• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Chitchat Hillary wins the popular vote by margin of 150,000

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Trump: 59,080,000 (approx)
Clinton: 59,230,000 (approx)

150,000 is an insignificant number out of 59 million. It is less than one percent. Most of it can be explained by people voting for Gary Johnson over Hillary Clinton.

As of now, Trump has 279 EVs and Clinton has 228 EVs. 30 EVs still in process of counting. When the tally is made, Trump will get over 300 EVs - even better than the score I predicted for him which was 299 EVs.

The Senate and the House also both belong to Republicans.
 

Patriot

Alfrescian
Loyal
usa-election-mapnov10.jpg
 

Narong Wongwan

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Popular vote thingy is useless as the US system is such it counts for nothing.
Same as stinkiepoor vile pappies got 70% of the vote but control almost 95% of the seats.
 

Thick Face Black Heart

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
Popular vote thingy is useless as the US system is such it counts for nothing.
Same as stinkiepoor vile pappies got 70% of the vote but control almost 95% of the seats.



The lefties are making it sounds like it is a big deal. 150,000 is even smaller than Ang Mo Kio GRC. Boo!

Anyway, let's see if he builds that wall as promised.
 

OrLanChowHorFun

Alfrescian
Loyal
Trump: 59,080,000 (approx)
Clinton: 59,230,000 (approx)

150,000 is an insignificant number out of 59 million. It is less than one percent. Most of it can be explained by people voting for Gary Johnson over Hillary Clinton.

As of now, Trump has 279 EVs and Clinton has 228 EVs. 30 EVs still in process of counting. When the tally is made, Trump will get over 300 EVs - even better than the score I predicted for him which was 299 EVs.

The Senate and the House also both belong to Republicans.



if not for WHOLESALE VOTER FRAUD...............Trump would have won 70% of all votes if not more...............
 

3_M

Alfrescian
Loyal
Trump: 59,080,000 (approx)
Clinton: 59,230,000 (approx)

150,000 is an insignificant number out of 59 million. It is less than one percent. Most of it can be explained by people voting for Gary Johnson over Hillary Clinton.

As of now, Trump has 279 EVs and Clinton has 228 EVs. 30 EVs still in process of counting. When the tally is made, Trump will get over 300 EVs - even better than the score I predicted for him which was 299 EVs.

The Senate and the House also both belong to Republicans.

It still a near 50-50 situation with Clinton having that slight advantage in terms of number of supporters.

The media which is overwhelmingly pro clinton might had painted a overly rosy picture of Clinton winning prospect that it breeds complacency. In such a half fight situation, the candidate that can get his or her likely voters to vote will likely win.
 
Last edited:

Devil Within

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Trump: 59,080,000 (approx)
Clinton: 59,230,000 (approx)

150,000 is an insignificant number out of 59 million. It is less than one percent. Most of it can be explained by people voting for Gary Johnson over Hillary Clinton.

As of now, Trump has 279 EVs and Clinton has 228 EVs. 30 EVs still in process of counting. When the tally is made, Trump will get over 300 EVs - even better than the score I predicted for him which was 299 EVs.

The Senate and the House also both belong to Republicans.

That means there are 150,000 more retards in USA. Only an idiot would vote for a corrupted lying politician.
If they want to go about popular vote, Communist Bernie Sanders should be the one running on Democrats side and not crooked Hillary.

Black Guy Reacts To Donald Trump Elected 45th President of the United States
[video=youtube;4-spM-Abm8c]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-spM-Abm8c&t=0s[/video]
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The popular vote thingy in this type of elections (via electoral college) does not mean much as candidates plan/campaign according to the system. Here it means more emphasis on getting states with bigger electoral votes .

If voting is based on popular votes, then emphasis will switch to getting areas/states with more voters- eg Urban Areas as about 82% of Americans are urban residents..
I believe Trump will change his strategy accordingly (eg appeal more to Hispanics/Latino/Americans-no Mexican wall ) and still win .
 

winnipegjets

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Trump: 59,080,000 (approx)
Clinton: 59,230,000 (approx)

150,000 is an insignificant number out of 59 million. It is less than one percent. Most of it can be explained by people voting for Gary Johnson over Hillary Clinton.

As of now, Trump has 279 EVs and Clinton has 228 EVs. 30 EVs still in process of counting. When the tally is made, Trump will get over 300 EVs - even better than the score I predicted for him which was 299 EVs.

The Senate and the House also both belong to Republicans.

Trump will make 2017 and 2018 exciting years. He is going to create headaches for many governments.
 

flatearther

Alfrescian
Loyal
Trump: 59,080,000 (approx)
Clinton: 59,230,000 (approx)

150,000 is an insignificant number out of 59 million.
The popular vote numbers have increased by about a million each for both candidates:
nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/president
edition.cnn.com/election/results
and Hillary is now leading by nearly 400,000 popular votes.


As of now, Trump has 279 EVs and Clinton has 228 EVs.
NBC has finally projected Trump to win Arizona (11 EVs):
nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/AZ
so Trump is now projected to win 290 EVs.
 
Last edited:

Reddog

Alfrescian
Loyal
Trump: 59,080,000 (approx)
Clinton: 59,230,000 (approx)

150,000 is an insignificant number out of 59 million. It is less than one percent. Most of it can be explained by people voting for Gary Johnson over Hillary Clinton.

As of now, Trump has 279 EVs and Clinton has 228 EVs. 30 EVs still in process of counting. When the tally is made, Trump will get over 300 EVs - even better than the score I predicted for him which was 299 EVs.

The Senate and the House also both belong to Republicans.

No use. All these 150,000 votes are in states that she already won with huge majorities. Useless.
 

flatearther

Alfrescian
Loyal
The lefties are making it sounds like it is a big deal. 150,000 is even smaller than Ang Mo Kio GRC. Boo!
It still a near 50-50 situation with Clinton having that slight advantage in terms of number of supporters.
If my calculations are correct, there are still nearly ten million votes that have not been counted/published yet:
nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/president
abcnews.go.com/Politics/Election
edition.cnn.com/election/results/president

2016 National Popular Vote Tracker
google.com/spreadsheets/d/133Eb4qQmOxNvtesw2hdVns073R68EZx4SfCnP4IGQf8/htmlview
 
Last edited:

Devil Within

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Why do we have the electoral college? via @Liz_Wheeler

[video=youtube;W2lKIPTsaLM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2lKIPTsaLM&t=0s[/video]
 
Top