Search results

Sad state. ATB cook mee rebus. Cham.

Old video of a young @syed putra :geek:

The return of the prodigal son.

ACJC

Sounds like some mysterious poison from Heaven Sword and Dragon Sabre.

Poster boy for antivax?

ACJC is a good JC located at high SES Dover Close.

KNN, next month $500 CDC voucher leh.

Was the driver driving a renewed COE car?

Not longer ago, an AMDK also triggered @Balls2U at Starbucks.

Looks like Japanese building. A lot of Sinkie men look like him. Cham .... Sinkie men not charming.

The “several others” were identified by name along with their affiliated organizations and were mentioned in the article alongside the two Ministers. You are correct that Singapore’s defamation law is generally more favorable to plaintiffs, emphasizing the protection of reputation, whereas...

It is clear that Bloomberg’s lawyers have no intention of suggesting that the Minister is aware of the beneficial owner under the trust (UBO). On the contrary, Bloomberg’s lawyers appear content to have obtained an admission from the Minister that he is not aware of the UBO, as such an admission...

You can form a tag team with @Sustanon

It's a false innuendo, and the Court will construe the meaning based on the entire article. It's perfectly legal. Bloomberg's defense is beside the point if you are not referring to the outcome of the trial. The public opinion, if it can be collated, will only strengthen the Minister's case.

But Bloomberg's defense is NOT that they have reasonable grounds to suspect the Minister of money laundering or that the higher than usual purchase price was paid in return of a favor. In fact, if that were Bloomberg's defense, it would directly prove the Minister's case.

CECA no such thing. You raped her, must marry you.

Despite the evidence? What evidence has been produced by Bloomberg lawyer to prove that the article is not defamatory?

If lieutenant is chio, pumping position down.

I see you at Gaysorn Plaza later.