• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Are fintech and online businesses better businesses?

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Quote: "Still, analysts have been slow to cut target prices given the two companies’ status as market leaders in Southeast Asia. They expect a return of at least 68% on both stocks over the next 12 months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg."

What are the analysts smoking!!??

A $96.3 bil plunge in the share prices of Grab and Sea Limited casts doubt on Singapore's new economy aura​


Bloomberg
Mon, Apr 04, 2022

A $96.3 bil plunge in the share prices of Grab and Sea Limited casts doubt on Singapore's new economy aura

Photo: Bloomberg

Singapore’s two largest new-economy firms have been touted as the next big thing for years. A US$71 billion ($96.3 billion) rout in their share prices in 2022 seems to show investors aren’t buying the story.
Shares of ride-hailing company Grab Holdings Ltd. have more than halved since the start of the year while gaming and e-commerce giant Sea Ltd.’s stock price has tumbled by 46%. The two US-listed firms are languishing at the bottom of the MSCI Asean Index, with Grab among the biggest losers on the Asia Pacific stock benchmark as well.
The slump comes months after MSCI Inc. added the shares to its indexes amid much fanfare as it sought to give its regional gauges more exposure to new economy stocks. The tech selloff and waning global interest in special purpose acquisition companies have taken a toll on the firms.

“Passive investors would have lost a fair bit of money on these stocks,” said Brian Freitas, an analyst who publishes research on independent research website Smartkarma. Future price action “depends on how the companies perform and the global macro environment -- neither of which look terribly encouraging at the moment.”
image


Grab was added to the MSCI Asean Index in February, hot on the heels of its merger with blank-check company Altimeter Growth Corp. Sea’s inclusion in the gauge began in May last year.
Freitas estimates that passive holdings of Sea and Grab are close to US$2.8 billion and US$280 million, respectively. The stocks have lost a combined US$71 billion in market value this year.
Judging by the earnings outlook, there may be little respite in store. Sea, which counts Chinese social media leader Tencent Holdings Ltd. as its biggest shareholder, is betting on growth at its online retail unit Shopee as its gaming arm faces slower bookings. But, Sea shut its main e-commerce operation in India on March 29, soon after the country banned its marquee flagship game Free Fire along with dozens of apps it says are of Chinese origin, citing security concerns.

“Shopee’s growth trajectory is flattening rapidly alongside India and France exits,” said Oshadhi Kumarasiri, an equity analyst with LightStream Research. “For a company priced expensively based on its future growth, it’s difficult to brush off the impact of an exit from a huge market like India. The growth story of Sea is falling apart.”

Meanwhile, Grab’s losses are mounting and the firm continues to splurge on subsidies.

Still, analysts have been slow to cut target prices given the two companies’ status as market leaders in Southeast Asia. They expect a return of at least 68% on both stocks over the next 12 months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Temasek-backed Zilingo’s CEO suspended pending investigation, board confirms​

md_zilingo_13042022.jpg



CEO Ankiti Bose has disputed allegations of wrongdoing. PHOTO: ZILINGO
chooyunting.png




Choo Yun Ting
Business Correspondent

Apr 13, 2022

SINGAPORE - Temasek-backed e-commerce start-up Zilingo has suspended its chief executive Ankiti Bose pending an investigation.
In a media statement on Wednesday (April 13), the Zilingo board said the major investors of the company had authorised it to suspend Ms Bose while an investigation is conducted into matters that surfaced in March.
The statement did not mention what the matters of concern are.
“In March 2022, shareholders of Zilingo and members of the board received information which required investigation. The major investors of the company authorised the board to put the CEO, Ankiti Bose, on suspension pending an investigation of the matters raised,” the statement said.
Bloomberg had earlier reported that Ms Bose was suspended after new funding efforts led to questions about the company’s accounting.
The concerns centred on the way that Singapore-headquartered Zilingo had accounted for transactions and revenue across a platform spanning thousands of small merchants, according to Bloomberg’s sources.
Zilingo had been trying to raise US$150 million (S$205 million) to US$200 million with help from Goldman Sachs Group, and the funding round was expected to lift its valuation above US$1 billion.

Besides Singapore state investment firm Temasek, Zilingo also counts venture capital firms Sequoia Capital and Burda Principal, as well as Singapore's Economic Development Board’s investment arm EDBI, among its investors.
The Zilingo board said the company’s major investors have hired an independent firm to investigate the matter, and Zilingo is working closely with the investors and the independent firm for the probe.

“Proper due process has been and will be followed. The board is committed to protecting the interests of all stakeholders in a just manner while fulfilling its fiduciary obligations,” it added.
“Apart from the above, the specific details of these investigations – and the affairs of the company – are strictly confidential.”

Temasek declined to comment when contacted.
Bloomberg reported that Ms Bose has disputed allegations of wrongdoing and contends her suspension was due in part to her complaints about harassment.She has also called the investigation a “witch hunt”, the news agency reported.
The Straits Times has contacted Ms Bose’s lawyer for more information.
Regulatory checks show that Zilingo’s last financial statement was filed in March 2019.
The start-up, which provides technology solutions to support the fashion supply chain, was set up by Ms Bose and co-founder Dhruv Kapoor in 2015.
nf-ankiti-130422.jpg



The suspension of Zilingo CEO Ankiti Bose, seen here in 2017, is scheduled to run until May 5. PHOTO: BT FILE
Commenting on the suspension, National University of Singapore Business School Professor Mak Yuen Teen noted that it is normal for investors to require due diligence when a start-up looks to raise more funds.
There have been situations, such as for co-working firm WeWork, where such due diligence has uncovered issues with accounting and other matters, such as conflict of interest, he added.
“As start-ups are often valued based on revenue or gross merchandise value (GMV), rather than profits, how revenues or GMV are computed is clearly an area of significant risk from an accounting and reporting standpoint,” Prof Mak explained.
He said the board does have the power to order an investigation and to put the CEO on leave or suspend the executive in such situations, but there has to be due process and natural justice, which includes fairness to the accused party.
“It is generally not appropriate for the CEO to still be running the business during the period of the investigation. It is not an easy situation to handle,” Prof Mak added.

The company made an aggressive pitch in its latest effort to raise fresh capital. Late last year, it forecast that core net revenue would rise from about US$40 million in fiscal 2021 to roughly US$60 million in fiscal 2022 and US$100 million the year after, according to presentation documents reviewed by Bloomberg News.
Zilingo said it anticipated breaking even on core Ebitda - or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation - in fiscal 2023 and then reaching almost US$200 million in fiscal 2026.
On March 31, Ms Bose was called to a meeting with three board members and told about "serious" complaints about discrepancies in accounts and mismanagement, according to the correspondence reviewed by Bloomberg.
She was later questioned by two people from Kroll, the investigations firm.
Her suspension is scheduled to run until May 5.
Ms Bose, through her lawyer, has argued that the directors did not follow proper procedures during the process and questioned their right to suspend her, according to the correspondence from her attorney to Zilingo.
"We are of the view that our client's suspension has been procured by invalid and defective means; that the investigation commenced into her is unfair and lacking in due process; and that she has been suspended without proper and reasonable cause," her attorney wrote.

About Zilingo’s Ankiti Bose

Zilingo’s suspended chief executive Ankiti Bose co-founded the Singapore-based e-commerce start-up with Mr Dhruv Kapoor in 2015, when she was just 23.
The Indian national, who is a Singapore permanent resident, was inspired to set up the technology platform after visiting Thailand’s Chatuchak weekend market several years ago.
The visit seeded the idea for the start-up, which initially sought to provide an avenue for small business owners to market their products online.
It has since broadened its focus across the fashion supply chain, providing procurement, distribution and trade services as well.
Before setting up Zilingo, Ms Bose was an investment analyst at venture capital firm Sequoia Capital in India, where she was immersed in Asia’s fast-growing tech scene.
Her achievements as a young female entrepreneur have been widely celebrated, and she has spoken in media interviews about inspiring other young women to start their own businesses and chase their dreams.
Ms Bose and Mr Kapoor were named on Forbes 30 Under 30 Asia in 2018, and she was featured in the Singapore 100 Women in Tech List in 2020.
She has also been a speaker at several global and regional conferences, including the Bloomberg New Economy Forum in Singapore last year (2021).
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

SPAC listing in US on the cards for S'pore digital healthcare platform EUDA​

mi_pill_180422.jpg


EUDA serves a wide variety of healthcare needs including wellness and prevention as well as pre-existing conditions. PHOTO: KENTRIDGEHEALTH.COM
ven.png



Ven Sreenivasan
Associate Editor

Apr 18, 2022

SINGAPORE - Singapore-based special purpose acquisition company (Spac) 8i Acquisition 2 Corp is planning a business combination with home-grown digital healthcare platform EUDA Health.
EUDA, founded by Singapore doctor Kelvin Chen in 2017, uses its proprietary artificial intelligence-driven healthcare analytics platform to digitally connect patients, insurers, and medical professionals to optimise patient care.
The company serves a wide variety of healthcare needs, including wellness and prevention, urgent care and emergencies, as well as pre-existing conditions.
8i Acquisition Corp chief executive James Tan said his stock purchase agreement with EUDA, followed by a planned Nasdaq listing in the United States, would put the healthcare company on a much stronger financial footing for future growth.
"Through its differentiated AI platform and commitment to providing the highest level of patient outcomes, EUDA Health has attracted the partnerships of internationally recognised blue-chip organisations," he added.
"In a short period, the management team has built a truly unique platform and gained a meaningful foothold into the Asia Pacific region."
The pro forma enterprise value of the combined company is expected to be approximately US$580 million (S$790 million) with cash on hand of approximately US$90 million, assuming no redemptions are made.

