• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

If PAPpies win Hougang Tonight,.....

babuSingh

Alfrescian
Loyal
What difference will it make if WP or PAP win? Does that mean less foreign workers issues, less inflation growth? NO
 

Zatoichi

Alfrescian
Loyal
come 2016. we can see GRCs fall one by one.
Haha, this is one way for them to fall and the entire Cabinet of Ministers to be made up of Opposition MPs:

"Here's how the PAP could have LOST the 2011 GE, and possibly lose the 2016 GE too!"
http://www.sammyboy.com/showthread.php?118599

Just for the sake of fantasy, if all those 49,851 voters who voted against the PAP in Ang Mo Kio GRC, and all those 54,601 voters who voted against the PAP in Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC (Teo Chee Hean's GRC), both of which are the only GRCs with more than 100,000 PAP voters each:

http://www.ge.sg/results/grc/

had been living in the following 9 GRCs (43 seats) instead, which had its opposition parties win at least 35% of the votes per GRC at last year's GE:

Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC (47,205 votes; 43.07%)
Chua Chu Kang GRC (56,885 votes; 38.80%)
East Coast GRC (49,429 votes; 45.17%)
Holland-Bukit Timah GRC (32,406 votes; 39.92%)
Marine Parade GRC (59,926 votes; 43.36%)
Moulmein-Kallang GRC (31,773 votes; 41.45%)
Nee Soon GRC (57,523 votes; 41.60%)
Sembawang GRC (47,605 votes; 36.10%)
Tampines GRC (54,381 votes; 42.78%)

the PAP could have LOST the 2011 GE, and possibly lose the 2016 GE too!

The reason, as many of you might have guessed by now, is very simple:

In order for the opposition party in Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC to win 51% of the votes at last year's GE, it needed:
47,205 / 43.07 X 51 = 55,896 (or 55,896 - 47,205 = 8,691 MORE) votes

In order for the opposition party in Chua Chu Kang GRC to win 51% of the votes at last year's GE, it needed:
56,885 / 38.8 X 51 = 74,772 (or 74,772 - 56,885 = 17,887 MORE) votes

In order for the opposition party in East Coast GRC to win 51% of the votes at last year's GE, it needed:
49,429 / 45.17 X 51 = 55,809 (or 55,809 - 49,429 = 6,380 MORE) votes

In order for the opposition party in Holland-Bukit Timah GRC to win 51% of the votes at last year's GE, it needed:
32,406 / 39.92 X 51 = 41,400 (or 41,400 - 32,406 = 8,994 MORE) votes

In order for the opposition party in Marine Parade GRC to win 51% of the votes at last year's GE, it needed:
59,926 / 43.36 X 51 = 70,485 (or 70,485 - 59,926 = 10,559 MORE) votes

In order for the opposition party in Moulmein-Kallang GRC to win 51% of the votes at last year's GE, it needed:
31,773 / 41.45 X 51 = 39,093 (or 39,093 - 31,773 = 7,320 MORE) votes

In order for the opposition party in Nee Soon GRC to win 51% of the votes at last year's GE, it needed:
57,523 / 41.60 X 51 = 70,521 (or 70,521 - 57,523 = 12,998 MORE) votes

In order for the opposition party in Sembawang GRC to win 51% of the votes at last year's GE, it needed:
47,605 / 36.1 X 51 = 67,254 (or 67,254 - 47,605 = 19,649 MORE) votes

In order for the opposition party in Tampines GRC to win 51% of the votes at last year's GE, it needed:
54,381 / 42.78 X 51 = 64,830 (or 64,830 - 54,381 = 10,449 MORE) votes

Total ADDITIONAL votes needed by the opposition parties in those 9 GRCs
= 8,691 + 17,887 + 6,380 + 8,994 + 10,559 + 7,320 + 12,998 + 19,649 + 10,449
= 102,927 votes

Total OPPOSITION votes in Lee Hsien Loong's Ang Mo Kio GRC and Teo Chee Hean's Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC (just 2 GRCs)
= 49,851 + 54,601
= 104,452

So as you all can see, the total opposition votes in those 2 pro-PAP GRCs, which are also the most pro-PAP GRCs (in terms of number of votes, i.e. the only 2 GRCs with more than 100,000 PAP voters each), would have been more than enough for the PAP to have LOST last year's GE if all those 104,452 voters had been living in those 9 GRCs which had at least 35% of the votes per GRC going to the Opposition; that's a total of 43 seats from those 9 GRCs alone!

Plus Hougang's 1 seat and Aljunied's 5 seats, that's a total of 49 (or 49 / 87 = 56.3% of the) Parliamentary seats for the Opposition, who would then be able to form a Coalition government (or Cabinet of Ministers) with ZERO PAP MPs!
 

PAPIBCHIEF

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
THERE Sseems to be a BIG mistake in the title of this thread...IT should be PAP WILL WIN HOUGANG TONIGHT!!!
 

akunei

Alfrescian
Loyal
whatever the outcome, i hope that u can stop all your vulgarities and become a better person so as to contribute to society and bring world peace to all sentient beings and attain enlightmement.
 

I_Hate_Pappies

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
whatever the outcome, i hope that u can stop all your vulgarities and become a better person so as to contribute to society and bring world peace to all sentient beings and attain enlightmement.

Good people don't live long. I need to have something bad to keep my life longer. To either live to see the downfall of PAP or PAP waking up their fucking ideas.
 

Fook Seng

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Clone said:
Got anyone pledged to chop if PAP lost? :confused:

They are not like you, OK? Otherwise you will see a lot of rotting flesh lying all around. Maybe between DPM and Desmond, there could be a bet. Who knows?
 
Last edited:

laksaboy

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
What difference will it make if WP or PAP win? Does that mean less foreign workers issues, less inflation growth? NO

It doesn't matter who wins. If you want real change, PAP must lose and lose big.

Imagine if there is only one telco, or only one hawker stall selling the food you like.

Do you honestly think the price and product/service quality will be satisfactory?

Of course not! It's definitely a 'screw you take it or leave it' attitude with maximum exploitation and market inefficiency.
It's called a 'monopoly'.

Why don't people understand that what's true for business is also true for politics?
It's such a simple, universal truth, and yet people still struggle to comprehend it.
 
Top