• IP addresses are NOT logged in this forum so there's no point asking. Please note that this forum is full of homophobes, racists, lunatics, schizophrenics & absolute nut jobs with a smattering of geniuses, Chinese chauvinists, Moderate Muslims and last but not least a couple of "know-it-alls" constantly sprouting their dubious wisdom. If you believe that content generated by unsavory characters might cause you offense PLEASE LEAVE NOW! Sammyboy Admin and Staff are not responsible for your hurt feelings should you choose to read any of the content here.

    The OTHER forum is HERE so please stop asking.

Sinkie stroke victim divorces his sinkie wife --- it's a fate worse than death!

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
Hubby to pay wife $2m

By Amanda Phua

20111009.175114_hubby_np1.jpg


The New Paper
Monday, Oct 10, 2011


Her husband would abuse her physically and verbally, she said.

After he had a stroke in 2005, he even forced himself on her several times.

If she refused his sexual advances, he would kick her off the bed.

The woman, 60, filed for divorce in November 2008.

Recently, the couple went to court over the division of the matrimonial assets.

Following a hearing in the High Court, Justice Lai Siu Chiu ordered that the man, 64, pay his wife $2 million.

Their matrimonial home, a condominium unit in Hillview Avenue, is valued at $850,000.

It is to be sold and the woman will receive 60 per cent of the proceeds, which would form part of the $2 million awarded.

In addition, he was also ordered to pay her a lump sum of $20,000 for maintenance.

Her husband is appealing against the decision.

The court was told that the couple married on Oct 2, 1979 and they have a son, 31, who is now married.

About five years before their marriage, the woman left her factory operator job to help out in his company, which sold and serviced fire-fighting equipment.

In addition to her administrative duties, she had to service about 20 fire extinguishers daily.

Two staff were initially hired to help her but the couple stopped hiring in the late 1990s due to high staff turnover.

The woman said that in the three decades that she worked for her husband, she did not receive any salary or allowances.

Justice Lai noted the sums of money her husband gave her were "on a needs basis, for the shop, household and family expenses".

The woman also said that her husband rarely helped out in the business while she dedicated herself to working on weekdays and a half day on Saturdays.

She also managed the household alone, with her husband refusing to help.

In terms of raising their child, the man played with their son occasionally and would chauffeur him to and from school during his son's younger years.

"(She) took care of the son in every other aspect," said Justice Lai.

After his stroke, the couple employed a maid to assist in caring for the man.

Besides managing the business, the woman made twice-daily trips to visit her husband when he was hospitalised.

On the other hand, the man hardly helped out at the shop, even before his stroke.

Their son testified that his father would take a nap after lunch, and when he was at the office in the evening, he would read newspapers while waiting for his mother to end work before going home.

He refuted his father's claims that his mother's contributions were unimportant.

The company closed in August 2005, some three months after he suffered a stroke.

In arriving at her decision, Justice Lai took into consideration the fact that the husband had been "uncooperative and evasive" in revealing the full extent of his assets.

Undisclosed assets

The woman had presented documents proving that he had undisclosed assets such as bank accounts and investments of more than $4 million.

The man claimed that he had lost money in his investments.

He had sold some of them and used his savings to pay for "household expenses, maid salary and levy as well as the maintenance fees, property tax etc for the matrimonial property".

However, Justice Lai was not convinced.

She noted that a total of $116,203.97 was withdrawn from two of the bank accounts disclosed by the man after their divorce, leaving $1,892.90.

Justice Lai thus inferred that he was "dissipating assets from the matrimonial pool to prevent the wife from getting her fair share".

The $2 million awarded to the wife was slightly less than 35 per cent of the overall assets available for division.

Justice Lai also ordered that the wife be in charge of selling their condo.

If the husband does not pay up, her solicitors can retain his share of the proceeds.
 

red amoeba

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
who in a sane mind will be 'cooperative' in revealing full extent of assets esp in a divorce case? What a stupid observation from the Judge.
 

Rogue Trader

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The wife should be happy her stroke patient ah lau still wants to ups her at 54 years old.. Which man won't kick this ungrateful woman off the bed??
 

streetsmart73

Alfrescian (InfP)
Generous Asset
who in a sane mind will be 'cooperative' in revealing full extent of assets esp in a divorce case? What a stupid observation from the Judge.


hi there


1. red, the judge in attention is another woman mah!
2. local male sheep here really sucks big time.
3. there is literally no win-win situation.
4. even if the woman is some slut, the guy is made to pay!
 
Last edited:

Unrepented

Alfrescian
Loyal
:confused: If husband really CBL and rarely helped out in the biz, then why got to close after he kenna stroke :confused::confused:

Hubby to pay wife $2m

By Amanda Phua

The New Paper
Monday, Oct 10, 2011


.......................

The woman also said that her husband rarely helped out in the business while she dedicated herself to working on weekdays and a half day on Saturdays.

................

The company closed in August 2005, some three months after he suffered a stroke.

[/COLOR]
 

Sinkie

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
In addition to her administrative duties, she had to service about 20 fire extinguishers daily.

Walauiieee!! By comparison, Cecilia only needed to service one fire extinguisher.
 

frenchbriefs

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
i had no idea just being a woman is worth 2 million.....there is some dogs in SAF who lost 2 limb and a leg and is only worth 5k.
 

The_Hypocrite

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
I agree. The wife is not worth much at all. Abt the work she put in for the company n home etc it is her job. And men not suppose to help out etc as its the women's job. But this man damn stupid. He should just pay her like 2k per mth to cover his backside...the 2k he can get back by just getting her to do all the home shopping etc etc. Want to b cheap and stingy should also do it properly. By not paying her she can use tat against him.


i had no idea just being a woman is worth 2 million.....there is some dogs in SAF who lost 2 limb and a leg and is only worth 5k.
 

halsey02

Alfrescian (Inf)
Asset
The wife should be happy her stroke patient ah lau still wants to ups her at 54 years old.. Which man won't kick this ungrateful woman off the bed??

He had a stroke, seems that the stroke did not affect the portion of his brain, that controls his urge....his doctor in charge of his therapy, should have taken note...ha ha ha or she is so beautiful, even at this age....with a STROKE...he still want to.......!!

Give that man a "TIGER"!:biggrin:
 
Top