Since its founding in 2019, EUDA Health has grown steadily and is targeting to operate across five countries - Singapore, Malaysia, Vietnam, India and Indonesia - by the end of 2022.
Dr Chen, who is founder and CEO, said that the company aims to make healthcare more affordable and accessible, while improving the patient experience and outcomes through personalised healthcare.
"Our platform creates an ecosystem that accomplishes this through comprehensive, end-to-end care. We have assembled a team of experts from every corner of the industry who are passionate about transforming how patients are cared for."
He added that EUDA's artificial intelligence-enabled healthcare platform streamlines the entire patient journey from registration to treatment to ongoing care by breaking down silos between different healthcare providers, aligning all patient information, personalising and improving patient outcomes and experience.
The result helps generate up to 40 per cent cost savings for patients on average.

To support this, the company has built an ecosystem of more than 250,000 medical professionals across Asia and has amassed over 35 million members and 5,000 corporate clients across seven countries in three years.
Proceeds from the trust account (assuming no redemptions) are expected to be used for product development and other artificial intelligence technology research, business expansion and potential strategic investment and acquisition opportunities.
In 2023, EUDA is expected to generate an estimated revenue and adjusted Ebitda (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation) of US$200 million and US$43 million respectively.
Upon the conclusion of the transaction, the listed entity - now known as 8i Acquisition 2 Corp - will be renamed EUDA Health Limited under a new ticker symbol "EUDA" on the Nasdaq.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

One-time richest Singapore tycoon has lost 80% of his fortune​


Forrest Li, chairman and group chief executive officer of Sea Ltd., loses US$17 billion in one of tech's biggest wipeouts. (PHOTO: Bloomberg)

Forrest Li, chairman and group chief executive officer of Sea Ltd., loses US$17 billion in one of tech's biggest wipeouts. (PHOTO: Bloomberg)
By Yoojung Lee and Yoolim Lee

(Bloomberg) — Just a few months ago, Forrest Li had a US$22 billion fortune and was the richest person in Singapore. Now he’s emerging as one of the biggest losers from a market crash that’s wiped more than US$1 trillion from the net worth of the world’s 500 richest people this year.
It’s been a litany of unfortunate events for the Sea Ltd. founder: The tech selloff, the shutdown of its main e-commerce operation in India and disappointing earnings have tanked the company’s American depository receipts more than 80% from a peak in October. He’s still rich — worth US$4.7 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index — but no longer enough to make the cutoff for the top 500 on the planet.
Traders are preparing for more bad news. The company, which is scheduled to report first-quarter earnings later Tuesday, is expected to post a record loss of more than US$740 million, according to the average analyst estimate compiled by Bloomberg. Sea’s net loss had already widened in the final three months of last year as the firm sped up its expansion.
The downfall showcases the vulnerability of the quick wealth creation from the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic — when tech giants benefited from greater demand for their services such as Sea’s e-commerce and gaming. Higher interest rates and the tensions surrounding the war in Ukraine are further hurting growth stocks.
“Sea is going to see increasing challenges in 2022,” said Shawn Yang, managing director at Blue Lotus Capital, an independent equity research firm in Hong Kong that cut the stock’s target price to US$105 from US$180 on May 10.
The company’s e-commerce sales, its main source of revenue, could come short of its annual guidance of US$8.9 billion to US$9.1 billion as it faces intensifying competition from rivals including Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and as consumers return to offline stores with the easing of Covid restrictions, Yang said.
A Sea representative declined to comment for this story.
Beyond Li, many tech entrepreneurs who saw their wealth rise on the back of the pandemic-induced growth are being hit hard by the market selloff. Eric Yuan, chief executive officer of Zoom Video Communications Inc., has lost US$4.4 billion of wealth this year, while the fortune of Amazon.com Inc.’s Jeff Bezos, the world’s second-richest person, is down almost US$58 billion. Ernie Garcia II and Ernie Garcia III, the father-son duo that runs used-car company Carvana Co., have shed US$15 billion combined.
Sea’s valuation collapse prompted the usually low-profile Li to reach out to his employees in March. In a 900-word internal memo, he told them not to fear and that while the drop is painful, “this is short-term pain that we have to endure to truly maximise our long-term potential.”
(Source: Bloomberg)

(Source: Bloomberg)
Analysts generally remain optimistic about Sea’s future even though the stock fell to a two-year low earlier this month. Of the 38 analysts tracked by Bloomberg covering it, 34 recommend buying it. The company’s valuation may begin to rebound as prospects improve with its geographical expansion, according to Nathan Naidu, an analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence.
For now, though, the shares remain volatile. After a 32% rebound amid a tech rally in the last two days of last week, they dropped 6.7% Monday. Gang Ye, one of the other company founders, has lost US$4.3 billion in wealth this year, while David Chen is no longer a billionaire.
“In the current economic environment, the level of anxiety about the effects of anticipated rate hikes by the Fed, along with rising inflation and impact from the Russian invasion of Ukraine just aren’t good for risky assets such as tech stocks,” BI’s Naidu said.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

SEA quarterly loss widens after consumers cool online spending​

ads-sealtd-17052022.jpg

Sea's net loss in the first three months widened to US$579.8 million from US$422.7 million a year earlier. PHOTO: REUTERS

May 17, 2022

NEW YORK (BLOOMBERG) - Singapore's Sea Ltd. posted a wider quarterly loss as its revenue growth slowed, underscoring how online gaming and shopping are retreating from pandemic-era heights.
Its net loss in the first three months widened to US$579.8 million from US$422.7 million a year earlier, according to a statement Tuesday. Total revenue climbed 64 per cent to US$2.9 billion, the slowest pace of growth in more than four years.
Sea revised its full-year outlook for e-commerce sales, its main source of revenue, to US$8.5 billion to US$9.1 billion from its previous guidance of US$8.9 billion to US$9.1 billion. The company said in March it expects its gaming arm Garena to post US$2.9 billion to US$3.1 billion in bookings in 2022, set to be its first decline ever.
The results showcase how consumers emerging from prolonged lockdowns are cutting back on online entertainment and purchases, especially with the war in Ukraine and rising interest rates clouding the global economic outlook.
The pandemic triggered a rally in online shopping and gaming shares as consumers spent more time and money online, helping Sea's become Southeast Asia's most valuable company.
But the broader tech selloff, the shutdown of its e-commerce operation in India and disappointing earnings have wiped 81 per cent off its value since a peak in October.
Shares of Sea declined 6.7 per cent in New York on Monday.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Netflix subscribers fall for first time in a decade, may offer cheaper plans with ads​

md_netflix_20042022.jpg

The company blamed inflation, the conflict in Ukraine and fierce competition for its losses. PHOTO: AFP

APR 20, 2022

LOS ANGELES (REUTERS) - Netflix said inflation, the war in Ukraine and fierce competition contributed to a loss of subscribers for the first time in more than a decade and predicted more contraction ahead, marking an abrupt shift in fortune for a streaming company that thrived during the pandemic.
Netflix's 26 per cent tumble after the bell on Tuesday (April 19) erased about US$40 billion (S$54.7 billion) of its stock market value. Since it warned in January of weak subscriber growth, the company has lost nearly half of its value.
The lagging subscriber growth prompted Netflix for the first time to say it might offer a lower-priced version of the service with advertising.
The company said it lost 200,000 subscribers in its first quarter, instead of adding the 2.5 million subscribers it had forecast.
Suspending service in Russia after the Ukraine invasion resulted in the loss of 700,000 members.
The headwinds facing Netflix pummelled other video streaming-related stocks, with Roku dropping more than 6 per cent, Walt Disney falling 5 per cent and Warner Bros Discovery down 3.5 per cent.
Netflix, which currently has 221.6 million subscribers, last reported losing customers in October 2011.

The company offered a gloomy prediction for the spring quarter, forecasting it would lose two million subscribers, despite the return of such hotly anticipated series as Stranger Things and Ozark and the debut of the film The Grey Man, starring Chris Evans and Ryan Gosling. Wall Street targeted 227 million for the second quarter, according to Refinitiv data.
In addition to advertising-supported plans, the company is also looking to generate additional revenue from customers who share their account with friends or family outside their home.
"Those who have followed Netflix know that I've been against the complexity of advertising, and a big fan of the simplicity of subscription," said chief executive Reed Hastings. "But, as much as I'm a fan of that, I'm a bigger fan of consumer choice."
Mr Hastings said "it's pretty clear" that ad-supported services are working for Disney and HBO.

Confluence of events​

Netflix's first-quarter revenue grew 10 per cent to US$7.87 billion, slightly below Wall Street's forecasts. It reported per-share net earnings of US$3.53, beating the Wall Street consensus of US$2.89.
"The large number of households sharing accounts - combined with competition, is creating revenue growth headwinds. The big Covid-19 boost to streaming obscured the picture until recently," Netflix said, explaining the difficulties of signing up new customers.
In addition to the paying households, Netflix is being watched by an additional 100 million households that it said were sharing accounts, including 30 million in the United States and Canada. As penetration has increased, the number of shared accounts has become a bigger problem.

