Watch at 03.16 of this video............
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/video/crash-barrier-failed-to/1026470.html
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/video/crash-barrier-failed-to/1026470.html
-
IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here. The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.
Hri Kumar does not know the difference between "Ordnance" and "Ordinance"
- Thread starter cheesecake
- Start date
Why? Even the Prime Minister does know know english. Look at the example below. Gay Loong should not use the word "elected" in this context. He is already elected to his office. The right word to use is "re-elected". When the PAP is re-elected, not when the PAP is elected. Fuck, send the idiot to Cambridge, and he still bastardise the english language.
SINGAPORE : Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said when elected, the People's Action Party (PAP) will have enough talent to form the nucleus of next generation leaders.
At the party's conference on Sunday, six young party members took to the stage to speak on what they wanted for their country.
Party members have been told that they will have to work harder ahead of the next General Election (GE) as more seats are likely to be contested.
It's the clearest indication yet that the party has found itself a good slate of potential candidates.
As PM Lee puts it, it is critical not just for the party but also for Singapore. That's because the country's next prime minister and a core team of leaders should be people in their 30s and 40s.
SINGAPORE : Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said when elected, the People's Action Party (PAP) will have enough talent to form the nucleus of next generation leaders.
At the party's conference on Sunday, six young party members took to the stage to speak on what they wanted for their country.
Party members have been told that they will have to work harder ahead of the next General Election (GE) as more seats are likely to be contested.
It's the clearest indication yet that the party has found itself a good slate of potential candidates.
As PM Lee puts it, it is critical not just for the party but also for Singapore. That's because the country's next prime minister and a core team of leaders should be people in their 30s and 40s.
Another one is Tharmbi, inventor of the word untransparent to describe Temasick's operations.
The opposite of Transparent is opaque and not untransparent. Therefore, you cannot say that "Temasek is not untransparent". It should be "Temasek is not opaque" 5 years as Minister of Education, and he still can't put together a sentence in English. Maybe the taxpayers need to increase his pay so he can take some english lessons.
The opposite of Transparent is opaque and not untransparent. Therefore, you cannot say that "Temasek is not untransparent". It should be "Temasek is not opaque" 5 years as Minister of Education, and he still can't put together a sentence in English. Maybe the taxpayers need to increase his pay so he can take some english lessons.
At least this Ah Neh MP is not as bad as Chris de Souza. That bugger even quoted the wrong section of a law and he did so in Parliament. Worse, the incompetent and lazy bumps who put together the Parliamentary Reports (Hansard) did not detect the error and it is now permanently in the records of the legislative arm of this Little Red Dot.
The link is here: http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/report.jsp?currentPubID=00004764-WA
Let me elaborate:
1) On 25th August 2008, Parliament debated "Acquittals of Accused and Presumption of Innocence". At column 2988 of the report (see link), it is recorded that Chris de Souza said: "First, if we take the argument on the issue of cost to its logical conclusion, would the Minister then think it is acceptable for a defence counsel, whose client has been found guilty by the Court of Final Appeal to say publicly that his client could be factually innocent and, therefore, need not have to pay cost? This is possibly a real issue because under section 401 of the CPC, prosecution can request cost."
2) Section 401 of the CPC has nothing to do with costs. Instead, it deals with the High Court's powers on revision.
3) The correct section should be Section 355(1) which states:
"The court before which a person is convicted of an offence may, in its discretion and if satisfied that the defence of the person was conducted in an extravagant and unnecessary manner, order that person to pay a sum to be fixed by the court by way of costs of his prosecution."
:oIo:
Chris de Souza's particulars can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_de_Souza
The link is here: http://sprs.parl.gov.sg/search/report.jsp?currentPubID=00004764-WA
Let me elaborate:
1) On 25th August 2008, Parliament debated "Acquittals of Accused and Presumption of Innocence". At column 2988 of the report (see link), it is recorded that Chris de Souza said: "First, if we take the argument on the issue of cost to its logical conclusion, would the Minister then think it is acceptable for a defence counsel, whose client has been found guilty by the Court of Final Appeal to say publicly that his client could be factually innocent and, therefore, need not have to pay cost? This is possibly a real issue because under section 401 of the CPC, prosecution can request cost."
2) Section 401 of the CPC has nothing to do with costs. Instead, it deals with the High Court's powers on revision.
3) The correct section should be Section 355(1) which states:
"The court before which a person is convicted of an offence may, in its discretion and if satisfied that the defence of the person was conducted in an extravagant and unnecessary manner, order that person to pay a sum to be fixed by the court by way of costs of his prosecution."
:oIo:Chris de Souza's particulars can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_de_Souza
Last edited:
his boss doesnt know mee siam mai hum doesnt exist.
hearsay the Istana cook make special dishes and recipes.
It could be available in Istana and no where else. Old fart Long think hawker center also served this and he made a flip.
It could be available in Istana and no where else. Old fart Long think hawker center also served this and he made a flip.
A few hundred billions of our reserves lost in bad investment. Yet the PAP claims that it is managing our reserves well. Is that deception, stupidity or ignorance?
All these are clowns.
Hri Kumar is "senior" counsel?
And that idiot Chris - he expressed amazement a couple of years back about the sleaze in Tg Pagar - and he is one of the MPs for the GRC?
Hri Kumar is "senior" counsel?
And that idiot Chris - he expressed amazement a couple of years back about the sleaze in Tg Pagar - and he is one of the MPs for the GRC?
they only cooked the dish after his gaffe to try to save face.
too high class for these PAP elites who gorge on the finest food.
Similar threads
