This is what your article says:"There are two different types of amino acids-as of all organic molecules-called "left-handed" and "right-handed."
And this is what the scientist of my article actually says -"every amino acid this planet uses as its biological Lego can exist in a right-handed or a left-handed form and would spontaneously form either one at identical odds, but every speck of life on this planet uses only the left-handed version."
Don't try to distort the scientist's words by chopping off the last few words.
That is downright despicable of YOU! You are just a living Thug with no integrity, worst than a typical hypocritical christian. Since you want to claim that, you ask your scientist then.
Wow, you don't really understand the content of your article and you dare to post it here? OMG! Scientists can't be so muddled head just because you are. Now, show us where in my article, the scientist has said what you are trying very hard to claim?
PS: I am disappointed that Psalm23 did not come in to cheer you.:( I guess he needs to 'saved' his own ass first, Christ 2nd and you probably last.
Now, produce your MEAT for my original question. Remember, I ask that first since you want to play that game. The question still remain the same. Where is the standard you just set? Gone?
"Why the Creator or ID prefers left-handed amino acids and right-handed sugars?"
Answer it! You can't evade this time
You seem to have a horrible habit of 'pot calling the kettle black"! You accuse others of "downright despicable....and thug with no integrity." And are you one of these too?
Let's face it....Christians or non-Christians, we all no angels....me included. So, get out from the habit of pot calling the kettle black.
Let's come to the main topic.....The Theory of Evolution (which rightly should now be known as The Theory of Devolution since this theory is fully supportable by latest scientific data).
Below is a latest article written by medical experts from purely medical and scientific stanpoint. What we all now know is that mutation is now the greatest threats to medical problems. Like all human inventions, antibiotics were just good only for 'a season'. Many other inventions, in fact, I am bold enough to say that more than 90% of human inventions would finally end up with more serious problems that what those inventions were trying to fix in the first place.
The drug-resistant bacteria due to antibiotics is a concrete proof that mutation can never ever create anything better. You may have one or two so-called 'positive-mutation' that is 'beneficial' to mankind but the ratio of these so-called 'positive-mutation' to 'negative-mutation' is 1:100,000,000 (or even greater)!
It has been acknowledged by geneticists that at the rate of mutation of human cells after each reproduction, it is a matter of time human will be extinct because the mutation of the cells after each reproduction will render many other cells useless or defective. If you care to read more, just go and google for this topics and they are articles written by scientists with no religious attachment. So, how could evolution takes place because the main premise of evolutions are: mutation plus time!
Read the following article and just conclude yourself, and always remain yourself what God has told you: A fool in his heart has said that there is no God (Psalm 14:1; Psalm 53:1).
Antibiotic resistance 'poses catastrophic threat'
By Peter Russell
WebMD UK Health News
Medically Reviewed by Dr Sheena Meredith
11th March 2013 - Patients face a heightened risk of dying from even the most routine surgery in 20 years unless global action is taken to combat the growing threat of antibiotic resistance.
The warning comes in the second part of the Chief Medical Officer's annual report which examines the threat posed by antimicrobial resistance and infectious diseases.
Antibiotics have been widely used in medicine over the last 70 years to treat bacterial infections. In recent years it has become apparent that widespread use has led to antibiotic resistance and the prospect that some once potent types of antibiotic will be rendered useless.
For instance, penicillin is no longer effective for staphylococcal wound infections, while the synthetic antibiotic ciprofloxacin is now powerless against gonorrhoea. The value of many more antibiotics are under threat.
'Discovery void'
Calling for politicians to treat the threat as seriously as the MRSA bug, the Chief Medical Officer for England, Professor Dame Sally Davies, highlights a 'discovery void', with few new antibiotics in production. It means that, while new infectious diseases are found every year, few new antibiotics have been developed in the last two decades.
Experts say that the pharmaceutical industry is no longer geared up to produce new antibiotics so that, as a result, doctors now may have to fall back on 'reserve' antibiotics which may not be as effective or may have more side-effects.
The Chief Medical Officer is calling for the development of new drugs to be encouraged, while the life of the remaining stock of antibiotics should be prolonged by using better hygiene methods to reduce infections, prescribing fewer antibiotics and making sure they are only prescribed when needed.
Infection risks
In a statement, Dame Sally says: "Antimicrobial resistance poses a catastrophic threat. If we don’t act now, any one of us could go into hospital in 20 years for minor surgery and die because of an ordinary infection that can’t be treated by antibiotics. And routine operations like hip replacements or organ transplants could be deadly because of the risk of infection.
“That’s why governments and organisations across the world, including the World Health Organization and G8, need to take this seriously."
Action plan
The Department of Health says it will soon publish the UK Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy setting out how it will meet the challenge that the Chief Medical Officer has outlined. The five year plan will:
• Champion the responsible use of antibiotics - by ensuring NHS staff have the skills, knowledge and training to prescribe and administer antibiotics appropriately. Part of this will include reviewing and updating the curricula for medical undergraduates
• Strengthen surveillance - by improving the recording of data on the numbers of antibiotics prescribed and trends in antibiotic resistance, this information can used by clinicians to change patterns of prescribing. This will help reduce the level of resistance and help ensure patients respond to treatments
• Encourage the development of new diagnostics, therapeutics and antibiotics, for example by continuing to support the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI) and other initiatives that encourage scientific research
• Derek Butler, chair of MRSA Action UK, tells us that increasing production costs are behind the lack of new antibiotics coming on to the market. "When you consider it can cost anywhere between five hundred million and one thousand million pounds to develop a single antimicrobial, and then it has probably a shelf life of 10 years before the bacteria build up enough resistance to make them virtually useless, there isn't the money now in these types of drugs for the pharmaceutical companies to get the return on their investments."
• Mr Butler says one possible solution would be to extend the licences awarded to pharmaceutical companies for medications that they can make money on so that they can afford to invest in producing new antibiotics. "It's about governments and pharmaceutical companies around the world working together," he adds.
Chao kuan kam sai kai, eat own shit.
Still cannot prove anything. Chao kuan yao siu kia.:(
OMG!