This confluence of events caught Wall Street by surprise.
"They suffered from a combination of approaching saturation, inflation, higher pricing, the war in Ukraine and competition," said Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter. "I don't think any of us expected that all to happen at once."
The world's dominant streaming service was expected to report slowing growth, amid intense competition from established rivals like Amazon.com, traditional media companies such as the Walt Disney and the newly formed Warner Bros Discovery and cash-flush newcomers like Apple.
Streaming services spent US$50 billion on new content last year, in a bid to attract or retain subscribers, according to researcher Ampere Analysis.
That is a 50 per cent increase from 2019, when many of the newer streaming services launched, signalling the quick escalation of the so-called "streaming wars".
Netflix noted that despite the intensifying competition, its share of TV viewing in the US has held steady according to Nielsen, a mark of subscriber satisfaction and retention.
"We want to grow that share faster," the company said.
As growth slows in mature markets like the US, Netflix is increasingly focused on other parts of the world and investing in local-language content.
"While hundreds of millions of homes pay for Netflix, well over half of the world's broadband homes don't yet - representing huge future growth potential," the company said in a statement.
Benchmark analyst Matthew Harrigan warned that the uncertain global economy "is apt to emerge as an albatross" for member growth and Netflix's ability to continue raising prices as competition intensifies.
Streaming services are not the only form of entertainment vying for consumers' time. The latest Digital Media Trends survey from Deloitte, released late last month, revealed that Generation Z, those consumers ages 14 to 25, spend more time playing games than watching movies or television series at home, or even listening to music.
The majority of Gen Z and Millennial consumers polled said they spend more time watching user-created videos like those on TikTok and YouTube than watching films or shows on a streaming service.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Netflix's stumble a warning sign for streaming industry?​

Its loss of subscribers and market value crash come as rivals are racing towards the Netflix model.​

John Koblin and Nicole Sperling
zh-netflix.jpg

Netflix said this week that it lost more subscribers than it signed up in the first three months of the year, reversing a decade of steady growth. PHOTO: REUTERS


APR 23, 2022

(NYTIMES) - Many entertainment executives, tired of playing catch-up to a Silicon Valley interloper, have been waiting for the comeuppance of Netflix. But this may not have been the way they hoped it would happen.
Netflix said this week that it lost more subscribers than it signed up in the first three months of the year, reversing a decade of steady growth. The company's shares nose-dived 35 per cent on Wednesday while it shed about US$50 billion (S$68 billion) in market capitalisation.
The pain was shared across the industry as the stock of firms like Disney, Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount also declined.
Netflix blamed a number of issues, ranging from increased competition to its decision to drop all its subscribers in Russia because of the war in Ukraine. To entertainment executives and analysts, the moment felt decisive in the so-called streaming wars. After years of trying, they may see a chance to gain ground on their giant rival.
But Netflix's stunning reversal also raised a number of questions that will have to be answered in the coming months as more traditional media companies race towards subscription businesses largely modelled after what Netflix created.
Is there such a thing as too many streaming options? How many people are really willing to pay for them? And could this business be less profitable and far less reliable than what the industry has been doing for years?
"They switched from a sound business model to an unsound one," veteran entertainment executive Barry Diller said on Wednesday, referring to many legacy companies that have recently debuted streaming options. "I would guess today they're saying, 'Maybe trees don't grow to the skies.'"

The media industry, worried about declining movie theatre ticket sales and broadcast television ratings, has been reshaping itself on the fly to go all in on streaming and compete with Netflix. Disney has invested billions. Discovery Inc and WarnerMedia completed a merger this month to better compete with streaming behemoths. CNN even introduced a streaming version of itself, which has so far drawn underwhelming interest from subscribers.
But Netflix's sudden problems show that those investments come with a lot of risk. The streaming market may still be a giant one over the long term, but the next few years could be difficult, said Mr Rich Greenfield, an analyst at LightShed Partners and a long-time streaming booster. "No matter what, it looks far less profitable, and that's a problem for everybody," he said.

Rising costs, lower profits, higher churn rate​

Fewer subscribers coupled with increased costs because of fiercer competition to create original content mean less profit for everyone.

Another concern, some analysts say, is the so-called churn rate. Consumers are growing warier of rising prices for streaming services and becoming more likely to cancel a service when a favourite show comes to an end, said Mr Kevin Westcott, vice-chairman of consulting firm Deloitte.
According to Deloitte, 25 per cent of US customers have cancelled a streaming service only to resubscribe to it within a year. "They're frustrated that they have to have so many subscriptions to get all the content they want," Mr Westcott said.
Netflix's problems increase pressure on Disney, which will report subscriber numbers on May 11. If Disney's figures fail to live up to expectations, the distress signals surrounding the streaming business will grow louder.
There was also fear among Hollywood talent agents on Wednesday that the Netflix gravy train could slow and that the company's willingness to pay whatever it took for scripts and talent deals could vanish. The same went for producers.
Netflix has spent hundreds of millions of dollars over the past five years in pursuit of Academy Awards. It has yet to nab a best picture Oscar, but its commitment to prestige film-making has been praised.

"The effect on us will be if the new reality forces them to cut back on their US$17 billion-a-year programming budget," said Mr Michael Shamberg, whose four-part documentary on the Three Mile Island nuclear plant crisis will debut on Netflix next month. "As a producer, I always think of them as a first stop for pitching original ideas. If their subscriber growth levels off and it forces them to cut back on programming, will they stop taking risks on innovative TV shows and Oscar films?"
Netflix acknowledged that ferocious competition was partly a reason that growth had stalled. The company used to say its primary competition was not from other streaming services but from diversions like sleep and reading.

Content wars​

Now there is a question about whether Netflix's original content is strong enough to set it apart, as even deeper-pocketed companies like Apple and Amazon continue to increase their spending on critically acclaimed shows like Severance, which is carried on Apple TV+, and the upcoming first season of a Lord Of The Rings prequel, for which Amazon is said to be spending more than US$450 million.
"The reality is that with so much alternative content out there, where is the new stuff that is just crushing it? Where are the new franchises?" asked Mr Greenfield, the analyst. He noted that popular shows like Ozark, Stranger Things and The Crown will soon be ending their runs.
yu_strangerthings2304.jpg

Popular Netflix shows like Ozark, Stranger Things (pictured) and The Crown will soon be ending their runs. PHOTO: NETFLIX
Indeed, interest in Netflix's vast library has been showing signs of plateauing.
"For every single title on the Netflix catalog, the demand is pretty much flat," said Mr Alejandro Rojas, vice-president of applied analytics at Parrot Analytics, a research firm. "The catalog for HBO Max and Disney+ is growing double digits. That's a big difference."
Netflix's performance could also cause rivals to reconsider their own international expansion plans, potentially making more targeted efforts overseas. Netflix's subscriptions declined not just in the United States and Canada but also in Europe and Latin America.
"Netflix has thrown the kitchen sink at this," said industry analyst Michael Nathanson. "They were a first mover. They spent a ton on content, and they are making more localised content. They've done the right things and yet they've hit a wall."
Netflix executives, normally self-assured, seemed notably unsteady on Tuesday, when the first-quarter results were released. Co-CEO Reed Hastings, who once swore there would never be advertisements on Netflix, said the company would consider introducing a lower-priced, advertising-supported tier in the next year or two.
Netflix also said it would crack down on password sharing, a practice that in the past it said it had no problem with.

"We've been thinking about that for a couple of years, but when we were growing fast it wasn't a high priority to work on," Mr Hastings said. "And now, we're working super hard on it."
Netflix has no advertising sales experience, while rivals like Disney, Warner Bros Discovery and Paramount have vast advertising infrastructure. And the password crackdown led some analysts to wonder whether Netflix has already reached market saturation in the US. Mr Hastings tried to reassure everyone that Netflix had been through tough times before and that it would solve its problems.
He said the company was now "superfocused" on "getting back into our investors' good graces."
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Netflix lays off 150 staff in cutback after subscriber loss​

md_netflix_18052022.jpg

Netflix said last month that it lost some 200,000 subscriptions in the first three months of the year. PHOTO: REUTERS

May 18, 2022

NEW YORK (NYTIMES) - Following Netflix's surprise announcement last month that it lost subscribers for the first time in a decade, the streaming behemoth said on Tuesday (May 17) that it was laying off some 150 people across the company, primarily in the United States, representing 2 per cent of its total workforce.
"As we explained on earnings, our slowing revenue growth means we are also having to slow our cost growth as a company," Netflix said in a statement. "These changes are primarily driven by business needs rather than individual performance, which makes them especially tough as none of us want to say goodbye to such great colleagues."
There are likely to be additional layoffs later this year, according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
In the first quarter earnings call in April, Netflix's chief financial officer Spencer Neumann said that in the next two years the company intended to pull back on some of its spending.
While Netflix will continue to dedicate about US$17 billion (S$23.6 billion) annually to developing new television shows and movies, it will do so with fewer people working behind the scenes.
"We're trying to be smart about it and prudent in terms of pulling back on some of that spend growth to reflect the realities of the revenue growth of the business," Mr Neumann said at the time.
Netflix, long the leader when it came to worldwide subscribers, said last month that it lost around 200,000 subscriptions in the first three months of the year and that it was expecting an additional two million to leave the service during the second quarter.

The news sent shock waves through the entertainment industry, in which many companies have bet their futures on the continued growth of streaming.
In the weeks since the earnings announcement, Netflix announced it would do something its executives once vowed would never happen: allow subscribers the option to pay less for a version of the service that comes with ads. That is likely to happen by the end of the year.
At the same time, the company plans to crack down on password sharing, a practice Netflix believes has cost the company revenue from about 100 million unauthorised users who are watching the service and not paying for it.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

To the victors, the scraps​

Disney, Netflix, Apple: Is anyone winning the streaming wars?​

The Economist
LT%20-%20Opinion09.jpg

Attendees dressed as characters from Netflix’s Squid Game during Comic Con Special Edition in San Diego, California, in November. PHOTO: AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE


FEB 9, 2022

A teenage girl who periodically transforms into a giant panda is the improbable star of Turning Red, a coming-of-age movie from Disney due out next month.
The world's biggest media company, which will celebrate its 100th birthday next year, is no adolescent. But Disney is going through some awkward changes of its own as it reorganises its business - worth US$260 billion (S$350 billion) - around the barely two-year-old venture of video-streaming.
So far the experiment has been a success. The company's streaming operation, Disney+, initially aimed for at least 60 million subscribers in its first five years, ending in 2024. It got there in less than 12 months, and now hopes for as many as 260 million subscribers by that date.
Mr Bob Chapek, who took over as chief executive just before the pandemic, is convinced that Disney's future lies in streaming directly to the consumer, his "north star". Disney+ is all but guaranteed to be among the survivors of the ruthless period of competition that has become known as the streaming wars.
But doubts are surfacing across the industry about how much of a prize awaits the victors.
Every year, Disney and its rivals promise to spend more on content. And yet the growth in subscribers is showing signs of slowing. A realisation is setting in that old media companies are pivoting from a highly profitable cable-TV business to a distinctly less rewarding alternative.
Amid a bout of market volatility which last week saw Alphabet's and Amazon's share prices rise by a tenth or more and Meta's fall by a quarter, investors were awaiting Disney's quarterly results today with some trepidation. So, too, is Mr Chapek, whose contract expires one year from now.

