• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Doctor: No evidence of sodomy

hornytan

Alfrescian
Loyal
Beh Lih Yi and P Tarani | Jul 28, 08 1:36pm
http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/86834

There is no evidence that Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan was sodomised, according to the doctor who examined him four hours before he lodged a police report alleging he was sexually assaulted by PKR
MCPX
leader Anwar Ibrahim.

saiful bukhari azlan brickfields police station 030708It is believed that Anwar's former aide Saiful (left) went to two different hospitals on June 28 - the day he lodged the police report claiming that he was sodomised by his ex-boss.

He first went to Hospital Pusrawi (Pusat Rawatan Islam) in Jalan Tun Razak - a government-linked Islamic medical institution - at about 2pm.

According to a copy of the medical report obtained by malaysiakini yesterday, Saiful went to the hospital complaining of 'tenesmus' - a medical term for difficulty and pain in passing motion.

He was examined by Dr Mohamed Osman Abdul Hamid, the medical officer on duty.

The doctor said that the patient had alleged he was assaulted by the intrusion of a piece of "plastic" in the anus.

Mohamed Osman, according to his medical report which was recorded at 2.14pm, found "zero active bleeding", "zero ulcer or pus", "zero tear and scar" in Saiful's anus.

He also stated that Saiful appeared "alert", "comfortable", "not pale" and did not show any fever symptoms.

A senior Pusrawi official told malaysiakini this morning that the hospital had launched an internal investigation on how Saiful's medical report was leaked.

When malaysiakini showed him a copy of the report, he refused to return it saying, "It's our document."

A check at the emergency unit where Mohamed Osman is attached revealed that he has taken leave since last week.

Meanwhile, Pusrawi general manager Wan Mahmood Wan Yaacob refused to comment on the matter.

Conflicting medical reports

Mohamed Osman, in his report's concluding remarks, advised Saiful to go to a government hospital so as "to rule out" assault and sodomy.

At 6pm on that day, Saiful went to Hospital Kuala Lumpur for his second medical examination. He subsequently lodged a report against Anwar at the police beat at the hospital.

According to an expert who has dealt with rape and sodomy cases, the victim must provide a second medical examination in a government hospital.

She said the court will only accept evidence from a government hospital but the first medical examination must collaborate with the second report, otherwise this could be challenged during the trial.

"From the report, the doctor had failed to find any evidence to support the patient's complaint. That was why he asked the patient to go to a government hospital to conclusively rule out assault or sodomy," said the expert who requested anonymity.

It is learnt that the police have recorded statements from Mohamed Osman after Saiful lodged the report against Anwar.

The doctor was said to be under tremendous stress as a result of the police interrogation and was advised by the hospital to take leave.

Mohamed Osman, a Burmese Muslim, has 20 years of experience as a doctor. He previously worked in government hospitals before joining Pusrawi about a year ago.

Efforts by malaysiakini to contact Saiful has not been successful.
 

linnaohia1

Alfrescian
Loyal
We will never know the truth. Whether he was checked or not that is.
There are so many shady things going across the causeway that whatever comes out in the papers are all hearsay and nothing more ...
 

Adidas

Alfrescian
Loyal
it is very difficult for us,ordinary people to know all about it.
this is part of those political's game that they play.

why can't they just concentrate on making their economic good and really take care of their citizen. :confused:
 

alfarian

New Member
I personally don't think that Anwar has done it or put it simply, can he do it. He's already 60+. Can his little bro be as stiff enough as to be able to shove into a 20+ guy's ARSE???
 

xdecepticon

Alfrescian
Loyal
I personally don't think that Anwar has done it or put it simply, can he do it. He's already 60+. Can his little bro be as stiff enough as to be able to shove into a 20+ guy's ARSE???

Nowadays got viagra/ tongkat ali. Anyway, I am not suggesting anything here. Politics are real dirt to the core!
 

ezez11

Alfrescian
Loyal
I think he is innocent. However, it is a politcal game. It is difficult to predict outcome.

Nevertheless, today Anwar is different from 8 years ago, now he become popular internationally.
 

wodemama

Alfrescian
Loyal
yea, its all politics.

scary thing to have. even in school already can cause a big hoo-haa not to mention such a big stage
 

starless

Alfrescian
Loyal
Looking at the situation, who knows whether the allegations are true or not except the Anwar n the victim and of course all the power player .... I suppose like the previous case, even though Anwar has been declared innocence, who knows ...
 

jetaime

Alfrescian
Loyal
With Anwar running in by election ... think they might just charge him and see how ... else if Anwar come into power and start getting more support, and maybe get majority votes , all the people involved in graft (all the Umno politicians :smile: ) will be in trouble ...
 

denzuko1

Alfrescian
Loyal
Looking at the situation, who knows whether the allegations are true or not except the Anwar n the victim and of course all the power player .... I suppose like the previous case, even though Anwar has been declared innocence, who knows ...

Question is not whether he did it or not, the simple fact is that it does not really matters because everyone has their own preferences. Saiful if he actually did let Anwar in ( many many times ) is more of a willing partner who was dumped and try to take revenge.

Will being a homo reduces one's capability in doing his job? A town in India even voted in a transexual and he/she did a better job than normal politicians in serving the people.

I am very sure that there are more than Anwar in Malaysia who would go for other men's arse. The purpose of them charging Anwar only is purely political.
 

SAMURAISAN

Alfrescian
Loyal
In Matland, consensual sodomy is also a crime.

If there is indeed sodomy committed, then Saiful should also be arrested. The act cannot be anything but consensual. Consider...

1. Saiful is a young man and Anwar is in his 60s. Couldn't Saiful fend off a 60 year old guy?

2. The medical report found no evidence of trauma...which strongly indicates consensual bumfucking where some lubrication was used...if indeed it happened.

3. There was also no evidence on Saiful of any struggle...which is inevitable if he has to fight off someone trying to bumfuck him.

So it wasn't rape..as implied in the charges against Anwar.

So why isn't Saiful also charged for consensual sodomy?
 

Porfirio Rubirosa

Alfrescian
Loyal
From the charge brought against Anwar today, it appears that this was indeed a case of alleged consenual buggery. Now must wait for Saiful's yarns:p

BTW, the good doctor apparently affirmed a statutory declaration earlier this month confirming his medical report that Saiful had not been buggered when he examined him. Wonder if he shall do a PI Bala U-TURN:biggrin:

In Matland, consensual sodomy is also a crime.

If there is indeed sodomy committed, then Saiful should also be arrested. The act cannot be anything but consensual. Consider...

1. Saiful is a young man and Anwar is in his 60s. Couldn't Saiful fend off a 60 year old guy?

2. The medical report found no evidence of trauma...which strongly indicates consensual bumfucking where some lubrication was used...if indeed it happened.

3. There was also no evidence on Saiful of any struggle...which is inevitable if he has to fight off someone trying to bumfuck him.

So it wasn't rape..as implied in the charges against Anwar.

So why isn't Saiful also charged for consensual sodomy?
 
Top