"shown" or "proved"?
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
An open letter to fellow Christians
- Thread starter Confuseous
- Start date
this is called "play victim" laah.... last time my smallest daughter very good with it
One much-quoted study, that shows the role of epigenetics in determining not just sexual orientation, but also virilization and feminization in the foetus:
http://www.nimbios.org/press/FS_homosexuality
I understood your question, but you misunderstood my reply: why talk about age? I'd rather talk about other things, eating ice-cream for instance. Or what constitutes a crime in Singapore.
Too much space in between your ears, issit?
You can talk about age, I cannot talk about crime meh?
Dear Scroobal,
There is a basic question of rights all the way up from 377(a) to Gay Marriage. I am in favour of the repeal of 377(a) but less on the issue of Gay Marriage, vet for what its worth both sides are now fighting tooth and nail on every point within that spectrum because any lost in the view of the other means a total lost on that spectrum.
Scroo. The problem with societal norms is that it evolves, the compromise as suggested by the PM over 377(a) was that we keep it to appease the conservatives but WE WILL NOT prosecute actively.
Well the acts of two consenting adults proved it otherwise and someone in AGC did not read the memo leading to this current batch of law suits and HEIGHTENED LGBT campaign.
Lets be clear the Conservative rights have been more than GULTY of an absolutely horrendous aggressive agenda including the AWARE saga. There was bound somewhat to be a push back from GAYS and those who support gay right.
Locke
There is a basic question of rights all the way up from 377(a) to Gay Marriage. I am in favour of the repeal of 377(a) but less on the issue of Gay Marriage, vet for what its worth both sides are now fighting tooth and nail on every point within that spectrum because any lost in the view of the other means a total lost on that spectrum.
Scroo. The problem with societal norms is that it evolves, the compromise as suggested by the PM over 377(a) was that we keep it to appease the conservatives but WE WILL NOT prosecute actively.
Well the acts of two consenting adults proved it otherwise and someone in AGC did not read the memo leading to this current batch of law suits and HEIGHTENED LGBT campaign.
Lets be clear the Conservative rights have been more than GULTY of an absolutely horrendous aggressive agenda including the AWARE saga. There was bound somewhat to be a push back from GAYS and those who support gay right.
Locke
Too long and pretentious when the basic point of this faggot is that society must support and condone faggotism and that insidious faggot propaganda, slyly disguised as "children's literature" and targeted at impressionable children, be allowed.
BTW, why is there no "open letter" to the 516,000+ strong Muslim community condemning Islam for its no-nonsense approach to faggotism? Why only gungho "open letters", facebook postings, etc criticizing and condemning the 606,000+ Christians???
Debauched faggots are always screeching about "discrimination", "fairness", etc.
Can't buttfuck - NOT FAIR!!! Can't marry each other - NOT FAIR!!! Can't donate blood - NOT FAIR!!! Can't whatever - NOT FAIR!!!
Surely this is an excellent time for faggots to show the larger community what "non-discrimination" and "fairness" mean. No?
The debauched faggots can do so by not discriminating against Christians and be fair to them by condemning the Singapore Muslims community and Islam for Islam's no-nonsense stand against faggotism with the same passion, vigour and stridency they have done so for the Singapore Christian community.
Over to you faggots.
Last edited:
For fuck sake, get a grip on yourselves. With all the buttfucking faggots engage in, I would have thought faggots would know how to grip themselves very well and not elevate their promiscuity, debauchery and voracious sexual appetites for buttholes to that of the fights for universal suffrage, abolition of slavery, apartheid, etc. Please get real.
Precisely. And what goes on between those 2 consensual adults should stay in the privacy of their bedroom and not agitated for in the public arena. Take it to the public arena and please expect a very public and tit-for-tat response. Don't play victims when that happens.
my comment was in response to your >>What goes on between 2 consensual adults and which does not harm others is fine by me.<<
so why so uptight about age? why only adults huuh?
Last edited:
aiyooh again i was referencing to your >>What goes on between 2 consensual adults and which does not harm others is fine by me.<< so of course no crime is concern.
or this is the start of your twisting & turning by talking about something unrelated altogether?
Last edited:
My what?? Your few brain cells just zonked out, issit? Sniffing too many arses, must be. LOL.
And when was I uptight about age? Your Pappy masters set age of consent to 18, I didn't set it, so go ask them.
Sheez, the quality of PAP IB is deteriorating by the day.
</what>
No crime? Which planet you from? Have you heard of Section 377A of the Penal Code?
I noticed you edited and filled in the blanks. Finally woke up from your ass-sniffing? LOL.
the research "result" has been proven?
i only know some cases of previous "pink" people becoming normal and vice versa so looks like "pinkness" is not as inborn as you would like it to be.
Which group will burn more in hell ?
L,G,B or T ?
There is one more letter that the faggots forgot, "I" for intergender. Hence, it is LGBTI.
The ones we should be sympathetic to and help out are the "Is" and the "Ts". They are the ones who are truly born the way they are, either physically or with gender identity problems. The Intergenders are born with both male and physical characteristics, male penis with female ovaries, scrotums that look like vulvas, etc. One example is the South African runner, Caster Semenya. Transgenders are basically females trapped in male bodies and vice versa (think Thai ladyboys). They try to fix their problems by working and saving to undergo sex change operations.
The LGB (Lesbians, Gays and Bisexuals) are the ones who need to be dealt with forcefully, without any mercy and with gloves off. They are the ones I refer to when I use the term faggots. Think Vincent Wijeysingha, Alex Lau, those two faggots represented by that bipolar faggot who are currently fighting to have their buttfucking legitimised and those feminist butches from AWARE.
They are the militant ones, the ones who are demanding for the right to marry each other, the redefinition of families as that comprising two fathers, two mothers, etc. They are pushy, aggressive and manipulative but like to play the victim and discrimination card when they are shown up or called out. They are constantly trying to shove their promiscuous and debauched lifestyles down the throats of everyone. They males claim they have no sexual attraction for women and can only fuck men but go on to use men's buttholes as pseudo-vaginas. The females claim they have no sexual attraction for men but go on to use strapons with pseudo penises (dildos ) attached.
These debauched faggots like to rely on inconclusive and disputed studies to claim they are "born like that" and are born with the "gay gene". So God knows how come the Bs (Bisexuals) amongst them want to fuck both men and women if they are truly born with that magical "gay gene" or why they need to rely on buttholes and strapsons as pseudo-vaginas and pseudo penises.
Last edited:
seems like you are embarrassingly desperate to reply me.... replying my every post before i had time myself to amend my mistakes..... scarry.My what?? Your few brain cells just zonked out, issit? Sniffing too many arses, must be. LOL.
And when was I uptight about age? Your Pappy masters set age of consent to 18, I didn't set it, so go ask them.
Sheez, the quality of PAP IB is deteriorating by the day.
</what>
what 377a, abcd or 9876?
i was extending your lame attempt to normalize "pinkness" which is >>What goes on between 2 consensual adults and which does not harm others is fine by me.<< to man can do it with another married woman who is not his wife, woman doing it with her biological son.
so do you condone both?
You escaping my question again. Why 94% white cannot convert 6% pink, but lagi scared 6% pink convert 94% white? LOL.
Which part of my reply you don't understand, twit?
1. Adultery. Not a crime. PAP approved.
2. Incest. Crime. PAP not approved.
So ask your masters in white (MIW) why (1) approved, (2) not approved. I don't lay down the laws, dickhead.
Similar threads