Markets took fright last month when Netflix, the leading streamer, forecast that in the first quarter of the year, it would add just 2.5 million new members. That would be the weakest first quarter since 2010, when most Netflix subscribers still got DVDs by mail. Its share price fell by more than a quarter on the news. The previous quarter, Disney said it had added only 2.1 million streaming subscribers, the least in its short experience, sending another judder through markets. With some exceptions, growth has slowed across the industry.
The firms blame temporary headwinds: A continuing Covid-19 hangover, content delays and, in the case of Apple TV+, the phasing out of free trials. But some analysts are concluding that the ceiling for subscriptions is lower than they had thought.
Morgan Stanley, an investment bank, now thinks Netflix will end 2024 with 260 million global members, down from its earlier estimate of 300 million. And though streamers see the potential to raise prices in rich-world markets, that will be harder in the faster-growing poor ones. In India, Netflix recently slashed the price of its basic plan from US$6.60 to US$2.60 a month. Morgan Stanley now expects Netflix's total revenue to grow by about 10 per cent a year in the medium term, not the 15 per cent or more it had previously predicted.


As revenue growth slows, costs swell. Media firms will spend more than US$230 billion on video content this year, nearly double the figure a decade ago, forecasts Ampere Analysis, a research firm.
Netflix's weak results came despite what it billed as its "strongest content slate ever", including Squid Game, its most popular series, and Red Notice, its most successful film. Disney+ is doing far better than the company ever dreamt - but it is costing more, too. Three years ago, Disney said it would spend about US$2 billion on streaming content in 2024. Mr Chapek recently said the figure would be more than US$9 billion.
220209_stestream-online.jpg

Spending is going up partly because the costs of filming have risen. The final season of WarnerMedia's Game Of Thrones, in 2019, cost around US$15 million per episode, which then seemed steep. Amazon's serialised Lord Of The Rings, due in September, reportedly cost about four times as much.
And audiences have become more demanding. Most people used to cancel their cable-TV subscription only when they moved house, says Mr Doug Shapiro, former chief strategy officer at Turner Broadcasting System, a television company. Now, he says, they are "becoming accustomed to churning on or off over the quality of content", signing up to devour the latest hit and then cancelling their membership.
Apple TV+, which has the most serious retention problem, loses a tenth of its customers every month, said Antenna, a data firm, meaning that every year it churns through the equivalent of more than 100 per cent of its members.
The combination of rising costs and slowing revenue growth "calls into question the end-state economics of these businesses", argues MoffettNathanson, a firm of analysts.

Netflix, the most successful of the bunch, expects its operating margin to shrink in 2022, for the first time in at least six years, to 19 per cent; it has attributed its compressed margins to higher spending on programming. MoffettNathanson adds that these figures flatter the firm's performance. Like other streamers, Netflix amortises the cost of content over several years, when in reality most of its shows are binged in a matter of weeks. (The company insists that its amortisation schedule is based on viewing patterns.)
Streaming's pinched economics are especially galling for old media firms like Disney, which are used to the far more profitable cable-TV business.
Last year, Disney reported an operating margin of 30 per cent for its linear TV networks, a typical figure for the industry. The average American cable bill is nearly US$100 a month - and viewers are usually subjected to advertising on top of that.
Media firms are accelerating the decline of this profitable business by shifting their best content from cable to their streaming services. They are also forgoing box-office revenue by sending movies straight to streaming (though Covid-19-related cinema closures have often forced their hand). Animators at Disney's Pixar studio are said to be miffed that Turning Red is not getting an outing at the cinema in most countries.
There is little choice but to stick with the strategy. Cable is not coming back; streaming is expected to account for half of TV viewing in America by 2024. The focus is increasingly turning to how to make the new business more profitable.
Streamers increasingly drip-feed new episodes rather than dropping entire series. Bundling is becoming more common: Disney sells Disney+ along with ESPN+, its sports streamer, and Hulu, a general entertainment service that it jointly owns with Comcast, a cable giant. Apple and Amazon both package TV with other services. WarnerMedia and Discovery are set to merge this year.


There may be more to come. "If Netflix is decelerating more rapidly than expected, the great streaming rebundling may need to begin sooner rather than later," writes Mr Benjamin Swinburne of Morgan Stanley.
The hope at the bigger media firms is that the streaming wars will eventually claim some casualties, leaving the survivors free to raise their prices and dial down spending on content. Peacock, Comcast's streamer, is trailing. Viacomcbs, which owns Paramount+, is the subject of endless takeover rumours.
But even their exit from the industry would leave some determined competitors. Warner-Discovery is betting its future on streaming. Apple and Amazon are getting better at making hits, and have enough money to run at a loss for as long as they like. Disney and Netflix are not going anywhere. It looks like being a long war, and short on spoils.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Grab revenue rises, loss narrows on delivery, ride demand​

hzgrab190522.jpg

Grab managed to grow paying users 10 per cent after South-east Asian countries removed pandemic-era restrictions. PHOTO: ST FILE

May 19, 2022

NEW YORK (BLOOMBERG) - Grab Holdings said revenue rose 6 per cent in the first quarter after the ride-hailing and delivery company won back consumers as the pandemic receded in South-east Asia.
Revenue increased to US$228 million (S$316 million) after the Singapore-based company added sales from Jaya Grocer, a platform it acquired in January.
That was more than the US$139.2 million analysts were expecting, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
Grab's net loss narrowed to US$435 million, as the company fights to gain profitability following years of heavy spending in pursuit of market share.
The company managed to grow paying users 10 per cent to 30.9 million after South-east Asian countries removed pandemic-era restrictions. Per-user spending climbed 19 per cent, it said.
Unlike other Internet companies that are grappling with cooling post-Covid-19 online activity, Grab's car-hailing and delivery businesses benefit as life returned to normal.
The company had struggled since becoming a publicly listed company in the United States through a merger with a blank-check company in December.

Mounting losses, coupled with a broad tech sell-off, have weighed on its shares, which have lost more than 70 per cent since the start-up went public.
Revenue from the delivery business jumped 70 per cent to US$91 million, while revenue from the mobility business declined 22 per cent to US$112 million.
Revenue from financial services rose to US$11 million.
Deliveries gross merchandise value (GMV) was US$2.56 billion versus its forecast of US$2.4 billion to US$2.5 billion.
Mobility GMV was US$834 million versus its forecast of US$750 million to US$800 million.
The company said it expects full-year revenue to increase to US$1.2 billion to US$1.3 billion.
Grab's cash and cash equivalents fell to US$3.4 billion at the end of March from about US$5 billion at the end of 2021, partly because of cash outflow from operating activities and the acquisition of Jaya Grocer.


Partner incentives climbed 55 per cent to US$216 million, while consumer incentives rose 85 per cent to US$344 million.
The company sees GMV growing 30 per cent to 35 per cent in 2022.
Grab shares rose more than 3.5 per cent in pre-market trading in New York.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

S'pore start-up Zilingo fires CEO Ankiti Bose, reserves right to pursue legal action​

ads-zilingo-20052022.jpg


Ms Ankiti Bose said her employment was terminated on grounds of "insubordination", while Zilingo said the ouster followed a probe into complaints of serious financial irregularities. PHOTO: ZILINGO
chooyunting.png



Choo Yun Ting
Business Correspondent

May 20, 2022

SINGAPORE - E-commerce platform Zilingo has terminated its chief executive Ankiti Bose, also the co-founder of the firm, following an investigation into complaints of serious financial irregularities.
In a statement on Friday (May 20), the Singapore-based firm said it decided to terminate Ms Bose’s employment “with cause” and that it reserves the right to pursue appropriate legal action.
The start-up, which counts Sequoia Capital India, Singapore state investor Temasek, and the Economic Development Board’s investment arm EDBI among its investors, had earlier suspended Ms Bose on March 31.
In its statement, Zilingo said that Ms Bose brought “certain harassment-related issues pertaining to past time periods” to the attention of the firm’s board on April 11.
These issues did not include any harassment complaints against investors or their nominees, it added, noting that a top consulting firm had been engaged to look into the claims brought forth.
“The investigation has concluded that the company took appropriate action and followed due process to address these complaints that were brought to their notice, contrary to media reports that have suggested that the suspension and investigation into Ankiti Bose were aimed at suppressing the said harassment claims,” Zilingo said.
Bloomberg News reported that Ms Bose said in a separate statement that her employment was terminated on grounds of insubordination, after being suspended on the basis of an “anonymous whistle-blower complaint”.

In its statement, Zilingo said: “The company is deeply pained and disappointed to see the manner in which the board, investors and employees have been constantly attacked through ostensibly leaked and fake information, along with what unfortunately appears to be paid and defamatory social media campaigns throughout the investigation period.”
This has cause irreparable damage to the start-up, board, staff and backers, it added.
The company noted that following the recall of loans by debt holders, an independent financial adviser was appointed and is in the midst of assessing options for the business.

