• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Australia at No 2: Second best country to live in the world

wendypoh

Alfrescian
Loyal
All those criticism about Australia may turn out to be false, put out by Singaporeans who don't want Singaporean to enjoy the good life in Australia. If you disagree, you are disputing the United Nations quality of life list :p

Norway is top on the list
Australia is second :biggrin:


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33178495/ns/world_news/

And the best country to live in is ...

Norway tops U.N. quality-of-life list; U.S. is 13th, while Niger finishes last

BANGKOK - Norway enjoys the world's highest quality of life, while Niger suffers the lowest, a U.N. agency said Monday, as it released a ranking that highlights the wide disparities in well-being between rich and poor countries.

The annual Human Development Index, unveiled in Bangkok by the United Nations Development Program, takes into account life expectancy, literacy, school enrollment and per capita gross domestic product in 182 countries.

"A child born in Niger can expect to live to just over 50 years, which is 30 years less than a child born in Norway. Furthermore, the differences in per capita income are huge for every dollar earned per person in Niger, US$85 are earned in Norway," UNDP said.

Norway was followed by Australia and Iceland on the list, which drew on statistics dating from 2007, before Iceland was hit hard in global economic crisis. Afghanistan and Sierra Leone rounded out the bottom of the ranking.

The United States was listed 13th.

Life getting better in China, Iran and Nepal

Trends in the index since 1980 showed an average improvement of 15 percent in countries' scores. The greatest long-term improvements have been shown by China, Iran and Nepal, but progress has been concentrated in education and health rather than income, said the U.N agency.

Afghanistan is new to the list this year — reliable statistics were not previously available — but otherwise leaders and laggards are largely the same.

However, five countries rose three or more places — China, Colombia, France, Peru and Venezuela — while seven countries dropped more than two places — Belize, Ecuador, Jamaica, Lebanon, Luxembourg, Malta, and Tonga.

The index was released as part of the UNDP's annual Human Development Report, which this year highlighted migration.

"Most migrants, internal and international, reap gains in the form of higher incomes, better access to education and health and improved prospects for their children," said the report. "These gains often directly benefit family members who stay behind as well as countries of origin indirectly."

It also suggested that as the populations age in developed countries, they could benefit from increased migration to boost their work forces.

But it cautioned that encouraging migration should not substitute for "efforts by developing countries to achieve growth and improve human well-being."
 

borom

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The Ranking poses several questions

1. Why should a country ranked 23rd pay its ministers the highest salary
in the world.
? Remuneration must be tied to performance and by right
the Norwegian Ministers should be the best paid.

2. Can a country ranked 23rd be called world class?

3. Will the ST highlight(later on) details like the worrying and widening
income inequalities in this place where the poorest 10% share (of income
or expenditure ) is 1.9% compared to the richest 10% share of 32.8%-
giving a ratio of 17.7X (compared to Japan's 4.5 ,Korea's 7.8, Brunei's 7.3,
Malaysia's 11 (See pg 195 of Report). Do we vote for them to make the
rich ,richer and poor, poorer?

Others may want to peruse further and highlight interesting info here as I doubt we can rely on our controlled media to do that.

http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2009_EN_Complete.pdf
 

axe168

Alfrescian
Loyal
All those criticism about Australia may turn out to be false, put out by Singaporeans who don't want Singaporean to enjoy the good life in Australia. If you disagree, you are disputing the United Nations quality of life list :p

Norway is top on the list
Australia is second :biggrin:

Thank you Wendy..
 

Don Muthuswamy

Alfrescian
Loyal
All those criticism about Australia may turn out to be false, put out by Singaporeans who don't want Singaporean to enjoy the good life in Australia. If you disagree, you are disputing the United Nations quality of life list :p

Norway is top on the list
Australia is second :biggrin:


."

I just don't get it. You have always maintained a negative stance against migrating to Canada while supporting the dot. But to your point, yes. maybe there are some sour grapes around or they may have some ulterior motives.
 
Top