but Chinese weddings have a better ROI.

Depends on how you see it, if the marriage doesn't work out its only 50 bucks lost but for chinese that tens and thousands down the drain...

[mojito]

i see no case against Amy

There was a seedy act passed on parliament many moons ago.

[Fook Seng]

And being in Aussieland, she would have judicial avenues to delay, stop that from happening. Do you think the MIWs will cause a big ruckus for something this "small". I'll say in 6 months time no one would even remember the incident in Singapore.

Not to say the MIW deliberately signed this agreement with Ossieland because of Amy. But the agreement is really bad timing for Amy.

[Mdm Tang]

i see no case against Amy

.


very little is known about Amy Cheong.

The Press didnt even know her full name !!!

Even her marital status is unknown !!!

is she a single mum ???

no one know ???


i worry

[Fook Seng]

isn't FCUK French Connection UK?

frenchconnection.com

No wonder it looks neither French not English.

[Fook Seng]

The whole thing looks odd, even comical, a lesson of what not to do.

First there was a lot of noise asking for the NTUC to sack Amy, so they sacked Amy. And several ministers came out to condemn her FB comment.

Then somebody followed up with a police report asking to charge her. We are still waiting for the action from the AG. But now cyberspace is loudly condemning such a possible action.

If the Govt were to play to the gallery and follow their usual SOP by putting the whole cabinet and their parliamentarians in full support of their action, wouldn't it look like they had been played first one way then the other way by the crowd. What would our "leaders" do?

If they take a hard line approach with Amy now against public opinion just to show their independence, it will create a cyber commotion never seen before, something they started off trying to prevent. The PAP surely has to review its SOP of "enemy in front, charge" approach in dealing with public opinion.

[Fook Seng]

There was a seedy act passed on parliament many moons ago.

What was the Act?

[Jah_rastafar_I]

i see no case against Amy

I respect your opinion in this matter and you are entitled to your opinion without somehow being harrassed and condemned for it. Some forummer that used to post in the old forum by the nick of ptader even came out to flame you simply because you held an opinion different from his and he was cursing you as if you had murdered his family members. Such tyranny should be not be condoned

[yaosiu]

CSJ's charge was baseless and targeted towards an individual, in fact an outright lie. He deserved what he got.

Nah! A question should not be label as a insinuation.