More information will be provided in due course, it said.
Ms Bose had earlier been suspended from her duties while the start-up’s accounting practices were investigated. Regulatory checks show that Zilingo’s last financial statement was filed in 2019.
Ms Bose, who co-founded the company with Mr Dhruv Kapoor in 2015, has disputed claims of wrongdoing.
Commenting on corporate governance issues that start-ups face, NUS Business School’s Professor Mak Yuen Teen noted that such issues are not uncommon. Start-ups here and elsewhere have faced the likes of toxic culture, product fraud, financial irregularities and conflict of interest, he noted.
“Founders are by their nature entrepreneurial and risk takers, and may push the boundaries. They are also often charismatic and able to convince people to buy into their vision,” he said.
Prof Mak added that with problems emerging in start-ups, investors may be more careful about due diligence before investing and may demand better corporate governance, and start-ups that are not prepared for these may find it harder to attract investors.
Start-ups need to ensure that they have at least the basic corporate governance in place, he said.
This includes measures such as having accounts audited by a respectable audit firm on a timely basis, having proper internal controls for key business operations, having an internal audit of the key risk areas, and having a properly constituted board with some independent members.
Singapore Institute of Directors vice-chairman Adrian Chan said that while he does not believe confidence in the boards or founders of start-ups has necessarily been shaken by Zilingo’s situation, there are lessons to be learnt from this case and the issues that have surfaced.
Mr Chan, who also serves on the Enterprise Board of the SMU Institute of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, noted that start-up boards and founders should be trained and equipped with the necessary governance skills and knowledge to run their businesses effectively.
“Paying heed to corporate governance makes good business sense and should not be viewed as a burden. And if boards fail to recognise this early on, they may find themselves paying a higher price later on,” he said.
 

congo9

Alfrescian
Loyal
Fintech business like wise, u trip big pay, Instaram are just sucking onto your personal credit card to come up with a debit card. U need to top up the balance before using your debit card.

Can't they just offer personal credit using their own card?

WTF Is fintech?
 
Last edited:

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Two senior Grab executives quit as company rejigs unit to stem losses​

ads-grab-25052022.jpg

The latest executive departures come as Grab's losses rose to $5 billion in 2021 from $3.7 billion a year earlier. PHOTO: REUTERS

May 25, 2022

SINGAPORE (REUTERS) - Two top executives at Grab Holdings' fintech business have quit, adding to other senior departures in recent months, as the South-east Asian ride-hailing and delivery firm rejigs the key unit at the loss-making group, two sources said.
Mr Chris Yeo, who heads Grab's payments and rewards business and has been with the company for nearly six years, is leaving along with Mr Jeffrey Goh, who leads the payments gateway business, the sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Both Mr Yeo and Mr Goh worked at the Grab Financial Group's (GFG) GrabFin unit, which provides digital payments, financing, insurance, rewards, and wealth management services, and is an important plank of Grab's regional growth strategy.
The latest executive departures come as Grab's losses rose to US$3.6 billion (S$5 billion) in 2021 from US$2.7 billion a year earlier, while revenue rose 44 per cent, with investors focusing on how the firm plans to stem losses.
Grab narrowed its loss in the first quarter.
Since listing on Nasdaq in December after a record US$40 billion merger with a blank cheque firm, Grab's shares have shed three-quarters of their value against a backdrop of plunging tech stocks and its continued losses.
"Many business groups within GrabFin have been put on notice with significant performance metrics," said one of the sources. "There's an intense focus on getting to profitability." Mr Yeo and Mr Goh, managing directors at Grab, which counts SoftBank Group's Vision Fund and Uber as its biggest shareholders, are serving their notice periods, said the sources, declining to be identified as they were not authorised to speak to the media.

The news of their exit and the rejig at GrabFin had not been made public previously.
The departures at GrabFin come a month after Grab's head of lending, former banker Ankur Mehrotra, who played a key role in the fintech unit's expansion, quit after a six-year stint.
This year, one of Grab's senior tech executives also departed to lead a cryptocurrency gaming firm, while Grab's head of insurance and wealth left to form a start-up.

Grab declined to comment specifically on the executives' departures. There was no immediate response from Mr Yeo and Mr Goh to a Reuters query.
In an e-mail response to Reuters, Grab said it was focused on expanding its regional fintech ecosystem and saw significant opportunity in South-east Asia across all its businesses.
It said its fintech operations would now be led by its country teams.
Grab last week forecast a rebound in its mainstay ride-share and food delivery businesses as South-east Asian economies recover from a pandemic-led slump.

Mr Anthony Tan, Grab's co-founder and CEO, told analysts that Grab was driving towards profitability through disciplined cost management.
GrabFin was streamlining its regional and country teams with a view to focus on lucrative areas, the sources said. One of the sources said the company was seeking to cut losses in the many areas GrabFin operated in.
Grab, which operates in 480 cities in eight countries in South-east Asia, has more than five million registered drivers and two million-plus merchants on its platform. The company sees GFG as a business with huge growth potential.
Grab's regional digital banking business, which includes a digital banking joint venture in Singapore and Malaysia, is also part of GFG. Grab also acquired a minority stake in an Indonesian bank this year.
Grab said in response to The Straits Times: “Grab has been built on the contributions of many Grabbers over the years and we wish them well when they move on to pursue new opportunities. We also thank them for building a strong bench over the years, and congratulate the Grabbers who are taking on new leadership positions.”
The company added that it continues to be focused on the expansion of their regional fintech ecosystem and see significant opportunity in South-east Asia across the payments, lending, insurance, and banking businesses.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Shopee lays off workers in food delivery, online payments and global teams​

sv_shopee_140622.jpg

Sea, which owns Shopee, beat sales estimates and posted a smaller-than-expected loss in the first quarter of 2022. PHOTO: REUTERS
tayhongyibyline_0.png


Tay Hong Yi

June 14, 2022

SINGAPORE - South-east Asian e-commerce giant Shopee will lay off some workers in its ShopeeFood and ShopeePay teams in the region.
It will also let go part of its teams in Mexico, Argentina and Chile, as well as a cross-border team supporting the market in Spain, according to an internal memo seen by The Straits Times on Tuesday (June 14).
In the memo sent late on Monday, Shopee chief executive Chris Feng said it is "making some adjustments to optimise our operations in certain segments and markets".
"(Given) elevated uncertainty in the broader economy, we believe that it is prudent to make certain difficult but important adjustments to enhance our operational efficiency and focus our resources," he added.
Staff were informed of the cuts, among other changes, at an international town hall event on Monday, with those laid off told via e-mail.
The platform will also end its early-stage pilot in Spain.
This comes after Shopee exited the French market in March, ending a similar early-stage pilot there.

Said Mr Feng: "Our business will continue operating as per usual in Shopee Mexico, Argentina, Chile, as well as for ShopeeFood and ShopeePay in South-east Asia.
"We are committed to providing the same level of support to our users, partners and merchants in all these markets."


The memo did not specify which South-east Asian countries would be affected by the layoffs. Shopee has outposts in Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines, with its regional headquarters in the Republic.
He added that the company will do "the very best we can" to support affected workers, as the move would majorly impact them and their families.
The layoffs come even as New York-listed Sea, which owns Shopee, beat sales estimates and posted a smaller-than-expected loss in the first quarter of this year, driven by strong showings in its core e-commerce and digital payments business.
A Shopee spokesman declined comment when approached by ST to confirm the scale of the layoffs, the roles involved and whether workers in Singapore are affected.


ST has also contacted Sea and tech workers’ union Tech Talent Assembly, which is affiliated with the National Trades Union Congress, for comment.
According to professional networking platform LinkedIn, Shopee has over 48,000 employees worldwide.
Major tech companies like Sea, which raked in windfalls amid rapid digitalisation forced by the Covid-19 pandemic, are now heading into a world marked by high inflation, scarce labour, and supply chain disruptions that threaten to eat into profits.
Shaken by these uncertainties, investors have begun to eschew loss-making tech stocks in recent months.


Citing sources aware of the matter, financial news site DealStreetAsia reported the layoffs cut across several South-east Asian markets including Indonesia, Thailand and Vietnam.
Nearly half of Shopee Thailand’s payment and food delivery teams were affected by the downsizing, they said.
A separate source also told the website that Shopee has stopped hiring, with several job offers for regional roles rescinded.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Zilingo's board to weigh options including liquidation or buyout​

md_dhruv_21062022.jpg

Zilingo's co-founder Dhruv Kapoor briefly made the pitch for a buyout, a surprise, last-minute development. PHOTO: ZILINGO

June 21, 2022

SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) - Zilingo's board of directors is weighing options for the embattled Singapore start-up after a financial adviser to the company said liquidation is the most viable solution and its co-founder presented an 11th-hour pitch for a management buyout.
The board members met on Monday (June 20) to hear the alternatives, including a presentation from adviser Deloitte to sell off the company's assets, according to sources familiar with the matter.
Co-founder Dhruv Kapoor briefly made the pitch for a buyout, a surprise, last-minute development, said the sources, asking not to be identified because the discussions are private.
The board meeting ended without a decision on Zilingo's fate, they said.
Directors will consider Deloitte's findings as well as the new management buyout proposal, and they are trying to set a date for a new gathering.
Zilingo and Deloitte representatives did not respond to requests for comment.
Mr Kapoor proposed the buyout to the Singapore-based company's board late on Sunday.


He has secured commitments from a small group of new investors including a United States private equity firm, Bloomberg News reported on Sunday.
The offer detailed plans for the investor group to inject US$8 million (S$11.1 million) in new equity in a newly incorporated entity in tranches, while the remaining assets and the old corporate entity would be liquidated in due course.
Ms Ankiti Bose, the start-up's ousted chief executive, endorsed Mr Kapoor's preliminary proposal minutes after it was sent out to existing shareholders.
In her e-mail, as seen by Bloomberg News, Ms Bose urged investors to see beyond their "personal differences" and support the initiative.
Allegations of financial irregularities in March prompted an investigation into Zilingo, valued at US$970 million in 2019, and led to the dismissal of co-founder Ms Bose as CEO in May.
Her ouster plunged the once high-flying start-up into crisis and sent shock waves through South-east Asia and India's technology industry.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Brokers’ take: Maybank downgrades Grab to ‘sell’ on mounting recession risks​


FRI, JUL 08, 2022
YONG HUI TING[email protected]@yhuitingBT
DELIVERY.jpg

Maybank Research on Friday (Jul 8) slashed the target price for Grab by almost half, from US$4.25 to US$2.29 and downgraded the counter from “buy” to “sell” to factor in the new risks from a potential recession.
BT PHOTO: YONG HUI TING
RECESSION risks are mounting for South-east Asian superapp Grab, as capital market expectations appear to have changed on investor projections of further rate hikes by the US Federal Reserve.
Maybank Research on Friday (Jul 8) slashed the target price for Grab by almost half, from US$4.25 to US$2.29 and downgraded the counter from “buy” to “sell” to factor in the new risks from a potential recession.
The brokerage was unimpressed by Grab’s recent pivot to software as a service (Saas) via GrabMaps, calling it a “desperate wringing for cash flows where it can”, and likened the move similar to an act of “pawning the family jewels”.

Analyst Samuel Tan was also sceptical of the ride-hailing giant’s target of 10 per cent of the US$1 billion mapping market by 2025 as he foresees a “more challenging capital expenditure situation” amongst other technology platforms, which are a key customer segment for GrabMaps.
“Exposing its APIs could make Grab vulnerable to IP risks, such as scraping and copying by other technology rivals, eroding its edge over time,” said Tan.
Saas is a software distribution model in which a cloud provider hosts applications and makes them available to end users over the Internet. Through this model, an independent software vendor may contract a third-party cloud provider to host the application.

The analyst further believes there is greater investor favour over more mature SaaS and superapp names, such as Salesforce and Tencent, noting that these companies have not experienced as great a fall in share price as Grab. From the start of Q3 2021, Grab’s counter has fallen about 78 per cent, whereas Salesforce and Tencent were down 28 per cent over the same period.
“We see Grab as still being in a transitionary phase, having neither a mini-apps ecosystem nor a meaningful recurring SaaS revenue stream, and therefore, increasingly disfavoured by investors,” Tan said.
The research house however, capped its price floor expectations of US$1.35 to Grab’s share price after taking into account the firm’s PIPE (private investment in public equity) cash injection of US$4.3 billion in Q4 2021, which Tan believes was “well-timed” in shoring up Grab’s finances.
Additionally, the tech company can also benefit from improvements in the mobility segment as the region adapts to living with Covid-19, such as the resumption of GrabShare, further digital bank ventures in Philippines and Thailand and more mini-apps features in the style of other superapps.
Other upside factors include an improvement in competitive position from coalescing of the Grab-Singtel-Emtek-Bukalapak alliance into a multi-prong strategy in Indonesia against GoTo, and the easing of monetary policy by the US Fed.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

S'pore staff express shock after losing Shopify jobs​

md_shopify_04082022.jpg

Shopify shares have fallen by 73 per cent since the start of the year. PHOTO: AFP
rosalind_byline.png


Rosalind Ang

Aug 4, 2022

SINGAPORE - Local staff of e-commerce giant Shopify have expressed their shock and disappointment at being laid off by the Canadian firm as it reels from slowing business and overly ambitious expansion plans.
The company axed around 1,000 of its global workforce of 10,000 employees on July 27, although it would not disclose the number of staff who lost their jobs in Singapore.
One former employee here wrote on professional networking platform LinkedIn that he had woken up to an e-mail informing him that he was being let go. "I gave my blood, sweat and tears to the organisation, wonky sleepless nights, planning ahead for what's next to build a better infrastructure and team for the region," he added.
Another former employee wrote on LinkedIn: "I was part of the Shopify layoffs, and these few days have been filled with self-doubt, self-pity and shock."
Most of the impacted roles are in recruiting, support and sales, noted chief executive Tobi Lutke, who said on July 26 that the firm's decision to expand rapidly did not pay off as expected after the pandemic began waning.
Shopify shares have fallen by 73 per cent since the start of the year due to the economic slowdown and the easing of Covid-19 restrictions. This, in turn, hampered online shopping, which had boomed during the pandemic.
Mr Lutke said on the firm's website: "We bet that the... share of dollars that travel through e-commerce rather than physical retail would permanently leap ahead by five or even 10 years (due to the pandemic). It's now clear that bet didn't pay off."

He added that the share of dollars commanded by e-commerce is still growing steadily, but not at the rate he had expected.
The Straits Times understands that all affected employees were invited to meetings with human resources representatives in their respective countries to ask questions and discuss details of their exit packages, which were developed in line with local regulations.
Affected staff have been given 16 weeks of severance pay, plus an additional week for every year of tenure at Shopify, Mr Lutke wrote in his post.
Their medical benefits were also extended and they will have access to career coaching, resume crafting and interview support.
Shopify was founded in 2006 and began operating in Singapore in 2013. It is fully remote, with no physical outlets.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

How a celebrity CEO's rule of fear helped bring down hot Singapore start-up Zilingo​

ac_ankikibose_040822.jpg


Zilingo suspended its 30-year-old chief executive officer Ankiti Bose over complaints about alleged financial irregularities in March. ST PHOTO: FELINE LIM

Aug 4, 2022

SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) - At first glance, the implosion of vaunted fashion start-up Zilingo looked jarringly sudden.
When the Singapore tech darling suspended its 30-year-old chief executive officer Ankiti Bose over complaints about alleged financial irregularities, it was March. Within weeks, creditors were recalling loans, more than 100 employees had left, and Ms Bose found herself fired, though she denies any wrongdoing. The company's survival is now in question.
The Zilingo meltdown has rattled the tech industry in South-east Asia and beyond. The start-up had raised more than US$300 million (S$414 million) from some of the region's most prominent investors, including Singapore investment company Temasek and Sequoia Capital India, the regional arm of the Silicon Valley firm that backed Apple and Google. Ms Bose was a celebrity who criss-crossed the globe to speak at tech gatherings from Hong Kong to California.
Interviews with more than 60 people, including current and former staff, merchants, investors, entrepreneurs and friends of the key players, suggest that Zilingo struggled for years under Ms Bose's leadership. Her management style alienated employees and undermined the business, according to staff who worked under her.
The start-up veered from one strategy to another in pursuit of sales, including a US$1 million promotional trip in Morocco, loans to customers and a short-lived push into the United States. At one point, she became fixated on "crazy growth" to catch the attention of Japanese tech titan Masayoshi Son, according to two former employees with direct knowledge of the matter.
At the heart of the company's breakdown lies the soured relationship between Ms Bose and her long-time supporter, Mr Shailendra Singh, head of Sequoia India. Allies for years, they fell out as financial pressures mounted. Mr Singh lost faith in the management skills of the young founder he had championed, while Ms Bose believed Mr Singh betrayed her by pushing her out of her own company, according to people familiar with their relationship, who requested anonymity as the talks were private.
The clash grew so acrimonious that Sequoia's lawyers demanded in a May legal notice that Ms Bose stop making allegations that could tarnish Sequoia's reputation, the people said.

Zilingo's turmoil highlights an apparent lax internal corporate governance culture that is not uncommon in the start-up industry. For two years, the company failed to file annual financial statements, a basic requirement for all businesses of its size in Singapore. Auditor KPMG has yet to sign off on Zilingo's financial year 2020 results. While it is not unusual for start-ups to miss these deadlines, which can result in a fine of up to $600, it is typically a warning sign that firmer action may be needed by the board.
Yet, investors, including Temasek and the Economic Development Board's investment arm EDBI, put more funds into Zilingo at the end of 2020. Shareholders that together own a majority stake of the company only formally acted against Ms Bose after whistle-blower complaints were filed earlier this year.

Tech warning​

The saga has also become a warning for the region's tech community, which is assessing the fallout of global economic shocks from Covid-19, the war in Ukraine and global inflation.


"Whatever happened at Zilingo, there will be a lot more dramas in the next couple of years as the big worldwide recession impedes hot shots from raising money," said veteran investor Jim Rogers, chairman of Rogers Holdings in Singapore. "I have seen this rodeo before."
Bloomberg News reviewed dozens of internal documents, e-mails, texts and other media from Zilingo, and Ms Bose sat for two extensive interviews, one before and one after her dismissal from the company on May 20. The board's decision to fire her was not abrupt, but rather the culmination of years of tension, according to the documents and people with direct knowledge of the matter.
"Board members were concerned about the company's performance over the last few years and sought to share suggestions to address the company's performance including cash burn," Zilingo and its board said in a statement to Bloomberg News.
"In March 2022, investors received complaints about serious financial irregularities which appeared to require investigation. With the support of the majority investor shareholders, an independent forensic investigations consultancy was appointed to look into the said complaints. After a comprehensive process lasting almost two months, including numerous opportunities for Ms Bose to provide documents and information, the company subsequently terminated Ms Bose for cause based on the findings of that investigation."
SPH Brightcove Video

Ms Bose said the process to terminate her was an "unfair witch hunt" and denied that she was given numerous opportunities to respond to allegations. She said she has not seen the investigation report, which was not made public. On the board's suggestion to implement changes, she said the team cut the cash burn by 70 per cent between the end of 2019 and the end of 2021.
"It was not easy, we did not succeed at everything," she said in July. "It was chaotic and painful, but we did do it and we made the best effort we could."
Zilingo's origin story is part of South-east Asia's start-up lore. Ms Bose came up with the idea as she wandered through Bangkok's Chatuchak market, where 15,000 stalls offer goods from across Thailand. She and co-founder Dhruv Kapoor wanted to build a platform that would allow such small merchants to sell to consumers across South-east Asia.

Mr Singh was instrumental from the start. He and Ms Bose had worked together at Sequoia and he was happy to support one of the firm's own. Mr Singh had started his career in Sequoia's Silicon Valley office, learning at the side of veteran investors Michael Moritz and Doug Leone. Mr Singh had transformed Sequoia Capital India over 16 years into the region's biggest venture capital (VC) firm with some US$9 billion of assets under management and 36 unicorns on its score sheet across India and South-east Asia.
He invested in Zilingo's seed round in 2015, when Ms Bose was 23 years old, and in every fund raising since. "We think the world of her," he told a fellow venture capitalist in 2016, in an e-mail seen by Bloomberg News.
ac_DhruvK_040822.jpg


Mr Dhruv Kapoor, co-founder and chief technology officer of fashion e-commerce marketplace Zilingo. PHOTO: ZILINGO
But like many upstarts, Ms Bose and Mr Kapoor faced challenges almost from the beginning. Their consumer-focused fashion site struggled because of the thin margins and low average income in South-east Asia, a fragmented region with different languages and currencies. By late 2017, they decided to reposition Zilingo into a business-to-business platform, where small manufacturers and wholesalers could sell goods directly to small retailers in the region.
In 2018, Zilingo raised US$54 million from investors. The company decided to splurge US$1 million to whisk nine social media influencers to Morocco for a three-day extravaganza, complete with camel rides, a hot-air balloon trip, yoga lessons and gourmet dinners.
It was a massive flop, according to an early employee with direct knowledge of the event. The goal of #ZilingoEscape was to bring in one million new users, one for each US$1 spent. The final tally was about 10,000, the person said. Ms Bose declined to comment specifically on the campaign, but said it was part of the company's US$10 million annual marketing budget.
This appears to have become a pattern for Ms Bose. With cash in Zilingo's coffers, she would dive into new initiatives to supercharge growth even if the immediate financial benefits were questionable. In one example, Ms Bose suggested that Zilingo subsidise a 2 per cent to 4 per cent discount for transactions, effectively paying merchants to trade with one another. She cheered on the team as gross merchandise value hit US$1 million for the first two months, even though Zilingo was getting no fees from the merchants, said a person directly involved.
In 2018, Ms Bose came up with the idea of giving out loans to suppliers and vendors who needed capital. It took off, so in the coming months Ms Bose cranked up the pressure. She told the team to give out more loans each month on a running basis, the person said. But no one could have predicted the pandemic, or the toll it would take on start-ups like Zilingo, and much of the debt had to be written off.
Yet Ms Bose's star was rising in the industry. In early 2019, Zilingo raised US$226 million, lifting its valuation to US$970 million. The charismatic CEO wooed tech gatherings with her vision of how start-ups like hers were a new model for the emerging world.
"We are about to shake things up quite a bit," Ms Bose said at a panel discussion in Singapore, flashing a wide smile and drawing applause from the audience.
Inside the company, she drove staff relentlessly. In one instance, Ms Bose messaged a senior lieutenant early on a Sunday morning and called about a dozen times. When the employee did not pick up immediately, she told the lieutenant: "You obviously don't care about the company enough."

Publicly, the company seemed to be going from strength to strength. In July 2019, Mr James Perry, former managing director and Asia-Pacific head of technology investment banking for Citigroup, joined Zilingo as its first chief financial officer.
It was a coup for Ms Bose, some 20 years Mr Perry's junior. Ms Bose said in an interview with Bloomberg News in 2019 that Mr Perry's experience and respect in the financial world would complement her "young and crazy" self and give confidence to investors. "He's James Perry, he's a god in finance," she said.
In the investment world, her big target remained Mr Son, whose SoftBank Group had upended venture capital by making huge bets on unproven start-ups. Ms Bose told her deputies that Zilingo needed to achieve rapid growth to catch Mr Son's attention, one of the deputies said.
Ms Bose met Mr Son twice that year, once in Jakarta and a second time in Tokyo, according to people familiar with the matter. She explained her vision for Zilingo, but Mr Son never backed her. Neither did KKR & Co, which was considering investing in the start-up at the time, the people said.
In October 2019, Zilingo announced it would spend US$100 million to expand into the US, establishing offices in New York and Los Angeles. Ms Bose's idea was to take advantage of then President Donald Trump's trade war by offering American retailers a way to avoid tariffs by finding producers outside China. Less than a year later, the company shut its US operations.
By the end of 2019, Mr Singh and other directors had told Ms Bose several times to slow the cash burn. But Mr Singh was not getting regular financial reports from Ms Bose, and it was not till a board meeting in November that the directors learnt that the company was actually going through some US$7 million to US$8 million a month, more than they had expected. Mr Singh picked up the phone and had a tough conversation with Ms Bose, according to people with knowledge of the conversations.

Guzzling money​

It turns out that the company was guzzling money. The US$226 million Zilingo had raised from investors in early 2019 was gone in less than two years.
In 2020, the pandemic battered the business and Ms Bose saw an opportunity to supply personal protective equipment, inking a deal in April to supply 10 million KN-95 masks, valued at US$22.5 million, to India. Six months later, Zilingo was embroiled in a legal battle with the Indian government, which claimed the company had failed to deliver 3.2 million of the masks on time. The company did not comment on the lawsuit, which is still ongoing.
In September, Mr Perry left Zilingo to rejoin Citigroup.

Inside the company, former employees paint a picture of a boss who ruled by fear. She allegedly told some staff they would have no second chance in the start-up industry because of her powerful connections. She would publicly shame employees and declare that she had to do everything herself to save the company, one person said. Another described her as a narcissist who would throw anyone under the bus if it meant saving her own reputation.
Asked in an interview in Singapore before she was fired about the culture under her leadership, Ms Bose uncharacteristically paused and stared out of the window as the sun set over the city.
"I was 23 when I started the company," she said eventually. "I liked having control at the beginning. Of course, I made mistakes and learnt from them. By the time we got to the stage where we had all these senior people, I don't think I was a control freak."
In her most recent interview with Bloomberg in July, Ms Bose reiterated that she has not done anything wrong. "I'm going to be a lot calmer, a lot more empathetic and understanding of how people work together. That has been a big learning for me. Managing people, managing relationships, managing communications - I think all of this is coming down to that," she said.
By November 2020, Zilingo had barely enough cash to last a month. A group of existing investors, including Sequoia, EDBI, Sofina, Temasek and SIG, stepped in to rescue the company by purchasing US$25 million of convertible notes.
In January 2021, Mr Singh and Ms Bose met at the Four Seasons Hotel's alfresco cafe as they did from time to time to talk shop. Mr Singh suggested that Ms Bose consider stepping aside. He said Mr Ananth Narayanan, founder of brand-building service Mensa Brands and former CEO of fashion platform Myntra, could be a potential successor. The two men had met recently and, when Mr Narayanan said he was looking for a new opportunity, Mr Singh had thought of Zilingo.
Ms Bose was shocked. "Not yet," she said.
She went home and, that night, sent a series of emotional texts to Mr Singh, saying his suggestion was a gender-related issue and pouring her heart out. She said her departure would make her look bad, as though the firm needed to be saved by someone else. Mr Singh said it was just a preliminary idea and there was no need to discuss it again. He urged her instead to focus on improving metrics, finding a new CFO and fund raising, according to people familiar with the meeting and texts seen by Bloomberg.
Ms Bose ended the chat by saying they should work together towards the best possible outcome, and Mr Singh replied with two thumbs-up emojis. It was 2.29am.
The mounting pressure was also testing the relationship between Ms Bose and co-founder Mr Kapoor, the chief technology officer. They had clashed over the future of the company the previous month when the company was scrambling to stay afloat.
"I am scared honestly that we will not hit our goals," she texted Mr Kapoor several hours after the chat with Mr Singh. "When something is wrong, the blame falls on me, but everyone's there to take credit for the good," she wrote.
"I don't like being hated for busting my ass at all," she added.
Ms Bose spent most of the year trying to pull in more funds. In July 2021, the company took mezzanine debt of US$40 million from Indies Capital Partners and Varde Partners, but subsequent efforts to raise money from private equity and venture capital firms failed. One issue was a concern from potential investors that users were making fake transactions in key markets to bilk Zilingo's subsidies. Executives from two firms told Bloomberg News that they decided not to back Zilingo after they found evidence of merchant fraud in Indonesia, the country that accounted for more than half of Zilingo's gross merchandise volume in financial year 2021.
There was no suggestion that Zilingo was involved in the suspected fake transactions. Some existing investors, including Burda Principal Investments, Temasek and Sofina, questioned Ms Bose about the company's unaudited financial reports, according to people familiar with the matter. But Ms Bose was providing monthly financial updates to the board, and they were lenient as Zilingo was busy with fund raising at the time, one of the people said.
In March this year, Ms Bose received an ominous text on her phone: "Storm is coming your way."
A few days later, she was asked to join a meeting with investors at Burda's shophouse office in Singapore's Boat Quay, according to people familiar with the details of the meeting. There, Mr Singh and the two other shareholders dealt her a stunner. They said Zilingo's board had received complaints about alleged mismanagement and financial misrepresentation and they were suspending her during an investigation. Mr Singh urged her to be cooperative.
"We just want to save the company," he said, according to one of the people.

Ms Bose promised to help. As she left, she started running through the pouring rain.
"I think the tale is about what sometimes happens when you go into hyper-growth mode," said Ms Aliza Knox, senior adviser at Boston Consulting Group, who has held senior management positions at tech companies including Google and Twitter in Asia Pacific.
In these situations, start-ups need to think about adding independent board members beyond "founders and funders", she said. "Could some of the problems have been mitigated if there were a different kind of board a little bit earlier? That's an important question to ask."
Zilingo is not the only Sequoia-backed start-up embroiled in controversy. BharatPe's co-founder Ashneer Grover resigned from the fast-growing Indian fintech start-up in March after senior leadership accused him of misappropriation of funds. Mr Grover has denied the accusations against him, including that he stole company money to fund an extravagant lifestyle, which he said stem from "personal hatred and low thinking", he said on LinkedIn.
A forensic team from EY India has looked into Indian social commerce start-up Trell, another Sequoia-backed company, amid allegations of financial irregularities. Trell's three co-founders did not respond to requests for comment. Co-founder and CEO Pulkit Agrawal in March sent a note to investors, questioning the nature of the forensic audit, the Economic Times reported, citing its own review of the note.
Sequoia India and South-east Asia published a blog post in April, saying it would take "proactive steps" to drive corporate governance at start-ups it invests in.
Mr Singh is feeling the heat as he evolves from start-up cheerleader to champion of corporate governance. Increased scrutiny prompted some Sequoia-backed Indian founders to compare him to a forceful ruler from Indian history.
"There is art to setting up governance - the board, process and advisers - in such a way that brakes kick in automatically when something bad happens," said Mr Dmitry Levit, founder of Singapore-based VC firm Cento Ventures. He said many of Sequoia India's companies are like racing cars. "If somebody tries to run a Formula One car on off-road terrain in stormy weather, it cannot absorb the shocks."
Sequoia India said it has always cared about corporate governance.
"Building world-class companies requires first-rate governance," a Sequoia India spokesman said in a statement to Bloomberg. "There is always more we can do to work with founders so that their companies benefit from better, more robust standards of governance, such as stronger audit oversight, clear whistle-blower processes and the need to bring independent directors on board earlier."
ac_ABz_040822.jpg


Ankiti Bose was a celebrity who crisscrossed the globe to speak at tech gatherings from Hong Kong to California. PHOTO: ZILINGO

Salary questions​

The zeal for governance may have come too late for Zilingo. About a week after Ms Bose was suspended, a board director and an adviser to another shareholder questioned her about why she was drawing a monthly salary of $50,000. Her employment contract five years ago stated it as $8,500 and the adviser had just discovered she had been making considerably more since 2019, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Ms Bose said the numbers are inaccurate but did not provide her salary information.
Investigators hired by the board also questioned her about three sets of revenue numbers for financial year 2021 that Zilingo had shared with external parties: US$190 million, US$164 million and US$140 million. Ms Bose explained to them that the US$190 million had been circulated before the year closed and before the cancellation of masks and other orders. The US$140 million was used in a due diligence report for fund raising, while the US$164 million included uninvoiced revenue, according to a document seen by Bloomberg.
But another document the company shared with a potential investor, seen by Bloomberg News, showed that Zilingo's net revenue for the year was about US$40 million. A representative for Kroll, the firm that conducted the probe, declined to comment.
Ms Bose said in an interview with Bloomberg News in May that Zilingo has used aggressive methods for recognising revenue, but that the calculations are standard practice for the industry and that all of its investors were fully aware of them. "These matters are well understood by all investors," Ms Bose said in the interview.

Zilingo "went through a tough time during Covid-19", said Mr Rohit Sipahimalani, Temasek's chief investment officer. "There were clearly some things the board was unaware of, and when there were complaints made, they investigated into it and actions have been taken subsequently."
Now, the company is in turmoil and some employees say they are worried about their future. The board in June was considering liquidating the company. After her suspension in March, Ms Bose herself filed a formal complaint to the board, asking it to also suspend Mr Kapoor and then chief operating officer Aadi Vaidya, a friend from college, for their poor work performance and lack of leadership. A representative of the company, Mr Kapoor and Mr Vaidya declined to comment. Mr Vaidya resigned last week after seven years with Zilingo, explaining "now is the time to move on, clear my head and reset priorities".
It is a steep fall for Zilingo from just five months ago, when Ms Bose's fund-raising efforts valued the company at US$1.2 billion.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Robinhood lays off 23% of staff, blaming crypto meltdown and inflation​

AK_rh_030822.jpg

The announcement followed closely on the heels of cuts in April, when Robinhood laid off 340 workers. PHOTO: REUTERS


AUG 3, 2022

NEW YORK (NYTIMES) - Robinhood, the trading app that popularised one-click trading and helped fuel last year's meme stock frenzy, said on Tuesday (Aug 2) that it was laying off about 23 per cent of its workforce.
Chief executive Vlad Tenev said in a blog post that the layoffs would affect employees across the company, especially those in operations, marketing and programme management roles.
The announcement followed closely on the heels of cuts in April, when Robinhood laid off 340 workers, or about 9 per cent of its employees at the time. Since then, Mr Tenev wrote, further worsening of the economy, including inflation and the crash of the crypto market, has "reduced customer trading activity and assets under custody".
The price of Bitcoin has fallen by more than half this year, to about US$23,000 per coin. The cryptocurrency rose as high as US$66,000 in late last year.
The layoffs come as part of a wave of job cuts at tech companies, including some cryptocurrency firms. In June, cryptocurrency exchanges including Coinbase and Gemini announced that they were laying off employees. Last week, Shopify, an online marketplace, announced it was cutting 10 per cent of its 10,000 employees.
In his memo on Tuesday, Mr Tenev said Robinhood misjudged the economy and trading activity.
"As CEO, I approved and took responsibility for our ambitious staffing trajectory - this is on me," he wrote.

The company also released its second-quarter results on Tuesday, reporting that its monthly count of active users declined to 14 million in June, a decrease of 1.9 million.
The turbulence represents a major comedown for Robinhood, which became a key player in the meme stock craze early last year, when investors banded together to drive up the stocks of companies including video game retailer GameStop and movie theatre chain AMC.
On Jan 27 last year, GameStop shares closed up nearly 1,800 per cent from a few weeks before, a record.
Then, Robinhood restricted trading in some meme stocks. The restrictions led the stocks to plunge. Lawsuits, a US Securities and Exchange Commission investigation and congressional hearings soon followed.
Robinhood's stock price soared during the meme stock trading.
On Aug 7 last year, the company was worth US$46 billion (S$63.6 billion), up about 60 per cent from its valuation a week before. But its stock has plunged 50 per cent since the beginning of the year as it continues to deal with the fallout.
The overall value of the cryptocurrency market is down to about US$1 trillion from US$3 trillion last year, when enthusiasm for crypto trading peaked and the price of Bitcoin reached a new high.
Robinhood has been working to build out its crypto arm this year, listing new coins and rolling out a crypto wallet product.
"The one thing that I liked the least about Robinhood is their crypto exposure," said Mizuho senior analyst Dan Dolev. "Anything that has no intrinsic value is always prone to problems."
Also on Tuesday, the New York State Department of Financial Services announced it was fining Robinhood's crypto operation US$30 million over violations of its anti-money-laundering and cyber-security regulations.
 

LITTLEREDDOT

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset

Sea posts $1.28b net loss in Q2, withdraws 2022 e-commerce forecast​

md_sea_17082022.jpg

The downbeat result came after Sea cut its full-year e-commerce revenue outlook in May. PHOTO: SEA LIMITED

PUBLISHED

6 HOURS AGO

FacebookTwitter

SINGAPORE (BLOOMBERG) - Shopee owner Sea posted a bigger second-quarter loss than expected and withdrew its 2022 e-commerce forecast, joining other online giants struggling to gauge an increasingly uncertain global economic outlook.
The Singapore-based company on Tuesday (Aug 16) posted an adjusted loss before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation of US$506.3 million (S$698 million) in three months to end-June, surpassing the average projection for US$482.3 million.
Sea’s net loss more than doubled to US$931.2 million (S$1.28 billion) in the June quarter, from US$433.7 million in the year-ago period, amid higher overhead costs and allowances for credit losses.
Sea shares tumbled 14 per cent on Tuesday to close at US$77.43 in New York.
The downbeat result came after Sea cut its full-year e-commerce revenue outlook in May, to a low of US$8.5 billion versus US$8.9 billion previously. Shoppers emerging from pandemic lockdowns are cutting back on online purchases, shifting towards essentials during a potential recession.
Sea, which counts Tencent Holdings as its biggest investor, has suffered a run of setbacks this year, including a sudden ban of its most popular mobile game in India and the subsequent closure of its e-commerce operations there. Its shares have fallen about 75 per cent since peaking in October.
The company has been trying to boost profitability as topline growth plateaus. Second-quarter sales rose 29 per cent to US$2.9 billion, the slowest growth in almost five years.

In South-east Asia and Taiwan, adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) loss per order for Shopee - before allocation of headquarters' common expenses - was less than 1 cent. Chief executive Forrest Li affirmed a target for the business to hit positive adjusted Ebitda before headquarters costs in Asia this year.
Second-quarter revenue from Shopee, Sea's e-commerce unit, gained 51 per cent to about US$1.7 billion versus estimates of US$1.9 billion.
Revenue from gaming arm Garena fell to US$900.3 million, slightly ahead of estimates for US$827.6 million, as hit mobile game Free Fire matures. The company said in March it expected Garena to post US$2.9 billion to US$3.1 billion in bookings in 2022, set to be its first decline.
Revenue from SeaMoney, Sea's digital financial services unit, rose to US$279 million.
Sea has been reducing its overseas footprint and slashing jobs in peripheral businesses as competition takes a toll and as it focuses more on profitability, a stark shift from its previous stance of spending for global expansion.
Shopee's gross merchandise value, the sum of transactions flowing through its platform, rose 27 per cent to US$19 billion.
Some investors are reducing their exposure to Sea. Tiger Global Management sold US$473.8 million of Sea shares, cutting its holdings after six quarters of buying, according to US Securities and Exchange Commission filings.
Altimeter Capital Management, a shareholder of Singapore-based Grab Holdings, exited Sea's Class A American depositary receipts, according to an analysis of its filings by Bloomberg News.
 
Top